SVO or 5.0?

foxbodymike87 · Jul 13, 2011

hey guys..i just trying to decide wether to get an svo or another 5.0..

i think a built 2.3 turbo would be sweet but on the other hand its a 5.0 lol no need to say more.

just want some input on what would be best to have fun with.

ill advised · Jul 13, 2011

Do you already have a line on an SVO? They're pretty hard to find and I'm scared to imagine what it'll cost. I've always thought they were cool but I prefer the good ole 5.0

foxbodymike87 · Jul 13, 2011

i live in mass and there everwhere i can find one in decent shape for around 3-4k

ill advised · Jul 13, 2011

foxbodymike87 said:
i live in mass and there everwhere i can find one in decent shape for around 3-4k

Really? I wouldn't have expected that. Cool.

smokin joe · Jul 13, 2011

Both, I have always liked SVO's but I like my 5.0 too.

Mustang5L5 · Jul 13, 2011

foxbodymike87 said:
i live in mass and there everwhere i can find one in decent shape for around 3-4k

Where? I rarely see one here for sale that isn't a rust box.

aar0s · Jul 13, 2011

Ive always liked the SVO's. if youve got a line on one and its in good shape id jump on it.

98gtvert · Jul 13, 2011

there are a million 5.0's running around. I havent seen a nice svo in forever!

foxbodymike87 · Jul 13, 2011

im in southcoast and i look in boston rhode island and worcester and i found pretty decent one for 4k

MUSTANG SVO 1986 TURBO

mustanglx91 · Jul 13, 2011

I like the SVO's cause you just dont see that many of them. About 2 yrs years ago my neighbor was selling one with 40,000 miles and in really nice shape for 5,000 and couldn't find any takers.

jgarrard · Jul 14, 2011

Go with the 5.0 and dont look back. I was never a fan of the SVOs looks and the power of the turbo 2.3 was never exactly mind boggling for a person who loved V8s. But thats just what I think and thats just me.

CarMichael Angelo · Jul 14, 2011

For the most part I like the SVO as an alternative to the norm.
There are a few "wonky" details that I don't like, like the square single headlights and the double "merkur style" rear wing and spoiler.

If you've never had the turbo 4, you need to know that it will not perform like the V8 will however.

Power is peaky and occurs in a very narrow band. The thing will start to make (good) power at around 3500 RPM and have to be shifted @ 6k.

The 4 cyl turbo block can handle all kinds of boost, and there are several 300-500 whp examples (or more) of the things posted on you tube, and everywhere else.

If you want that kind of HP level, that power is in an even narrower band something like 4k-6k, so just as soon as it starts to really start honkin,' you have to shift. Then wait for the motor to get back into that band in the next gear.

And torque??? The thing that the 5.0 has even at idle??? The "side effect" of having 8 cylinders where you barely have to rev the motor before releasing the clutch, and makes the car driveable on a daily basis???

Well lets just say that turbo 4's didn't come with that as a factory installed option.

I was gonna go that route.

I have an entire SVO 4 cyl turbo combination on the floor in my garage...............sitting on the floor............just sitting.... not in my car.

NIKwoaC · Jul 14, 2011

If you're in the position to get a SVO in GOOD shape at a reasonable price, I say go for it. It's super unique, has better brakes and suspension than a 5.0, and is really just a few PSI away from being a badass car. Like Mad Mike said, a turbo 4 is never going to have the off-idle torque that a V8 has, but with some upgrades to the engine and turbo system, those turbo 4s can be stupid fast. Look up John Huber's car. That thing is RETARDED fast, and it pulls something like 25 mpg. Of course, it's an extreme example, but it gives you an idea.

foxbodymike87 · Jul 14, 2011

yeah ive seen it..that thing huals..like i said if i was to go SVO i was build it up with head cam and big turbo..i like to go fast!

and my current 5.0 isnt doin it for me..it goes hard 1-and half way through 3rd..then just lugs 4th and 5th

85_SS_302_Coupe · Jul 14, 2011

While i will always be a diehard 5.0 guy, if i'm at a car show and i see two identical cars and one has a nasty built 5.0 and the other is a nasty built 2.3, i'll likely spend more time looking at the 2.3 because they're so much less common. If i'm at the drag strip and two cars run identical times and one has a 5.0 and the other has a 2.3, i'll be more impressed with the 2.3 for doing it with half the engine. I had my go at 2.3 fun with my Merkur, and if i could have afforded two toys i would've gone all out with that thing. You can make some crazy power with one for the price of an H/C/I for a 302.

foxbodymike87 · Jul 14, 2011

thanks man..you make pretty good points..i think im gunna go the SVO route and see what happens.

Gearbanger 101 · Jul 14, 2011

SVO's are overrated. Sure they handle not badly, but they're a letdown everyplace else. Even the brakes that everyone raves about aren't all that impressive.

My buddy owned a pristine example of an '86 SVO for a while. Nice car...and the turbo gimmick was cool on paper, but it was a real turd on the street. Had a nice little rush when it started to come on, but it would have easily been walked by my mother’s minivan at the time before that. In any case, they’re nothing any bolt on 5.0L couldn't annihilate with ease.

Oh...and you'd better have feet smaller than Barbie herself if you plan on driving it on a daily basis. Those friggin pedals are so close together, your feet are always getting tripped up in them.

If you want to buy it as a collector and leave it stock and run it back and forth to car shows as a conversation piece, by all means grab it up. If you want an actual driver, stick with the 5.0L. Waaaaaay more bang for the buck and you won't be chopping up a collectable car should you decide to "tinker" with it.

foxbodymike87 · Jul 14, 2011

yes..but everyone has a bolt on 5.0..i want to be as different as possible and stand out from everybody else.

85_SS_302_Coupe · Jul 14, 2011

I also wouldn't worry too much about how they run in stock trim unless you plan on leaving it stock. The reality is that a 3 inch down pipe and exhaust, a decent front mount innercooler and a manual boost controller will allow you to run 20psi and it will be a different car.

NIKwoaC · Jul 14, 2011

Gearbanger 101 said:
Oh...and you'd better have feet smaller than Barbie herself if you plan on driving it on a daily basis. Those friggin pedals are so close together, your feet are always getting tripped up in them.

Is that not just Foxes in general? I've been driving mine for almost 10 years now, and I still fumble my feet on the pedals from time to time.

SVO or 5.0?

foxbodymike87

Active Member

ill advised

Member

foxbodymike87

Active Member

ill advised

Member

smokin joe

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell

aar0s

98gtvert

foxbodymike87

Active Member

mustanglx91

Member

jgarrard

Member

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,

NIKwoaC

中國製造

foxbodymike87

Active Member

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end

foxbodymike87

Active Member

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash

foxbodymike87

Active Member

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end

NIKwoaC

中國製造

Similar threads

SVO or 5.0?

Active Member

Member

Active Member

Member

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell

Active Member

Member

Member

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,

中國製造

Active Member

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end

Active Member

Straight Outta Locash

Active Member

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end

中國製造

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency