• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Throttle body

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeftOvers
  • Start date Start date Feb 17, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

LeftOvers

Member
Nov 27, 2005
44
0
6
Feb 17, 2007
#1
  • Feb 17, 2007
  • #1
Ive been looking at the BBk 62 MM throttle body for my 05 GT and ive found some other things like throttle body spacers. Whats the difference? they each say about 10 hp gain and what not and the prices are alot different. around 300 for the throttle body and 90 for the spacer can someone shed some light on this for me?
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
Maryland
Feb 17, 2007
#2
  • Feb 17, 2007
  • #2
Please don't waste your money on a throttle body for that car. I've got friend pushing 800 rwhp and one that's over 1000 rwhp and they both use the stock TB. If you search around on the forums enough you will find that guys that tune these cars say the same thing. The stock throttle body has no obvious shortcomings.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Feb 17, 2007
#3
  • Feb 17, 2007
  • #3
One of the Mustang magazines reported a 80 HP gain when they stepped up throttle body size on a supercharged application. I dunno if this is true, but it's what they reported.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 17, 2007
#4
  • Feb 17, 2007
  • #4
Although I can't speak from personal experience ? I can tell you that Doug from bamachips.com does not recommend throttle body spacers and considers them as a complete waste of both time and money...For the very same $90-100 bucks ? you would be much better off spending it on mods such as FRPP delete plates that are both proven and guaranteed to provide between 8-10 additional HP...Therefore IMHO ? the FRPP delete plates would be your best bang for the buck mod under $100.00
 
N

NorthwestGT

New Member
Jan 11, 2006
177
0
0
Pasco, WA
Feb 18, 2007
#5
  • Feb 18, 2007
  • #5
I'll tell you one more thing about aftermarket throttle bodies. They will not work as well as your FOMOCO original. I had a TB on my '96 from a reputable aftermarket supplier and had nothing but trouble with it. Couldn't get a stable idle, bad cruise control, and worst of all, no noticeable gain at all. The cruise contol issue will not be a problem with the S197's, but I will bet you will have the other problems I mentioned.

Other mods have shown proven gains with our cars, even in normally aspirated setup. CAI's, tuners, or a little from underdrives and axle-backs. All of these are in the price range of a TB. As for the spacer, as was said, not worth the bucks.
 

burke07gtcs

New Member
Jan 14, 2007
64
0
0
Farmington NM
Feb 18, 2007
#6
  • Feb 18, 2007
  • #6
The throttle body holds the rpm's up when you push the clutch. No noticible gain w/ mine. Delete plates or custom tune work very well.
 
L

LeftOvers

Member
Nov 27, 2005
44
0
6
Feb 21, 2007
#7
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #7
So noone really can say yay or nay about it?
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 21, 2007
#8
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #8
If replies such as please don't waste your money and does not recommend interpret as meaning NAY ?...then explain just exactly what does...
 

07USAFGT

New Member
Jan 20, 2007
4
0
0
Feb 21, 2007
#9
  • Feb 21, 2007
  • #9
+1
 

hottymustang

New Member
Oct 10, 2005
58
0
0
Temecula, CA.
Feb 22, 2007
#10
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #10
I know a few guys that have had relly good luck with the new BBK TB. I know that the earlier models by other brands were having lots of problems.

I will be getting one in the future, but not right now. I think that the TB on this car is one of those mods that has to have the supporting mods before you really see a difference. And by supporting mods I mean Long Tubes, Delete plates, etc....
 
F

fox1x

New Member
Oct 3, 2005
157
0
0
Northwest Ohio
Feb 22, 2007
#11
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #11
MM's & FF's recieved a gain from the BBK before and after a supercharger install (Vortech) They even have a video of the install and dyno test. The video came on a DVD with one of their issues. (Last 2 months)
 
J

johnnys06redgt

New Member
Aug 29, 2006
7
0
0
ct
Feb 24, 2007
#12
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #12
yowser
 
U

Umbra_Lupis

New Member
Oct 7, 2006
24
0
0
Feb 24, 2007
#13
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #13
"With no other change except the addition of the BBK Throttle Body our GT jumped to 347 rwhp and 326 ft. lbs. of torque. Just to confirm the gain we put the stock throttle body back on and power fell back to 340 then reinstalled the BBK to see power jump again to 347 rwhp. "

from brenspeed. had cams, exhaust, cai, tune etc etc.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Feb 24, 2007
#14
  • Feb 24, 2007
  • #14
Umbra_Lupis said:
"With no other change except the addition of the BBK Throttle Body our GT jumped to 347 rwhp and 326 ft. lbs. of torque. Just to confirm the gain we put the stock throttle body back on and power fell back to 340 then reinstalled the BBK to see power jump again to 347 rwhp. "

from brenspeed. had cams, exhaust, cai, tune etc etc.
Click to expand...

if you read the entire article from brenspeed, you will notice that they did this as one of the last mods. this and the racer version of the C&L intake. without the cams or a power adder, you wont see nearly this gain.
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
Feb 25, 2007
#15
  • Feb 25, 2007
  • #15
So I shouldn't waste my time with a throttle body at all is the impression I'm getting. I've been looking on Ebay and some other sites to see about getting one because of the relative ease of installation and power increases. The two I was looking at were the BBK and the GMS, both can be seen here http://www.americanmuscle.com/05-07-mustang-throttle-bodies.html
 

hags1

New Member
Aug 18, 2005
9
0
0
Mar 1, 2007
#16
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #16
Ouch....$450 for the GMS TB....

If your not doing your cams over then the regular TB is good to go.
If your going to do the cams and go with a larger MAF meter then the TB will provide some more H.P.

hags1
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
Mar 1, 2007
#17
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #17
Oh I can get them for like 1/2 that on ebay, I just used that link to provide the two I've seen and the only two for that matter.
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Mar 1, 2007
#18
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #18
only tb I would get would be the bbk
 

ufnavy06

Member
May 23, 2006
292
0
16
Jacksonville, Florida
Mar 1, 2007
#19
  • Mar 1, 2007
  • #19
I'd hope you'd recommend it since you have it
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Mar 2, 2007
#20
  • Mar 2, 2007
  • #20
well I had the LFP and it was a POS
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
461
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Fox 329 HP low for a stroker?
  • Andresquintana.mma
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
2
Running very very rich
  • 2esoteric
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
305
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
570
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?