• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

synthetic vs. mineral oil

  • Thread starter Thread starter 40th GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 23, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

40th GT

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
916
0
0
Lawrenceville, GA
Nov 26, 2004
#41
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #41
Joes95GT said:
Additionally, I hear/read people make comments about synthetics contributing to the longevity of motors. Remember the following: 1) No two motors are the same. 2) You will probably trade your car in before it's got any significant amount of miles on it 150k+. 3) You will more than likely blow-up/hurt your motor from something you did mechanically (especially high performance work) before it would fail because the oil broke down/failed/got too hot/properties/etc.

Joe
Click to expand...

2) I actaully DO intend to keep the car for more than 150k miles, because it's my first car/Mustang. I'm going to give it proper maintenance, and drive it until...god knows when. But it's definitely not going to get traded in. Because by then it won't be worth much more than $2-3k and it just won't be worth selling. If I get tired of my Mustang, I'll just buy another one and keep my first car.
3) I'm not going to do any hardcore engine mods (forced induction, cylinder heads/cams). Only thing I've done to the engine is a K&N. (if that counts)

With that said, I've decided to stick with Mobil 1 for every single oil change from now on. (I have 3k on the clock) But I do appreciate your responses, keep them coming.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Nov 26, 2004
#42
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #42
Gearbanger 101 said:
LOL....do you think that that "thin" barrier of so called protection that Amsoil provides does all that much to protect an engine from initial start up? Metal on metal is stil metal on metal.
Click to expand...
OK, you're right - it's all a scam.
 

Big Steve

Founding Member
Jun 1, 2001
195
0
16
Lower Hudson Valley NY
Nov 26, 2004
#43
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #43
Good, bad, or indifferent--I think it comes down to personal preference. People who don't believe in synthetics will argue with people who do till they are blue in the face. Do most people need synthetics? Nope. If they did, then synthetic would outsell dino. My question is : Why do you think that some manufacturers of very hi performance engines insist on synthetic oil? Answer: Because it protects better than conventional oils do in hi temp, hi stress situations.
What really sold me on synthetic was the difference on cold (below 20degrees) startups. My old 5.0's would crank real slow and the engine would labor upon startup. Not so with synthetic. They would start as if if were 60 out. I also noticed decreased oil useage at high RPM's. To me it's worth the extra money and piece of mind. But that's just me.
 
S

stang74

Member
Feb 12, 2004
76
0
6
NV
Nov 26, 2004
#44
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #44
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Nov 26, 2004
#45
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #45
i never thought that this thread would continue on so far.

i personally will always stand by synthetics.

Cobra-R's, Mercedes AMG, Dodge Viper and Corvettes are all factory filled with synthetic for a reason.

I doubt that these auto manufacturers would just fill in synthetic just because. Everything is economics today, so why spend extra money on something that is supposedly the same quality as conventional oil?
 
R

raykrv6a

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
153
0
0
Maple Grove, MN
Nov 26, 2004
#46
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #46
Mobil 1's formula has been upgraded a number of times since it first came out. In the oil tests I've read, it's near the top in vicosity retention. Petroleum oils start degrading in 1500-1700 miles. If your changing at 3k, probably not a big difference.

It seems Mobil 1 is especially good at preventing wear during cold starts and extreme loads for more miles then petroleum oil. The difference is price over conventional oil is only 200-300 bucks if your doing it yourself.

Another oil that had high marks for vicosity retention is Shell Rotella.
 

ShadowGT

New Member
Dec 10, 2002
202
0
0
Western Kentucky
Nov 26, 2004
#47
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #47
Everything you need to know can be found right here:

http://www.nordicgroup.us/oil.htm#Problems with Coffee
 
D

drummer

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
84
0
0
Nov 26, 2004
#48
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #48
Synthetic oil increases horsepower too as it minimizes friction.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 26, 2004
#49
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #49
Big Steve said:
Good, bad, or indifferent--

What really sold me on synthetic was the difference on cold (below 20degrees) startups. My old 5.0's would crank real slow and the engine would labor upon startup. Not so with synthetic. They would start as if if were 60 out. I also noticed decreased oil useage at high RPM's. To me it's worth the extra money and piece of mind. But that's just me.
Click to expand...
Exactly. I respect your opinion. These oil threads become more of an opinion based "well this is the best so I'll use it," rather than, "well, what would be best for me - economically versus performance?" If some don't have to think that way, then god bless them. My pockets certainly aren't that deep. Christ, I'm a college kid and I already have to think that way. I don't have any bills to pay and I already think that way.

I'll continue lurking to keep playing the devil's advocate.

Joe
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 26, 2004
#50
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #50
I'll ask this (hypothetical) question to you guys. When I asked my fellow synthetic loving pushrod guys, I got never got an answer. For some of you mod motor guys, you may not understand.

What if I'm running Mobil 1. I go 5000 miles in between oil changes and I drive the car daily.

