swingline said:
Why would he need a bigger cam if the heads were already flowing too much for the motor they were on? Sorry if the answer is obvious but I am new to this stuff.
With a 1.90 valved AFR or E-Brock head, the velocity is going to be easy to attain because the port volumes are relatively small. On a ported TFS head with a 2.02 intake valve, valve timing needs to be much different.
An AFR or E-Brock headed car can have an IVO (intake valve opening) event at anywhere from 10* to 0* BTDC. An opened up TFS head will have an IVO of something like 8* ATDC. Why, do you ask? That's anywhere between 8-18* of difference?
On the intake stroke (when the air travels into the cylinder), only the intake valve is open. This (IVO) can sometimes start late into the exhaust stroke, but it happens primarily during the intake stroke, and that's what I'll concentrate on. On the intake stroke, the piston is traveling down in the bore, allowing air to come in. Because the ports are so large, air gets lazy in those ports and isn't rushing into the heads. This is fixed by having a late IVO. Imagine the piston going from TDC and traveling 8* down the bore and the intake valve is not open. What happens? It creates a suction-type force, that actually
pulls the air down into the cylinder once the intake valve is cracked (IVO). Instead of velocity happening naturally like in the AFR and Edelbrock heads, it has to be forced with camshaft timing. This creates a huge vacuum-like affect and speeds up airflow all throughout the intake tract, making up for the velocity that isn't occuring "naturally."
Sorry if I confused anyone. I'm not a good describer. Tell me if you don't get it and I'll try again.
Joe - You've got a PM coming...
Joe