• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Take me to intake school...JLT vs. KN

  • Thread starter Thread starter supastang03
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
May 23, 2007
#21
  • May 23, 2007
  • #21
Kilgore Trout said:
So you are saying the gains are minimal and he should instead spend some money on something that also produces minimal gains?
Click to expand...

Are the gains minimal? Yes. But he already has a K&N, and if you get any noticable power out of an intake, its probably from the filter more than anything else. The stock intake tubing is plenty large enough for a near stock GT. The TB/Plenum combo would run around the same price, maybe a little more than a pretty intake. Gears would be a better option, but most end up paying extra for the install. I was only trying to reference him to a bolt on similar in price.
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
May 23, 2007
#22
  • May 23, 2007
  • #22
i have 3.73s and an xcal2 on the way....those would def. be my next mods.

wouldnt the TB/P combo be closer to 400...not 200...?

TB~200
P~200
 

StangYellow

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
1,052
1
39
May 24, 2007
#23
  • May 24, 2007
  • #23
My recommendation is to get a CAI off ebay for 40 bucks. Why people spend 250 for a "JLP, BBK, K&N" is beyond me. Its a piece of pipe with an air filter, plastic pipes shouldn't cost two hundred dollars. Its like buying a watch. You can buy one for $60 or buy one for $600 and brag about the name etched on the watch that only YOU can see.
 

Stangsgrl

Member
Mar 13, 2004
132
1
18
Mesa, AZ
May 24, 2007
#24
  • May 24, 2007
  • #24
^ I just bought my JLT for the looks since I show it...
Makes the engine look nice instead of some metal pipe or that crappy way the stock one looks IMO

does give it a nice whine...i've had a few ask if i have a s/c from car people...haha
 

StangYellow

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
1,052
1
39
May 24, 2007
#25
  • May 24, 2007
  • #25
A whine.... from an intake pipe...asking if its supercharged?
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
May 24, 2007
#26
  • May 24, 2007
  • #26
5.0 Mustang mag has an article in their new edition where they did some basic bolt ons to a 2003 vert with 5 speed. They added a Cherry bomb cat, Accufab TB, JLT RAI, March pulleys and used a Diablosport Tune.

Before installation the car put out 213.97 RWHP. They then showed the improvement with each addition, the JLT added 3.59 RWHP after the cat and TB were added. All together they added 32.82 RWHP with this setup. The biggest gain was made with the TB adding 16.25 RWHP.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
May 24, 2007
#27
  • May 24, 2007
  • #27
I had this problem last year and looked at both of those companys and wound up getting a Tunable Induction instead of the JLT or K&N

www.demolet.com
 

javsvt

Member
Jun 10, 2005
27
0
7
Westchester County NY
May 24, 2007
#28
  • May 24, 2007
  • #28
DropTopPony said:
I had this problem last year and looked at both of those companys and wound up getting a Tunable Induction instead of the JLT or K&N

www.demolet.com
Click to expand...
X2, I absolutely love mine.
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
May 25, 2007
#29
  • May 25, 2007
  • #29
very nice...but sooooo expensive..
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
May 25, 2007
#30
  • May 25, 2007
  • #30
Wolvrin704 said:
5.0 Mustang mag has an article in their new edition where they did some basic bolt ons to a 2003 vert with 5 speed. They added a Cherry bomb cat, Accufab TB, JLT RAI, March pulleys and used a Diablosport Tune.

Before installation the car put out 213.97 RWHP. They then showed the improvement with each addition, the JLT added 3.59 RWHP after the cat and TB were added. All together they added 32.82 RWHP with this setup. The biggest gain was made with the TB adding 16.25 RWHP.
Click to expand...


just a TB...no plenum??

wouldnt you need to have a TB and plenum setup to see any gains, not just a TB....?
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
May 25, 2007
#31
  • May 25, 2007
  • #31
supastang03 said:
just a TB...no plenum??

wouldnt you need to have a TB and plenum setup to see any gains, not just a TB....?
Click to expand...

I stand corrected.

I had to go back and recheck and you are correct, its a TB and plenum. All told they spent $1672.94 for 32 HP.

With all that said I too will be buying a JLT CAI within the next month. While I know the prerformance gain is minimal I like the looks of it. Plus I am planning on making my car faster N/A before I supercharge it, so more than likely will be adding some of the same items as in the article.
 