The motor for some strange reason, runs dirty. It fills the oil filter (which would have been changed at 3000 miles with a conventional oil) and soon skanks up the motor. A little piece of chit clogs a lifter and causes it to collapse. That collapsed lifter causes carnage - doing something like beating the cam in the tunnel or allowing the pushrod to jump around and a valve wacks a piston.

Could this have been prevented running the basic 3k mile oil change interval with conventional oil? Is the risk of running past 3k miles with a synthetic oil worth it?



Joe
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 26, 2004
#51
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #51
twogts4us said:
OK, you're right - it's all a scam.
Click to expand...
As oppose to being a sucker plopping down my hard earned bread on this “so called superior protection 99% of their manufactures claim?” I’d rather be a rich willingly ignorant fool, than a broke gullible sheep!

Just because it’s endorsed by….well, the people who make it and or sell it? I’m not saying it’s a scam, The scam is not the product, the scam is the way it’s being marketed! It’s not a necessity, nor is it a magic ingredient that’s going to double the life of you’re engine, give you an additional 20hp or an additional 5mpg, like a lot of their manufactures would have you believe! I agree that their usage in extreme climate is warranted. If you look back in this thread, I already noted that. What I’m saying is, that for your average every day car, it’s not worth the extra money. It’s like $10,000.00 worth of forged internals into an engine that’s only gonna see 5,000RPM! If synthetic oil was so superior and conventional oil so inferior, you would be forced by car manufacturers to use it or risk being denied warranty claims. But over the last couple of years, just the opposite has happened. Many car manufactures not only continue to endorse the use of conventional oil, but now state that instead of every 3,000-miles between oil changes, you may now change your oil every 5,000-miles.

What were they thinking?
 
R

raykrv6a

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
153
0
0
Maple Grove, MN
Nov 27, 2004
#52
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #52
Joes95GT said:
I'll ask this (hypothetical) question to you guys. When I asked my fellow synthetic loving pushrod guys, I got never got an answer. For some of you mod motor guys, you may not understand.

What if I'm running Mobil 1. I go 5000 miles in between oil changes and I drive the car daily.

The motor for some strange reason, runs dirty. It fills the oil filter (which would have been changed at 3000 miles with a conventional oil) and soon skanks up the motor. A little piece of chit clogs a lifter and causes it to collapse. That collapsed lifter causes carnage - doing something like beating the cam in the tunnel or allowing the pushrod to jump around and a valve wacks a piston.

Could this have been prevented running the basic 3k mile oil change interval with conventional oil? Is the risk of running past 3k miles with a synthetic oil worth it?



Joe
Click to expand...

When I read a bunch of oil tests, I also looked into filters. Big difference in filters between brands. A lot of filters won't flow oil when cold and the bypass valve kicks in to bypass the element until the oil warms up.

First time I heard of a piece of dirt large enough to prevent a lifter from pumping up. Must be pretty gunked up.
 
R

raykrv6a

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
153
0
0
Maple Grove, MN
Nov 27, 2004
#53
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #53
Gearbanger 101 said:
As oppose to being a sucker plopping down my hard earned bread on this “so called superior protection 99% of their manufactures claim?” I’d rather be a rich willingly ignorant fool, than a broke gullible sheep!

Just because it’s endorsed by….well, the people who make it and or sell it? I’m not saying it’s a scam, The scam is not the product, the scam is the way it’s being marketed! It’s not a necessity, nor is it a magic ingredient that’s going to double the life of you’re engine, give you an additional 20hp or an additional 5mpg, like a lot of their manufactures would have you believe! I agree that their usage in extreme climate is warranted. If you look back in this thread, I already noted that. What I’m saying is, that for your average every day car, it’s not worth the extra money. It’s like $10,000.00 worth of forged internals into an engine that’s only gonna see 5,000RPM! If synthetic oil was so superior and conventional oil so inferior, you would be forced by car manufacturers to use it or risk being denied warranty claims. But over the last couple of years, just the opposite has happened. Many car manufactures not only continue to endorse the use of conventional oil, but now state that instead of every 3,000-miles between oil changes, you may now change your oil every 5,000-miles.

What were they thinking?
Click to expand...

Ok. I would agree that not all engines would benefit from synthetic oil.

But my 04 GT 4.6 2V comes from the factory with Motorcraft SAE 5W-20 Premium Synthetic Blend Motor oil and Mobil 1 Synthetic tranny fluid. So, I'm going with the synthetics for my changes.
 

Seraphitia102

will post boobie pics for a supercharger
Oct 11, 2004
737
1
16
California
Nov 27, 2004
#54
  • Nov 27, 2004
  • #54
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
459
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Engine Ran my code reader and
  • Mindseye007
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
612
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 19, 2024
Mindseye007
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
911
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine What engine oil are you running in your foxbody?
  • Mindseye007
  • Dec 9, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 5, 2024
limp
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?