without any comp tuning my cobra went the times in the sig. although when i put it on the dyno, the a/f is 11.5:1, i pulled out a couple psi but i dont think anything has changed.
Just got mine in the mail today. I was looking forward to it, but i gues whoever wrote the article has no idea of what the good points of the 94-95 are. Also they made it sound like swapping to an earlier EEC was better, but from what i have been told by all the knowledgable people with tuning ours is better in just about everyway, which is why it is more sensitive to changes. I was looking forward to the article but after reading it dont think it was a good informing article for people who have never dealt with these cars.
I haven't read it, but wow, sounds pretty bad. I just don't understand how they could label us as the bastard child of mustangs. The only thing I can think of is maybe since you can do the PI conversion on the early 4.6's, so they lost respect for our cars? While I know a lot of people have problems with the eec, besides some small idle problems, I really haven't had to many issues. Once the vortech is finished though, I might run into problems. If the article is that bad, hopefully another mag might do something similar except highlighting the good points.
No street racing is allowed to be posted here...if you're curious, there is a thread in my forum (linked from pic in sig) called "My Street Racing Dominance Begins: T/A and Accord See Mustang Tails" with lots of details.