• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Progress Thread Starting New Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter loyalblue
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 27, 2015
#21
  • May 27, 2015
  • #21
hoopty5.0 said:



Talk this guy down some. It's in your back yard.
Click to expand...

Damn...this IS in my back yard! It's got the staple DragLites on it, too! Though I'd prolly sell those as I've had them on 2 previous Mustangs...this time around I'm going with the ConvoPros, but still it's great car! Kinda exactly what I want and the little rust can easily be fixed. I'm gonna give his a call and maybe go check it out this evening. Thanks for post, I really appreciate it!
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 28, 2015
#22
  • May 28, 2015
  • #22
Well, I think I decided to go with the Scat 9000 331 rotating assembly, with the forged pistons. You guys think that'll handle ~400 rwhp? I decided to listen to you guys about putting the high dollar stuff in a stock block and the block splitting before the internals give. Looking to throw 8-10 lbs of boost on it and was wondering if the assembly will handle that? Was gonna go with what I usually go with as far as heads...pretty much the staple TrickFlow TW, but think I'm going AFR this time but I want to know if I'm good with the 175s or should I get the 185s? Either way, they'll be ported and polshed unless I can get the AFRs already worked up. One more thing, will the Anderson B-31 do the trick? I'm also wanting to rid my Pony of the "alphabet" E-cam I've always used in the past and the B-31 seems like it's what I'm looking for. I was also thinking of going with the Performer RPM II to top it all off. That's just kind of what I like with the research I've done this past week. Nothing is definite, though...I'm still in the very early stages of deciding what "goodies" to put together. Please advise.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
May 29, 2015
#23
  • May 29, 2015
  • #23
loyalblue said:
Well, I think I decided to go with the Scat 9000 331 rotating assembly, with the forged pistons. You guys think that'll handle ~400 rwhp? I decided to listen to you guys about putting the high dollar stuff in a stock block and the block splitting before the internals give. Looking to throw 8-10 lbs of boost on it and was wondering if the assembly will handle that? Was gonna go with what I usually go with as far as heads...pretty much the staple TrickFlow TW, but think I'm going AFR this time but I want to know if I'm good with the 175s or should I get the 185s? Either way, they'll be ported and polshed unless I can get the AFRs already worked up. One more thing, will the Anderson B-31 do the trick? I'm also wanting to rid my Pony of the "alphabet" E-cam I've always used in the past and the B-31 seems like it's what I'm looking for. I was also thinking of going with the Performer RPM II to top it all off. That's just kind of what I like with the research I've done this past week. Nothing is definite, though...I'm still in the very early stages of deciding what "goodies" to put together. Please advise.
Click to expand...

