• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Stang's drag coefficients?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willy_sc5.0
  • Start date Start date Jul 25, 2004
W

willy_sc5.0

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
46
0
0
NY
Jul 25, 2004
#1
  • Jul 25, 2004
  • #1
Do anybody knows what's the drag coefficient for the previous and new stangs?
87-93: ?
94-04: ?
05: ?

Thanks!
 
P

PoorYuppie

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
67
0
0
Jul 27, 2004
#2
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #2
Yeah, right. No one talks about those numbers unless they have been improved and worked on specifically for braggin rights to the press...like the corvette and S7. I doubt you will find them. I doubt the older ones were even measured.
 

93 teal terror

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2001
971
62
69
Durham N.C.
Jul 27, 2004
#3
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #3
I dont remember the numbers, but I believe the 97-93 hatches were better than the newer stangs
 
W

willy_sc5.0

New Member
Jun 20, 2004
46
0
0
NY
Jul 27, 2004
#4
  • Jul 27, 2004
  • #4
It's a shame that ford is not paying any atention to this. It's cool to win 1/4 runs . .. but is kind of disappointing to see many mustangs loosing highway brawls because it's horrible aerodynamics and 5spd with the overdive 5th gear(instead of a 6spd).
 
P

PoorYuppie

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
67
0
0
Jul 28, 2004
#5
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #5
Drastic changes would have to be made to the body style to make much of a difference. You end up with jelly bean styling...aka the new GTO. The look of the new stang is what will sell it, not the efficiency. That is why the camaro isn't with us any longer and the stang is. Comaro got better mpg/hp because of the aerodynamic shape but looked like crap, so they couldn't sell as many as the v6 stangs(the real money maker for ford).
 
B

beary58

New Member
Jan 20, 2003
69
0
0
Jul 28, 2004
#6
  • Jul 28, 2004
  • #6
>>The look of the new stang is what will sell it, not the efficiency.<<

Yep, if you go back and read the comments folks liked about the 05, most of them are about the looks of the front end. That great big open mouth grill that looks as if it's trying suck all the air out of the sky. It made for terrible aerodynamics back in the 60's and it hasn't change much. But it will sell very well.

Just make sure you shut it down before 120 MPH when you are beating that vett.

2000 White Vert
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3.08 gears with a manual trans
  • limp
  • Aug 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
924
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Qtrhrse23
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
353
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
2000 GT-Front Brakes Not Releasing
  • stormsedge
  • Aug 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
164
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2026
Bronco2fan
B
C
Inline 6 wanted 200 ci
  • Capnkev
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Want to Buy
Replies
2
Views
278
Want to Buy Jul 16, 2026
Capnkev
C
S
FUEL PUMP ALWAYS ON
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
654
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 4, 2026
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?