North East SSoM Members!!!

My car so far loves that PRO-M Meter and the #42's, I havnt really ripped on it just b/c its not tunned but it pulls harder/quicker through the RPM Range. Should run pretty mint after the chip tomorrow, cant wait to see what it actually puts down.
 
Well, back from the dyno and have some new #'s. My A/F is perfect with it a little rich at the end. Which is hurting my peak HP. Anyway, I got:
478 RWTQ
505 RWTQ

I'am pretty happy since the car runs much better than last year. My low end TQ is higher since I leaned it out from the stock tune. Next, I need to put the spout back in an mess with the timing. That should help my power down low under 3000rpms. Here a pic of the dyno sheet. It's a lay over from being untuned. figures it was in the 80's today, but my intake air temps were in the 140's.
 
Well, back from the dyno and have some new #'s. My A/F is perfect with it a little rich at the end. Which is hurting my peak HP. Anyway, I got:
478 RWTQ
505 RWTQ

I'am pretty happy since the car runs much better than last year. My low end TQ is higher since I leaned it out from the stock tune. Next, I need to put the spout back in an mess with the timing. That should help my power down low under 3000rpms. Here a pic of the dyno sheet. It's a lay over from being untuned. figures it was in the 80's today, but my intake air temps were in the 140's.

vbgarage.php
 
whitehorseupnorth said:
Well, back from the dyno and have some new #'s. My A/F is perfect with it a little rich at the end. Which is hurting my peak HP. Anyway, I got:
478 RWTQ
505 RWTQ

I'am pretty happy since the car runs much better than last year. My low end TQ is higher since I leaned it out from the stock tune. Next, I need to put the spout back in an mess with the timing. That should help my power down low under 3000rpms. Here a pic of the dyno sheet. It's a lay over from being untuned. figures it was in the 80's today, but my intake air temps were in the 140's.

vbgarage.php
Nice. really shows how far off F-1's dyno is.......you ought to go check out mikes dyno once its in to get a brand new dyno's reading.....
 
Dan_Soprano said:
Nice. really shows how far off F-1's dyno is.......you ought to go check out mikes dyno once its in to get a brand new dyno's reading.....

Yeah, i would like to. I wanto lean out the very top and put the spark back in the bottom end. See what that does. Maybe, I'll make a tune for 12-13#'s :D
 
was a good dyno day hott as hell but my car is running SOOOO much better w/ that chip in it. Even w/ as hot as it was and only cooling mods being a 180 T-stat I never hit 200* on the way home. My car is not numb down low anymore it feels like a whole new car I love it.

Dan your not kidding about F1's #'s being off. According to there #'s I put down 370 and 425.

After the dyno tune today Im at 340 RWHP and 353 RWTQ. My goal was 350 RWHP on stock heads and cam, despite the temps being in the 80's I prob would hit that on a nice cold crips morn/night. The Supercharger was making 10 LBS of boost which was nice the power pipe helps alot, Chris said he saw 12 LBS on one pull.

Over all the dyno tune was well worth it, that chip did wonders in the driveability.

attachment.php
 
Dan_Soprano said:
I'm starting to think that maybe Pete's dyno is off a bit too on the low side........I think both your guy's #'s should have been a bit higher......... You still gonna take up F1 on there offer to do another pull for free?


yeah I am we couldnt today b/c they were to busy but I'll go down sometime soon.

After Mike gets his dyno in we can compare that to pete's #'s. Id say that F1 is more off then anyone , just look at my TQ #'s there was a 72 FT LB diffrence.
 
DoubleONegative said:
Nice numbers trav!!!!

is it idleing better now????


Idle is mint now, no more surging. The Idle just stays at 600 and does not even move. I think having the PRO-M on there helps alot. Even before the tune it would idle alot better then the C&L did. I know there are alot of blown cars out there running C&L's but just like I told chris, I dont want to throw down the $$$ for a dyno tune and come away w/ it not running to my satisfaction. C&L's are hard enough as it is to tune on blown cars ( and even pete said) that the 94/95 computers are the hardest ones to tune and when you throw those 2 factors together Im about 95% sure that I would have not been happy w/ the results when I left.

On a side note.....

The first hurricane or almost hurricane is on it was to the US mainland and where is it heading............. Thats right FL :D
 
whitehorseupnorth said:
Yeah, i would like to. I wanto lean out the very top and put the spark back in the bottom end. See what that does. Maybe, I'll make a tune for 12-13#'s :D

Hey Chris, Question for ya.... I cant see you graph that well with this crappy computer but it doesnt look like you gained anything in the mid range even with leaning it out almost 2 points :shrug: whats up with that?