• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Stroke It or Bore It??????

  • Thread starter Thread starter SFStangGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 4, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
Sep 4, 2004
#21
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #21
Stroking a 4.6 is a waste of money. Most of the guys that have done it wish they didn't.

Besides you can make awesome power without it. Concentrate on the heads and the cams.
 

UVBNHAD

New Member
Aug 18, 2004
144
0
0
McCalla, AL
Sep 4, 2004
#22
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #22
I'm wondering what those main parts are myself? Would it be crank, rods, pistons, bearings because those are all replaced when you put in a stroke kit. What other main parts are there?

I kinda agree with the above post though. Stroking/boring a 4.6 is almost pointless because of the power you can produce with a blower or other modifications.
 
M

MineralGray02

New Member
Aug 24, 2004
11
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#23
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #23
wuts best for a twin turbo set up? cause thats in the works right now and i need some help determining how to run over 10 psi without frying my engine
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Sep 4, 2004
#24
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #24
well i guess following that mechanics theory, you shouldnt put in forged internals because that would be changing the main engine parts. the mechanic my family went to has been turning wrenches for 30+ years, he retired, but he still works on our cars at his house. he is old school, but he still keeps up with all the current trends for working on cars. the mechanic that told you that shouldnt be allowed to touch anything newer than 1980. im sure he also recommends arco graphite oil, putting in STP at every oil change, and still says that we should be running carbs and leaded gas.

for the twin turbo setup, i would suggest running a 03/o4 cobra crank, some manley rods and CP pistons. if you want you can go with a big bore setup, as that will allow the air inlet charge to go in easier because of the unshrouded valves. however the big bore makes the cylinder walls thinner and theoretically could make them weaker. so just use a stock bore and stroke, maybe a .020 or .030 overbore if there is a ring ridge.
 
M

MineralGray02

New Member
Aug 24, 2004
11
0
0
Sep 4, 2004
#25
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #25
good info, thx, is there anything else anyone reccomends?
 

Defleshed

Satanic Mechanic
Nov 30, 2003
10,569
1
0
In Torment, In Hell
Sep 5, 2004
#26
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #26
4.6's need more bore. they have plenty of stroke already.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Sep 5, 2004
#27
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #27
as a first year auto technician student, im no expert.......however, you must break it down to the basics i.e. what gives you more power? power comes from the air and fuel into your engine. the more air and fuel you can cram into the combustion chamber, the easier you can make power. thats why turbos and blowers are so popular: they compress more air into the chamber. IMHO, i would bore over stroke any day. if you only stroked the car with no other modification to the engine, you would just get a higher compression ratio (which isnt necessarily bad) and longer moving parts, which are not ideal for higher reving engines, although there are exceptions as we see from michael kidd's beast. whereas when you bore an engine, you allow more air and fuel into the chamber for a bigger "explosion". ideal, you would want to bore and stroke at the same time, but if i had to pick, i would say bore. but not too much b/c, as mentioned earlier, the more metal you take away from the block, the weaker it becomes. not good for a high horsepower car. there are always sacrifices tho.
 

kah9911

New Member
May 20, 2004
102
0
0
Downingtown, PA
Sep 5, 2004
#28
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #28
Well the big bore has proven to be a bit more powerfull everything being equal. It unshrouds the vaulves like some stated above. But the down side is it can only be done on a aluminum block. The stroker can be done on your iron block. If you do either put forged internals in because you have it torn apart anyway.

Here is some "light" reading for you. There was a good discution on MD a while back about this so hope you have plenty of time.
 
S

SFStangGT

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
53
0
0
South Florida
Sep 5, 2004
#29
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #29
Sounds to me like boring or stroking is a waste of time on our 4.6's. Better off just saving the money and put it into better pistons, crank, rods, heads and block. As with Micheal's car, he had a completely built engine (internals, heads, custom cams, etc..) and a great tuner. Was it really the stroker kit that made his beast??? That is why I started this thread, I was wanting to know which is better and if either was even worth it.
 