Stangsgrl

Member
Mar 13, 2004
132
1
18
Mesa, AZ
May 25, 2007
#32
  • May 25, 2007
  • #32
StangYellow said:
A whine.... from an intake pipe...asking if its supercharged?
Click to expand...


maybe my tb/plenum accentuates it more but there is a "whine" which I didn't think was that loud. he heard it over mine and his ws6 exhaust.

but i do like my JLT

 

40th GT

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
916
0
0
Lawrenceville, GA
May 25, 2007
#33
  • May 25, 2007
  • #33
Wolvrin704 said:
5.0 Mustang mag has an article in their new edition where they did some basic bolt ons to a 2003 vert with 5 speed. They added a Cherry bomb cat, Accufab TB, JLT RAI, March pulleys and used a Diablosport Tune.

Before installation the car put out 213.97 RWHP. They then showed the improvement with each addition, the JLT added 3.59 RWHP after the cat and TB were added. All together they added 32.82 RWHP with this setup. The biggest gain was made with the TB adding 16.25 RWHP.
Click to expand...

214whp with a 5 speed PI GT? I'm not questioning your facts but that seems kinda low/disappointing. Is this the average hp # for our cars?
 

AmericanMetal

New Member
Mar 23, 2006
4
0
0
Music City, TN
May 25, 2007
#34
  • May 25, 2007
  • #34
I put a K&N FIPK onto a stock tb/plenum. It made a louder air "whooshing" sound but didn't really notice much more power in and of itself. It did look like it provided way better airflow than the stock setup, which mattered to me because I'm slowly building up with bolt-ons before eventually going whole hog with a Procharger and I want the basics optimized first.

Next I replaced the stock setup with an Accufab 75 mm tb/plenum and a spacer. Now there was a MUCH more noticeable difference!! So the K&N could very well have been trying to help, but with the tiny intake in back of it, the benefit went unnoticed until enlarging the tb & plenum.

On the con side: I also had to leave off the bottom bracket due to rubbing, but it seems to hold on ok with just the one bracket. The black plastic isn't the most attractive thing in the world, especially with the polished stuff next to it, but at least there are no heat retention issues.

So I don't regret spending on the FIPK; it's one more component that I don't have to worry will create a bottleneck when it finally gets blown.
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
May 25, 2007
#35
  • May 25, 2007
  • #35
hmm well im still wanting that JLT...i think i just really like the looks.
 
S

steve_stang2003

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
195
1
0
May 25, 2007
#36
  • May 25, 2007
  • #36
Stangsgrl said:
^ I just bought my JLT for the looks since I show it...
Makes the engine look nice instead of some metal pipe or that crappy way the stock one looks IMO

does give it a nice whine...i've had a few ask if i have a s/c from car people...haha
Click to expand...


So does my wife.....Whine that is......

In hindsight, the CAI would have been a heck of a lot cheaper
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
May 25, 2007
#37
  • May 25, 2007
  • #37
40th GT said:
214whp with a 5 speed PI GT? I'm not questioning your facts but that seems kinda low/disappointing. Is this the average hp # for our cars?
Click to expand...

I've been wondering on that as well since I've heard allot of guys on here saying 230+ with a 5 speed. But I got the numbers directly from the mag.
 

Silvergto2

Member
Jun 8, 2005
179
1
16
UTAH
May 28, 2007
#38
  • May 28, 2007
  • #38
Wolvrin704 said:
I've been wondering on that as well since I've heard allot of guys on here saying 230+ with a 5 speed. But I got the numbers directly from the mag.
Click to expand...

I had my bone stock mustang dyno'd @ 216 RWHP. The guys at the shop that dyno'd my car said that was right where it should be for a bone stock Mustang GT in UTAH (Altitude).
 

Ordie

Member
Nov 23, 2004
0
0
7
Key West, FL
May 29, 2007
#39
  • May 29, 2007
  • #39
I dynoed mine

227.5 RWHP

Drop in K&N .. and some crappy exhaust set up the previous owner did, flowmaster mufflers welded into the stock pipes..
 

supastang03

Member
Mar 17, 2004
214
0
16
Miami/Gainesville UF
May 29, 2007
#40
  • May 29, 2007
  • #40
sooo i ordered the JLT from moranoracing.com

only 199...best price ive found (theyre around 220 everywhere else)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
306
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
G
2016 GT, Cold Air/Tune Trouble (overheating) . Advice/Help Please!
  • GLStang
  • Sep 6, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
338
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
302
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
S
01 GT NO IDLE
  • Scwhitten
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
230
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
258
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?