• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Steeda vs. Eibach lowering springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLADDER92FOX
  • Start date Start date Feb 15, 2006

BLADDER92FOX

Member
Apr 4, 2005
153
0
17
Miami
Feb 15, 2006
#1
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #1
I'm buying some lowering springs in about 2 week for my car,but im not sure of which to go with. I hear things about both of these springs.I heard the ride is great with steeda's,but i asked my mech about getting a stiffer ride and he said if i want a stiffer ride to go with eibach's. Also which one lowers the car more,i also want the car to be lowered between 1.5 inches to like 1 and a quarter. I just want to tires to just barely be tucked in the wheel wells,and i want an even stance to my ride too.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Feb 15, 2006
#2
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #2
I have the steeda springs and i love them. When i put them in i also put kyb struts + shocks in at the same time and honestly the ride was better than stock after the swap. They are stiff, but i think in conjuction with the struts, it takes bumps more solidly and assuringly. The car dropped about 2 inches in the front and maybe 1.5 in the back. My car really had the jacked up leaned back look b4 the swap so i was very pleased with how much it dropped. good luck man
 

BLADDER92FOX

Member
Apr 4, 2005
153
0
17
Miami
Feb 15, 2006
#3
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #3
I have tokico shocks on the back and i'm about to install the struts when i get them this week from someone i know.Is your car stance even?is is there more gap at the rear since you said it dropped the car 2 inches in front ans 1.5 in the back.From what i see on foxes is that the rear has more of a gap of space than the front. At least with my car that is.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 15, 2006
#4
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #4
I have Eibach sportlines, they are a little stiff, but I like them. they helped even out the backwards rake it had, but it still has it a touch
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Feb 15, 2006
#5
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #5
I love my steedas, even though I just went with coil-overs in the back a few day ago. My front sits just perfect, about a 2" drop. The back at first was about an 1", but after settling it was about 1 1/2". Car sat real even. I highly recommend them. I also had KYB shocks and struts.
 

BLADDER92FOX

Member
Apr 4, 2005
153
0
17
Miami
Feb 15, 2006
#6
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #6
Anyone had rode in a car with both springs?Any input?
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Feb 15, 2006
#7
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #7
I rode on Eibachs before, a little stiffer and a little lower, about 2" all around. Still had that back raked look. I believe they were sportlines.
 

TrunkFunk

Banned
Dec 28, 2005
83
0
0
A1A - Beach Front Avenue ...
Feb 16, 2006
#8
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #8
The rear raked look can easily be solved by a pair of weight jacker lower control arms. Plus if you have drag slicks for the rear you can also raise the back for clearance if you ever go to the track.

I had a slight rake on mine.
I bought the Steeda aluminum jackers and they are stout enough for a street car and ride quality is unchanged from a stock lca.
I can also tell the axle has become one with the chassis now ... it doesn't slop around.

If the Steeda weight jackers are too spendy for you, then you should buy the StangNet (Pro3i) units from the parts section ... I heard they work really well also.

As for springs you could go with either, since you only want a 1.25-1.50" drop. The Eibach Pro-Kit is a softer spring than the Steeda.

Here's a link to spring rates ... remember too stiff of a spring puts more stress on the dampeners (shocks/struts) and wears them quicker. You definitely want to match your dampeners to your springs for best ride quality.

Ps - Factory springs are a progressive 425-530 up front.

http://www.miracerros.com/mustang/springs_calcs.htm

I also suggest you read the whole website ... if you haven't already.
Personally I think the Progress Tech springs are the best compromise.

http://www.miracerros.com/mustang/t_suspension.htm
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Feb 16, 2006
#9
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #9
Yea my car sits fairly level at this point it, the gap on the front wheel is about 1 figer and its about 1.5 or 2 fingers in the back. So i guess it has a slight forward rake...but thats way better than the reverse rake. My buddy had an sn95 with the eibach sportlines and his didnt drop as far as the steeda's did, and i think his ride was actually a little softer. That might be due to the better lower a arm geometry of the sn's but he was running identical struts that i was (kyb). His car sat a little more level however, no real rake at all. i love the way the front of my car looks right now....i wish that the rear was about .5 inches lower. Im going to throw in some upper and lower control arms this spring and we'll see what happens. good luck man
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
279
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
618
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
394
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Suspension A not-so-low lowering spring
  • Justin87
  • Mar 7, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 12, 2024
Justin87
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
270
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?