S

super street

New Member
Jan 15, 2004
38
0
0
houston
Sep 5, 2004
#30
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #30
big bore is ok on n/a cars, but horrible on the forced induction side. i wouldn't reccomend doing it because too thin of walls causes block failure.

stroker is a toss up, you get more low end torque but if you're going forced induction you need a bigger blower to compensate for the extra inches. i've never heard or seen anyone using a modular n/a stroker.

as for the stroker having a slow rev, i haven't noticed anything going slow on mine.
 
S

super street

New Member
Jan 15, 2004
38
0
0
houston
Sep 5, 2004
#31
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #31
white99gt said:
Really and where have you seen block failure on a big bore with boost?

I personally say a stroker of big bore is not worth the extra money..Use it to add other parts to the car..
Click to expand...
there's a guy down here that had the big bore w/a kenne bell pushing 15# and cracked the block.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Sep 5, 2004
#32
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #32
super street said:
big bore is ok on n/a cars, but horrible on the forced induction side. i wouldn't reccomend doing it because too thin of walls causes block failure.

stroker is a toss up, you get more low end torque but if you're going forced induction you need a bigger blower to compensate for the extra inches. i've never heard or seen anyone using a modular n/a stroker.

as for the stroker having a slow rev, i haven't noticed anything going slow on mine.
Click to expand...


Really and where have you seen block failure on a big bore with boost?

I personally say a stroker of big bore is not worth the extra money..Use it to add other parts to the car..
 
S

SFStangGT

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
53
0
0
South Florida
Sep 5, 2004
#33
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #33
white99gt said:
Really and where have you seen block failure on a big bore with boost?

I personally say a stroker of big bore is not worth the extra money..Use it to add other parts to the car..
Click to expand...

I think I will have to agree with a person who is putting down over 600rwhp on pump gas. You might actually know a thing or two.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Sep 5, 2004
#34
  • Sep 5, 2004
  • #34
SFStangGT said:
I think I will have to agree with a person who is putting down over 600rwhp on pump gas. You might actually know a thing or two.
Click to expand...

I know a few things..Ive turned every wrenchon my own car besides the building of the motor itself..But everything else was done by me..

Nothing against any of the other high hp cars with bigbore /stroker motors..I just think a stroker/big bore is not needed..If you have the extra cash fine..But a few thousand dollars goes a long way into a new tranny or rear setup to hold the power..Plus how much power do you really need in a street car ..
 
S

super street

New Member
Jan 15, 2004
38
0
0
houston
Sep 11, 2004
#35
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #35
SFStangGT said:
I think I will have to agree with a person who is putting down over 600rwhp on pump gas. You might actually know a thing or two.
Click to expand...
yeah a 600+ hp car that runs 11.60s.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Sep 11, 2004
#36
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #36
super street said:
yeah a 600+ hp car that runs 11.60s.
Click to expand...

Guess you were not bright enough to look on my mods page and see i ran 11.60 with 481rwhp and a race wieght of 3610 on dot drag radials..
 

stallion98gt

New Member
May 12, 2003
1,802
0
0
Los Angeles, CA
Sep 11, 2004
#37
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #37
white99gt said:
Guess you were not bright enough to look on my mods page and see i ran 11.60 with 481rwhp and a race wieght of 3610 on dot drag radials..
Click to expand...
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Sep 11, 2004
#38
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #38
HpMan said:
I hear stroking the engine is bad for your car cause youre not upgrading other main parts. My mechanic told me its detrimintal (sp) for the engien! MY mechanics been workin on fords for 20 years! I think he knows more than you people!
Click to expand...

Yeah, he sounds like a real pillar of automotive knowledge.

white99gt said:
Guess you were not bright enough to look on my mods page and see i ran 11.60 with 481rwhp and a race wieght of 3610 on dot drag radials..
Click to expand...

See what happens when you don't know what you're talking about?
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Sep 12, 2004
#39
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #39
Ask Michael Kidd (screwed2v I think) if a stroker is a good idea on a 4.6 2v.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Sep 12, 2004
#40
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #40
Mossberg said:
Ask Michael Kidd (screwed2v I think) if a stroker is a good idea on a 4.6 2v.
Click to expand...

It is if it's going on a turbo/supercharger setup. N/A you're shooting yourself in the foot.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
65
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
192
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
679
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?