• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

The Next Warhorse: 1993 Mustang LX Autocross Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warhorse Racing
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2022
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Jan 2, 2022
#1
  • Jan 2, 2022
  • #1
It’s time to build THE NEXT WARHORSE!

I’ve been autocrossing my 1992 GT, 2000 GT, and 2004 V6 for years, and I’ve been sharing my experience on my Warhorse Racing YouTube channel. I’ve made it my mission to prove that any 79-04 Mustang can be built into a capable and competitive autocross car.

I’ve been fortunate to win several local championships in my V8 and V6 cars. When it came time to decide on a new long-term project, I wanted a challenge. So, I thought outside the box when choosing this Fox Body.

The tips and tech in this series will help anyone building a 79-04 Mustang for autocross. If you have any questions, please ask here or in the comments on YouTube. I’m always happy to help.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7TEuftCP1U&t
 
Reactions: gkomo

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jan 2, 2022
#2
  • Jan 2, 2022
  • #2
Thanks for the time you put in to share!
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Jan 2, 2022
#3
  • Jan 2, 2022
  • #3
7991LXnSHO said:
Thanks for the time you put in to share!
Click to expand...
I really enjoy making the videos. I just hope they're helping people.
 

Cheapskate207

The left one hangs a little lower
5 Year Member
Jan 12, 2020
761
541
113
Maine
Jan 3, 2022
#4
  • Jan 3, 2022
  • #4
Looks like a clean car! Calypso Green is my favorite foxbody color. I subscribed to you channel and will follow along.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Jan 3, 2022
#5
  • Jan 3, 2022
  • #5
Cheapskate207 said:
Looks like a clean car! Calypso Green is my favorite foxbody color. I subscribed to you channel and will follow along.
Click to expand...
The car is in pretty good shape with relatively low miles. There's some faded paint and a few mechanical issues, but it's a solid car. Thanks for subscribing! I've got some cool mods in store for this long-term project, and I hope people will enjoy watching its progress!
 
Reactions: General karthief

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Jan 29, 2022
#6
  • Jan 29, 2022
  • #6
Before I start tearing into my 1993 2.3L Mustang autocross project, I want to go over what I’m starting with. This video shows all the good and bad aspects of my new pony.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B52g1iJM4Mw
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,959
10,600
203
polk county florida
Jan 29, 2022
#7
  • Jan 29, 2022
  • #7
Crazy like a fox on quaaludes!!
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Feb 11, 2022
#8
  • Feb 11, 2022
  • #8
Very cool, I am interested in the outcome. I've been solidly focusing on what I need to do to make mine handle better and weigh less first before any consideration for engine stuff... 351, 302, LS? ( ), Turbo... stay NA? Not 100% which way to go but...

Staying NA is the easiest and letting this just be a fun top down cruiser that can go around a corner is very tempting. At some point I also asked myself why does everything I build have to be "fast"? The only motivator at this point to put in a V8 would be the exhaust note.
 
Last edited: Feb 11, 2022

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Feb 11, 2022
#9
  • Feb 11, 2022
  • #9
This is pretty neat and can't wait to see where it goes
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Feb 11, 2022
#10
  • Feb 11, 2022
  • #10
ChillPhatCat said:
Very cool, I am interested in the outcome. I've been solidly focusing on what I need to do to make mine handle better and weigh less first before any consideration for engine stuff... 351, 302, LS? ( ), Turbo... stay NA? Not 100% which way to go but...

Staying NA is the easiest and letting this just be a fun top down cruiser that can go around a corner is very tempting. At some point I also asked myself why does everything I build have to be "fast"? The only motivator at this point to put in a V8 would be the exhaust note.
Click to expand...
The first phase of my 2.3L project will be weight reduction. I'm hoping to get about 500 lbs. out of the car before adding the major suspension mods (they will add weight). My next few videos should help you decide what you're willing to remove from your car to get it lighter.

If you watch the "Budget Autocross" playlist and the "ThoroughbRED" Suspension videos on my channel, you'll get a good start on making your car handle better. If you ever have any questions about suspension, I'm always happy to help.

Horsepower doesn't matter as much for autocross. My 220 hp 2004 V6 was faster than a lot of V8 Mustangs at my local events. A car with the right suspension and proper suspension adjustments can be very competitive.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Feb 11, 2022
#11
  • Feb 11, 2022
  • #11
Boostedpimp said:
This is pretty neat and can't wait to see where it goes
Click to expand...
Thanks! It's going to be a fun project.
 
Reactions: Boostedpimp

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Feb 11, 2022
#12
  • Feb 11, 2022
  • #12
Warhorse Racing said:
The first phase of my 2.3L project will be weight reduction. I'm hoping to get about 500 lbs. out of the car before adding the major suspension mods (they will add weight). My next few videos should help you decide what you're willing to remove from your car to get it lighter.