Unless you are going to buy a dart block, the stock bottom end (rotating assy) will handle more than the block will. I'm doing 450/489 to the rear wheels @ 9-10 psi with stock bottom end, some old edlelbrock rpm heads and an rpm II intake. If you are going to boost it, and are not shooting for over 500 rwhp, an expensive crank kit is not money well spent.
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#24
  • May 29, 2015
  • #24
Boosted92LX said:
Unless you are going to buy a dart block, the stock bottom end (rotating assy) will handle more than the block will. I'm doing 450/489 to the rear wheels @ 9-10 psi with stock bottom end, some old edlelbrock rpm heads and an rpm II intake. If you are going to boost it, and are not shooting for over 500 rwhp, an expensive crank kit is not money well spent.
Click to expand...
I thought that $850-ish for the complete Scat 331 rotating assembly was going the cheap way...I think any cheaper than that would be some stuff straight from China, I have this thing about buying USA, and from what I've read the rough forgings for the Scat stuff are from China but the final machining (which is the machining that really counts) is done right here in the States. The Scat 9000 is a really good cast crank from all I've read, dominating the Eagle stuff. I figured if I ever do go with a better block, I'll have some really good parts to transfer over. I just think $850 for a crank, forged rods/pistons, rings, bearings, etc was a hell of a good deal.
Question...What about AFR 185s? I've never run AFRs before, always have run TrickFlow, but everything I read about AFR seems to be good stuff. Since the heads come 100% intake/exhaust/combustion chamber ported, can they still be opened up to flow better?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 29, 2015
#25
  • May 29, 2015
  • #25
loyalblue said:
Well, I think I decided to go with the Scat 9000 331 rotating assembly, with the forged pistons. You guys think that'll handle ~400 rwhp? I decided to listen to you guys about putting the high dollar stuff in a stock block and the block splitting before the internals give. Looking to throw 8-10 lbs of boost on it and was wondering if the assembly will handle that? Was gonna go with what I usually go with as far as heads...pretty much the staple TrickFlow TW, but think I'm going AFR this time but I want to know if I'm good with the 175s or should I get the 185s? Either way, they'll be ported and polshed unless I can get the AFRs already worked up. One more thing, will the Anderson B-31 do the trick? I'm also wanting to rid my Pony of the "alphabet" E-cam I've always used in the past and the B-31 seems like it's what I'm looking for. I was also thinking of going with the Performer RPM II to top it all off. That's just kind of what I like with the research I've done this past week. Nothing is definite, though...I'm still in the very early stages of deciding what "goodies" to put together. Please advise.
Click to expand...
All the parts you're talking about would be a very solid combo. The Anderson cam is a solid option. I will recommend going with the trick flow 11r heads in either the 190-205cc cnc ported version. But the AFR heads are a solid option and it comes down to personal preference. Go with at least a 185cc head and with moderate boost levels(regular Vortech unit for example w/stock pulleys) you'll make 450-500 easily. Your plans are relatively save as long as you have a proper tune up. Now if you plan on adding more boost or spin over 6k rpm regularly the block will break. But otherwise should run well for a few years
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 29, 2015
#26
  • May 29, 2015
  • #26
Now what I would do is just get a dart shortblock and wait to add boost if the budget is tight. You can have an all forged rotating assembly for around 4500$ A good 363 will make 450+ rwhp without boost. Sell the machined 302 roller.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
May 29, 2015
#27
  • May 29, 2015
  • #27
loyalblue said:
I thought that $850-ish for the complete Scat 331 rotating assembly was going the cheap way...I think any cheaper than that would be some stuff straight from China, I have this thing about buying USA, and from what I've read the rough forgings for the Scat stuff are from China but the final machining (which is the machining that really counts) is done right here in the States. The Scat 9000 is a really good cast crank from all I've read, dominating the Eagle stuff. I figured if I ever do go with a better block, I'll have some really good parts to transfer over. I just think $850 for a crank, forged rods/pistons, rings, bearings, etc was a hell of a good deal.
Question...What about AFR 185s? I've never run AFRs before, always have run TrickFlow, but everything I read about AFR seems to be good stuff. Since the heads come 100% intake/exhaust/combustion chamber ported, can they still be opened up to flow better?
Click to expand...


Well, yeah that is cheap for a stroker, but my point was you can make all the power the stock block can handle on the factory crank rods and pistons, IF you are going with a supercharger or turbo. Like I said, if you are boosting it, you can buy bearings and rings if the bores aren't wasted and put the leftover 5 or 600 bucks you saved not buying the stroker kit for a good tune.

If you plan on buying the stroker kit and a power adder for boost, the engine will never see it's potential on the stock block, so why not make 450 to 500 hp and save money?
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
May 29, 2015
#28
  • May 29, 2015
  • #28
Or, do like @A5literMan says, and build a dart stroker and run it n/a untill you can save up money for a blower and really lay it down..

I'm going dart 363 later on and turning my boost up to about 20 psi.
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91 and A5literMan

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#29
  • May 29, 2015
  • #29
Ok...let's just forget everything I've said up to this point. I think I'm gonna just go with a 351 roller since I'm starting from scratch. It will also be cool to put the 5.8 badge behind the fender. I think as far as heads go, I'll go with the AFR 195s, same cam, 351 LIM (will the Performer RPM II have any issues bolting up to that?). I'm not really worried about hood clearance as it will have a raised cowl. Will that stock block take some abuse if it's tuned correctly? I will probably be changing my mind an awful lot during this build as new information arises, and preferences change. Meanwhile, I'll be picking up a fresh 302 block from my machinist next week...it'll be for sale
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
May 29, 2015
#30
  • May 29, 2015
  • #30
loyalblue said:
Ok...let's just forget everything I've said up to this point. I think I'm gonna just go with a 351 roller since I'm starting from scratch. It will also be cool to put the 5.8 badge behind the fender. I think as far as heads go, I'll go with the AFR 195s, same cam, 351 LIM (will the Performer RPM II have any issues bolting up to that?). I'm not really worried about hood clearance as it will have a raised cowl. Will that stock block take some abuse if it's tuned correctly? I will probably be changing my mind an awful lot during this build as new information arises, and preferences change. Meanwhile, I'll be picking up a fresh 302 block from my machinist next week...it'll be for sale
Click to expand...



