Thanks 5.0 mustang and Super fords magazine!!!

Just got mine in the mail today. I was looking forward to it, but i gues whoever wrote the article has no idea of what the good points of the 94-95 are. Also they made it sound like swapping to an earlier EEC was better, but from what i have been told by all the knowledgable people with tuning ours is better in just about everyway, which is why it is more sensitive to changes. I was looking forward to the article but after reading it dont think it was a good informing article for people who have never dealt with these cars.
 
I haven't read it, but wow, sounds pretty bad. I just don't understand how they could label us as the bastard child of mustangs. The only thing I can think of is maybe since you can do the PI conversion on the early 4.6's, so they lost respect for our cars? While I know a lot of people have problems with the eec, besides some small idle problems, I really haven't had to many issues. Once the vortech is finished though, I might run into problems. If the article is that bad, hopefully another mag might do something similar except highlighting the good points.
 
Swarzkopf said:
YEAH! No **** man...I really can't figure out why the 94-95 has gotten this stigma recently.

Yesterday I pulled up to a light, between an Accord coupe with four fart pipes and ground effects and an LS1 T/A.

Two dues in the Accord. I overhead the following exchange:

"I'm a ****in' smoke both they asses!"
"Naw, but I think joo at least gonna smoke the Mustang!"

NO RESPECT FOR US!

LOL
so, what happened when the light turned green? u cant leave us hanging like that.
 
LOL!

No street racing is allowed to be posted here...if you're curious, there is a thread in my forum (linked from pic in sig) called "My Street Racing Dominance Begins: T/A and Accord See Mustang Tails" with lots of details. :D