• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Suspension Overhaul

  • Thread starter Thread starter 64Rudster
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Sep 2, 2017
#21
  • Sep 2, 2017
  • #21
Lowering it will make it harsher. One of the hazards of the nicer look. The new springs won't travel nearly as much. Heck, if you got a set of new oem springs, they would seem harsher as well just because they have had decades of bouncing on them.

Did you get lower profile tires?

How about the rear control arms? Did you get new bushings there? The urethane ones will transmit more road harshness as well.
 

92Apocalypso

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
217
62
58
Sep 2, 2017
#22
  • Sep 2, 2017
  • #22
Davedacarpainter said:
Lowering it will make it harsher. One of the hazards of the nicer look. The new springs won't travel nearly as much. Heck, if you got a set of new oem springs, they would seem harsher as well just because they have had decades of bouncing on them.

Did you get lower profile tires?

How about the rear control arms? Did you get new bushings there? The urethane ones will transmit more road harshness as well.
Click to expand...

rear control arms are the only thing I haven't done yet. do you have any suggestions? wheels are 17" fr500s, and actually havw a little more meat up front than the usual people run, but I can't think of size offhand. I'll live with it all, but it just rides rougher than anything I've ever had before, not even close.
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Sep 2, 2017
#23
  • Sep 2, 2017
  • #23
Do Maximum Motorsports if you can. They recommend a stock replacement for the uppers. There lower control arms are just beautiful. They have several different levels, mainly the bushings are different.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,960
10,602
203
polk county florida
Sep 2, 2017
#24
  • Sep 2, 2017
  • #24
Make sure they are greaseable, mine don't have the fittings, although 40k+ no squeeks.
Yet
Maybe
Stereo too loud
 
Reactions: 92Apocalypso

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Sep 3, 2017
#25
  • Sep 3, 2017
  • #25
For the rear control arms do MM like others suggested. I had their sport arms and recently upgraded them to the adjustable version so I could tweak the rear ride height.

I have the same setup as you have with the Koni Orange, Steeda springs, and 17" wheels and while my car is stiff it doesn't beat you up like yours is.

What kind of chassis bracing are you running? That can make all the difference in the world in your car feeling like it's going to fall apart when you hit a bump or nice and solid. I have subframe connectors, K member brace, strut tower brace, and the Stifflers trans crossmember and my car feels very solid.
 
Reactions: BobbyT

92Apocalypso

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
217
62
58
Sep 3, 2017
#26
  • Sep 3, 2017
  • #26
Dan02gt said:
For the rear control arms do MM like others suggested. I had their sport arms and recently upgraded them to the adjustable version so I could tweak the rear ride height.

I have the same setup as you have with the Koni Orange, Steeda springs, and 17" wheels and while my car is stiff it doesn't beat you up like yours is.

What kind of chassis bracing are you running? That can make all the difference in the world in your car feeling like it's going to fall apart when you hit a bump or nice and solid. I have subframe connectors, K member brace, strut tower brace, and the Stifflers trans crossmember and my car feels very solid.
Click to expand...

I haven't added anything yet, it's all factory. what's best bang for buck you recommend?

also sorry for hijacking the original posters thread haha
 

Dan02gt

mazing how much gas smell came from that tiny hole
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 2, 2003
909
415
113
Greenville, NC
Sep 3, 2017
#27
  • Sep 3, 2017
  • #27
I would do the subframe connectors first as they make the biggest difference, but if budget allows it this kit is pretty nice:

http://www.maximummotorsports.com/Chassis-Brace-Package-1986-93-Mustang-HT-EFI-P251.aspx
 
Reactions: 92Apocalypso
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
331
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
335
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
632
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
306
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
915
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?