A 351w block is good for 700+hp. A 302 intake will not fit it nor will the oil pan. There are pros and cons to a 351w, it can be stroked to 7 liters, very strong, but add unwanted weight to an already nose heavy car. If you are only driving straight line they are great. If you like to corner, stick with a 302 based motor.
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#31
  • May 29, 2015
  • #31
Yeah, I'm not much of a corner'r, to be honest, I don't really speed, I just like to know I have it. Stop light to stop light would mainly be my concern if I do decide to lay into it. With it being (more) nose heavy with the 351, I was thinking aftermarket k-member and manual rack to offset that weight gain, I'll also be running aluminum heads so I think it'll corner fine, if not better than a 302. Yes/no?
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
May 29, 2015
#32
  • May 29, 2015
  • #32
I have a 331ci motor with scat rotating assembly, h beam rods, ported twisted wedge heads, holley systemax intake, 75mm throttle body, 30lb injectors, comp cam xe282 cam, mexico block, and main girdle....wish I would've bought a 351 and stroked to a 393...way cheaper....still no replacement for displacement.
 
Reactions: Cmoses

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
May 29, 2015
#33
  • May 29, 2015
  • #33
To answer your question...a friend of mine has a 351 stroked to a 427 in his fox.... Upgraded brakes and suspension... The extra weight isn't that much. Coil overs, k-member, fiberglass hood, and air pump ditching more than make up for the poundage.
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#34
  • May 29, 2015
  • #34
The golden rule...regarding cubic inches
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#35
  • May 29, 2015
  • #35
I was thinking the same thing...with the aluminum heads alone you make up that weight
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 29, 2015
#36
  • May 29, 2015
  • #36
You won't make up the weight with just alum heads but it really isn't a big deal. You won't notice the difference in weight 351 vs 302. If going 351w based I highly recommend a stroker kit. There are a ton of 408's making 550 fwhp with a ton of torque. And like posted above they can take 750-800. Go with a single plane intake like the super Vic EFI intake or Tfs r box intake. The b31 cam is to small go with a custom roller(I got mine for 403$)
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#37
  • May 29, 2015
  • #37
Thanks ASliterMan...I think my first Mustang ('90 LX) had a box intake. It was a Hartman intake...I think they called a "breadbox" intake. I was also going to install the lowering motor mounts to get the center of gravity a little lower. You're right about stroking it...I was thinking 39, later stroking to a 408/427 on the next build. When you say the cam is too small, are you suggesting something with more lift? How do I go about getting a custom grind? I'm not really educated on the geometry and flow specs of cams and what would be good for me, so on and so forth...will the grinder and me communicate on what I'm looking for? Just never done that process before. Should I go forged crank on this or will a good cast be sufficient enough? H-beam or I-beam rods?
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 29, 2015
#38
  • May 29, 2015
  • #38
...maybe the Trick Flow Stage 2 cam for the 351 with 1.7 roller rockers to squeeze a little more lift out of it
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
May 30, 2015
#39
  • May 30, 2015
  • #39
I can send you Freezy's phone number(he's the one that Spec'd my cam). But yes you just need to know what you want to do with the i.e what heads,intake,trans,rear gear ratio,compression ratio,exhaust size,planned useage(drag strip,street,street/strip,etc). But for a healthy 408 I would be expecting duration figures around at least 230's to 240's with lift numbers in the high .500's to low .600's. DONT run 302 parts on a 393-427 build!! It will under perform(still make power but you could be loosing 100hp over its potential). Also the 195 head will be only adequate for this build. If you're going to the expense of buying a stroker kit buy the 4" stroke crank. You will make a lot more torque and with the right topend components still turn some rpm's. If you're just going to be n/a a cast crank and I beam rods will be adequate. If you're going to add a power adder then I'd go forged assembly with h beams. To give you an example I have a customer at work who is a bracket racer(actually won nationals before). He's running a 408 with AFR 205's(the older AFR heads before they redesigned to the renegades). He has a solid roller cam( over 250 duration @.050 w/ .621 lift)carb/single plane intake and some custom 1 7/8"-3 1/2" collector headers. He had the motor dyno'd(engine dyno not a chassis dyno). It made just over 600 hp and he runs consistent 9.80's. Now this obviously is a drag car. I just wanted to give an example of what the potential is. A milder build would still make a great street/strip monster.
 

loyalblue

Member
Jun 8, 2013
42
12
18
Katy, TX
May 30, 2015
#40
  • May 30, 2015
  • #40
That is some good info, I appreciate your time...I'm definitely getting an education through all this. Once I get closer to getting a cam I'll get that number from you. I'm gonna do a little research on parts, get the block, have it spec'd and cleaned and then I'll start putting the pieces of the rotating assembly together. You've given me a good place to start...thanks again.
 
Reactions: A5literMan
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
689
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
802
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
611
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
696
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?