• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Stock K Member Capabilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter patboy
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2012

patboy

Member
Oct 22, 2006
38
0
7
Dallas TX
Jul 30, 2012
#1
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #1
In the end, I hope to be putting around 650 ponies to the back wheels of the ol' stang. My question is how much abuse will the stock k - member take before something goes wrong up there? it's a 93 coupe, the chassis pretty stiff; 8 point roll bar and sub frame connectors. I realized it would probably be to my advantage just to switch it out (to a tubular k-member), but I really don't want to shell out the benjamins for it. Thinking I could stiffin the stock unit by welding some thick metal along most of it for support if i needed to. But im really wondering how much it will handle "as is" from the factory? I'm just going to be running 17" low profile tires on it, not drag slicks or anything. I'm not going to beaing taking to drag it probaby at all, but may get into some road course type racing some day. I will probably just end up getting the tubular k member in the end. If anyone has some testimonies about what a dramatic improvment it has made I would like to hear. I appreciate any input you have on the subject
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jul 30, 2012
#2
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #2
Your k memberr isnt whats at risk. Unless you have to radically change your s suspension geometry your stock k member will last the life of the car.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 30, 2012
#3
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #3
Man i have never heard of anyone literally breaking the stock K member. Not even bending or tweaking.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jul 30, 2012
#4
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #4
The better question would be to ask how many people broke their tubular k member.
 
Reactions: patboy

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jul 30, 2012
#5
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #5
stykthyn said:
The better question would be to ask how many people broke their tubular k member.
Click to expand...

Winner winner chicken dinner.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jul 30, 2012
#6
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #6
Fried chikin? I like sweet and sour chikin too.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jul 30, 2012
#7
  • Jul 30, 2012
  • #7
The ONLY reasons I have ever heard of anyone getting a tubular k-member is to a) save weight and/or b) for better looks. The stock k-member is one beefy mofo. You'll tear apart motor mounts before anything happens to that k-member.

Some aftermarket k-member designs scare me because of how little material they are made of. I'll bet that 75% of aftermarket k-members are weaker than the stock one.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

patboy

Member
Oct 22, 2006
38
0
7
Dallas TX
Jul 31, 2012
#8
  • Jul 31, 2012
  • #8
i like the input boys. that sounds like good news
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Aug 1, 2012
#9
  • Aug 1, 2012
  • #9
Indeed. Durability is not an issue with the stock k-member. People usually swap to aftermarket k-members for weight reduction and increased clearance. Some k-members also relocate suspension points to change the handling.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Aug 1, 2012
#10
  • Aug 1, 2012
  • #10
Yeah, stock is gonna be stronger than any tubular K-frame. I would just add more power and worry less about weight. Keep the strength!!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 1, 2012
#11
  • Aug 1, 2012
  • #11
Personally i would avoid any K member advertised to "save weight". That may be a byproduct of the swap, but the main goals are better front end geometry, engine set back and lower height, and more room to work with headers and oil pans. If none of those are things that you really need to deal with, then there's really no reason to swap out the stock K.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
117
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
J
K member question
  • junkyardwarrior
  • Feb 22, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 24, 2022
91TwighlightGT
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?