If you watch the "Budget Autocross" playlist and the "ThoroughbRED" Suspension videos on my channel, you'll get a good start on making your car handle better. If you ever have any questions about suspension, I'm always happy to help.

Horsepower doesn't matter as much for autocross. My 220 hp 2004 V6 was faster than a lot of V8 Mustangs at my local events. A car with the right suspension and proper suspension adjustments can be very competitive.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah absolutely. My previous stang was a geared ‘00 GT… It moved out quite well. But I took it to an AutoX event just to see what it was about and there was a Miata and a NA MR2 mopping up. It was an eye opener for sure.

So far I’ve pulled out the defunct AC stuff from under the hood and it’s got a cylindrical air filter straight on the TB instead of that big huge air box. And when I bought it already didn’t have the jack or spare. I’d say it’s a good 80 lb lighter than stock at the moment.
 
Last edited: Feb 11, 2022

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Feb 12, 2022
#13
  • Feb 12, 2022
  • #13
ChillPhatCat said:
Oh yeah absolutely. My previous stang was a geared ‘00 GT… It moved out quite well. But I took it to an AutoX event just to see what it was about and there was a Miata and a NA MR2 mopping up. It was an eye opener for sure.

So far I’ve pulled out the defunct AC stuff from under the hood and it’s got a cylindrical air filter straight on the TB instead of that big huge air box. And when I bought it already didn’t have the jack or spare. I’d say it’s a good 80 lb lighter than stock at the moment.
Click to expand...
It's amazing how much weight is hiding in these cars. And there are so many lightweight parts available. I'm really excited to see how light I can get mine, and how it feels out on course.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Feb 28, 2022
#14
  • Feb 28, 2022
  • #14
It’s time to start taking weight out of my 1993 2.3L Mustang autocross car. There’s a lot of weight hiding in the interior of Fox Body Mustangs that’s free or inexpensive to remove. In this video, I strip out the interior pieces that won’t be going back into the car and weigh the OEM interior parts that can be swapped for lighter alternatives.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lgAEjurJ1o&t
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Mar 1, 2022
#15
  • Mar 1, 2022
  • #15
Good stuff, thanks for sharing. Looking forward to the zone 1 info. I just acquired a Ranger header for my car... piece one of the exhaust. Supposed to be worlds lighter than the OEM iron manifold. My car was already stripped of everything but the carpet in the trunk so I've already got zone 3 taken care of.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Mar 1, 2022
#16
  • Mar 1, 2022
  • #16
Thank you! The Ranger header should be about 14 lbs. lighter than the OEM manifold. I've started taking weight out of Zone 1 and I will put together a video about what parts I removed and how much they weigh soon.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Mar 5, 2022
#17
  • Mar 5, 2022
  • #17
Warhorse Racing said:
Thank you! The Ranger header should be about 14 lbs. lighter than the OEM manifold. I've started taking weight out of Zone 1 and I will put together a video about what parts I removed and how much they weigh soon.
Click to expand...
14 lbs. seems like a lot. I did that swap on mine. It is lighter, but I'd estimate 5 lbs difference at most.
 

Warhorse Racing

5 Year Member
Feb 10, 2019
362
208
63
United States
Mar 5, 2022
#18
  • Mar 5, 2022
  • #18
91TwighlightGT said:
14 lbs. seems like a lot. I did that swap on mine. It is lighter, but I'd estimate 5 lbs difference at most.
Click to expand...
I've been working on removing weight from under the hood for an upcoming video. According to my digital scale, the Ranger header is 13.9 lbs. lighter than the OEM manifold. I always weigh everything 3 times to make certain I'm providing an accurate weight. The OEM header on my car weighs 22.9 lbs., the Ranger header weighs 9 lbs.
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Mar 5, 2022
#19
  • Mar 5, 2022
  • #19
I'd be interested to see that video when you post it. For reference, swapping from a steel hatch to a fiberglass hatch was about a 20 lbs. weight savings on a pretty large part when I measured it.

Still, I'll be interested to see your data on it.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Mar 5, 2022
#20
  • Mar 5, 2022
  • #20
For what it’s worth there appear to be several variants of the ranger “header”. Some are probably heavier than others. I bought the thing mainly to clean up the engine compartment cheaply… Any weight out of the front is just an added bonus.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Eastern North Carolina Autocross Events!
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
373
Regional Forums and Event Information Feb 23, 2026
Warhorse Racing
Warhorse Racing YT Channel
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Aug 19, 2024
  • Stangnet Television
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
2K
Stangnet Television Apr 16, 2026
Warhorse Racing
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 6:21 PM
AeroCoupe
Event Information! 79-04 Mustangs Wanted at the THSCC Autocross Novice School on 3/25 in Rockingham, NC
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 13, 2023
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
6
Views
2K
Regional Forums and Event Information Jul 1, 2025
Robman8028
R
S
83GT Stocker build
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 19, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 1, 2024
StockerStang
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?