• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Timing-Tune/MPG increase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSSuper455
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2005

JSSuper455

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
197
0
16
UT
Aug 31, 2005
#1
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #1
Folks, I've been doing a lot of budgeting lately for gas and fuel economy and now with expectations of $4/gal gas I've got a question?

I've tuned my car for performance as many of us have. I was thinking that now with gas the way it is, I'll be driving my Mustang more than before because it is the 2nd best fuel economy car I have.

Currently I have the car timed at 11-11.5* as such I can run 88 octane from Chevron and Tesoro (More expensive than Maverik and others) Would returning my car to the factory spec * timing help to improve MPG if at all? or will it simply allow my car to run on the cheaper brands of gas? Also what about changing from my 180* therm back to 195* help MPG.

Also, my chiltons manual doesn't give me the timing spec and my emissions sticker under my hood is gone. As I recall factory timing is 9*BTDC correct?

PS. I did try searching on timing and related, but it didn't return helpful info. I either got about every topic posted or nothing...
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Aug 31, 2005
#2
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #2
Stock is 10*advance.

What car do you have that is worse - a tank? J/K.

You can run the most timing on the lowest octane (87 or greater octane though) for best economy. The increased advance helps economy in my experience (Just dont ping).

As long as you are getting the ECT up to ~178*F, you should be in full CL operation. If you do this with a 180* stat, I dont see the need to swap. The hotter stat is for emissions (but no HC's, per se).

Good luck and bump.
 

JSSuper455

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
197
0
16
UT
Sep 1, 2005
#3
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #3
Thanks for the reply, This topic was based on a debate I had with a friend of mine. I really didn't think it would do anything for me actually.

As far as fuel economy goes, the averages are based on average city/hwy driving.

MPG:
Buick= 31
Mustang= 22
Silverado= 18-19
Cherokee= 17-18
Sport Fury= 16
T/A = 10
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
718
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
289
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
319
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?