• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Thumper/Tmoss/TFS1.....what injectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flavadave4
  • Start date Start date Dec 19, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 19, 2006
#1
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #1
I have a stock bottom end, Thumpers, Tmoss lower and TF stage 1 cam.
I am looking to upgrade the MAF sensor and Throttle body. I was planning on getting a new MAF for 19# injectors but a friend has offerd me a set of 30# injectors and 75MM MAF for a good price.

Are the 30# injectors too large for my setup?
Would my Walbro 155lph keep up with them?

Thanks for the help,:SNSign:
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Dec 19, 2006
#2
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #2
little too big...19's would be right in line IMO.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 19, 2006
#3
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #3
Go with the 30's since its a good deal. They're FAR FAR from "too large".
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 19, 2006
#4
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #4
ok......so i have heard both answers.
Will the MAF curve be too fat for my setup?
 

sirr0bin

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
174
0
0
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Dec 19, 2006
#5
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #5
30lb injectors will be too large for a mild combo like that

The 19lb ones should be fine, can go up to 24lb (and appropriate MAF) if you are worried. 19lb injectors are good till around 300NA horsepower
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Dec 19, 2006
#6
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #6
Grn92LX said:
Go with the 30's since its a good deal. They're FAR FAR from "too large".
Click to expand...

It seems like people here always say that big injectors are never too big. well YES...they ARE too big. Go ahead and slap some 30# on there and see how it runs at low rpm/load and see how easy it is to tune it! Theres only so much FP you can take out.

Thread starter: i would look around for some 24's and matching MAF or just stick with the stockers...they will work fine. Is it a tmoss stock HO intake? what size are the valves in the heads? TFS1 is a fairly mild cam...what rocker ratio? Stock bottom end and fuel system? i would put that combo in the 240-260rwhp range which means just about 300 fwhp....right where the stock 19's approach the limits. Stick with the 19's and spend a little more $$ on a nice MAF...you can always have it re-calibrated. good luck man
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Dec 20, 2006
#7
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #7
Stick with the 19's. Even though its a good deal, they are pretty usless in your situation.
Kevin
 

donsbad68

Immensely Educated
Jan 4, 2003
838
0
0
Oklahoma
Dec 20, 2006
#8
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #8
Keep the 19's they'll be fine
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Dec 20, 2006
#9
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #9
19s are fine for that combo
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Dec 20, 2006
#10
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #10
A 155 will support a very lot of hp NA, around 450rwhp.

The 30's will cause it to be super rich at idle, and be a tuning nightmare.

19's will support close to 290rwhp which you will probably be about 40rwhp short of.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 20, 2006
#11
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #11
Thanks......Next question is what MAF to use.
I have searched this to death and can't seem to find a straight answer of what is the best product out there, Pro-M, C&L and whatever else there may be.

I read bad things about the C&L running a car lean, I guess you can clock them which seems like a PITA

I want plug and play!
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Dec 20, 2006
#12
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #12
80mm PMAS.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Dec 20, 2006
#13
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #13
2000xp8 said:
80mm PMAS.
Click to expand...

i second that I run a 75mm pro-m and my car runs very well. I have heard numerous issues with C&L so i would stay away from them.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Dec 20, 2006
#14
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #14
How does ur car run? reason i ask is b/c i run damn near the same combo. i have thumpers. tmoss but i have a B-cam which isnt too far off from the tfs1.

i run 19lbers, i got the vortech( same thing as C&L) it came with the 19lb sampling tube. people always seemed to complain about c&l stuff. i got mine new for 130 on summit and had no problems at all. the 155 lph will be more than enough, get an adjustable regulator. it helps to fine tune things.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 20, 2006
#15
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #15
Foxfan88 said:
How does ur car run? reason i ask is b/c i run damn near the same combo. i have thumpers. tmoss but i have a B-cam which isnt too far off from the tfs1.

i run 19lbers, i got the vortech( same thing as C&L) it came with the 19lb sampling tube. people always seemed to complain about c&l stuff. i got mine new for 130 on summit and had no problems at all. the 155 lph will be more than enough, get an adjustable regulator. it helps to fine tune things.
Click to expand...


Runs really strong on the street, I haven't had it at the track to see what kind of times I can do with the new parts.

I do have a Adjustable Pressure Regulator, I set it at 40psi with the vac line off and engine warmed and at an idle.

I guess i will look for a Pmas/pro-m.....I have heard good things about them.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Dec 20, 2006
#16
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #16
2000xp8 said:
A 155 will support a very lot of hp NA, around 450rwhp.

The 30's will cause it to be super rich at idle, and be a tuning nightmare.

19's will support close to 290rwhp which you will probably be about 40rwhp short of.
Click to expand...

Im thinking he'll be closer then that. 275? Get an Explorer from Tmoss or a Cobra and youll be close to 300.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Dec 20, 2006
#17
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #17
GTOReturns said:
youll be close to 300.
Click to expand...

Thats being pretty optimistic.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 21, 2006
#18
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #18
I'm sorry that you got some bad information on the 30lb injectors.

I have them, and they are "to big" for my h/c/i combo...I should have gone with 24's.

I say keep your 19's to save money, but if you have to spend....get some 24's and no bigger...good luck!
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Dec 21, 2006
#19
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #19
GTOReturns said:
Im thinking he'll be closer then that. 275? Get an Explorer from Tmoss or a Cobra and youll be close to 300.
Click to expand...

No where near 300 regardless of intake. The intake doesn't make the power, the heads do.
250-260 is likely.
A few people here are in the search for "300rwhp" with E7's, and they are in about as balls deep financially as it gets and still have come up short.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 21, 2006
#20
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #20
Once I have the TB and MAF i was hoping for 260hp. I have read about cars simular to mine in the 270's but I'm not holding my breath!.......I am not really hung up on dyno numbers, I am interested in some quicker times at the track though.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
253
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?