• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Subframe connectors question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Oct 7, 2006

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 7, 2006
#1
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #1
I posted this question in another thread but I don't want to hijack so I'll start this one.

Are there any drawbacks to heating up the subs to mold them with the contour of the under body? I mean, cause I have clearance issues and I can't give up any room down there. Check out this pic from BensCobra:
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 7, 2006
#2
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #2
Maybe it's just the angle, but it looks like the exhaust is lower than the subframe connectors.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Oct 7, 2006
#3
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #3
Heating up the metal will spread out the molecules in the connectors and make the metal more flexible IMO. I would not do it.
Scott
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Oct 7, 2006
#4
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #4
mo_dingo said:
Heating up the metal will spread out the molecules in the connectors and make the metal more flexible IMO. I would not do it.
Scott
Click to expand...

:Word:

if you are worried about ground clearance, open up your wallet and find someone to do through-the-floor connectors.
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Oct 7, 2006
#5
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #5
thats why I dont have subframes. That plus im getting side exhaust.


My car already scrapes everywhere. I wouldnt doubt if they would get torn off.
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Oct 8, 2006
#6
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #6
I think some minor modification to SF connectors is normal to make em fit right.
 
B

BadAndy

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
766
0
0
Ohio
Oct 9, 2006
#7
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #7
this is why i still have stock springs
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 9, 2006
#8
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #8
The molecules would spread out more, but it's still going to be pretty sturdy. I mean, it pretty thick squared tubing.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Oct 10, 2006
#9
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #9
i can't imagine it would do that much. they are welded in right?

i mean the SFC are what at most an inch thick. your rocker panels are deeper than that.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Oct 10, 2006
#10
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #10
BadAndy said:
this is why i still have stock springs
Click to expand...

I did too. Roads here suck. I finally got tired of EVERYONE telling me to lower the car. Put uncut drag launch springs on the car. Now when a punk makes a comment about lowering the car. I reply "it has drag springs on it."

They usually reply.... oh, then that's okay.
 

True 5.0

Member
Sep 22, 2006
237
0
17
Southeastern Wisconsin
Oct 15, 2006
#11
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #11
ProKiller said:
i can't imagine it would do that much. they are welded in right?

i mean the SFC are what at most an inch thick. your rocker panels are deeper than that.
Click to expand...

I totally agree. I have a set of Super Subs and they are no where near the bottom line of the car.
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Oct 15, 2006
#12
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #12
My Steeda subframes definately seem like they fit tighter to the body than that...
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#13
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #13
how much were they, flyby?
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Oct 16, 2006
#14
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #14
150 for the ones that will rust
175 for the ones that wont

www.steeda.com
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Oct 16, 2006
#15
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #15
no rust +$25 = worth it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
803
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
850
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Electrical Ron Francis Headlight / Alternator Harness
  • dan50
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
179
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
dan50
W
Electrical 91 GT Alternator Replacement Question
  • willrh111
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
299
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
nickyb
Radio, Speaker Upgrades
  • TripleYellow
  • Apr 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
101
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
TripleYellow
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?