You tards read way too much into my posts and try to put words in my mouth.
I wasnt comparing the talent of Big Ben and Brady. All I said was they were both put into awesome positions with really good overall teams from their first year on which gave tremendous advantages to win their rings.
Manning was not put into that same situation, yes the offense was great, but up until last years playoffs the defense had been terrible. Look what happend when Manning finally got some help on the defensive side of the ball.
Its obvious that Manning and Brady are the two best QBs. I have never said anything different.
Tards!!!!! You the one that said Bledsoe was 5 years past his prime when he was 29 years old. and you call us the tards

We have to read into what you are saying?? Are we supposed to disregard stuff you say???
I disagree about your comments that the patriots would have won with many other qb's that what you said and I think it's wrong.
I pointed out how they had another QB ( bledsoe) who was a number 1 overall and in the prime of his career and they sucked with him and instantly became a superbowl winner with brady..
BTW Bledsoe had his best season the year after he was ran out of town and went to buffalo, so I find it hard to see your point that Bledsoe was 5 years past prime.
What I see is a Rookie brady was 5 times better than a in his prime Bledsoe.
and the chargers were 0-1
Thats a good way of looking at it, I never thought of it that way before.
jesus christ give it up 

