• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Tire Size ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Y2K4 STANG
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2006
Y

Y2K4 STANG

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
36
0
0
NEWPORT NEWS VA
Jul 17, 2006
#1
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #1
Is it possible to put 245/50r15 on all four with a 15x7 4.5bs on a 67 coupe with stock suspension? I looked on Dodgestangs chart and did not see this combo. Thank in advance.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Jul 17, 2006
#2
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #2
While not exactly an answer for you...I would just like to confirm your understanding of the following.

1. That a 245 50 15 is 24.7 inches outer diameter which is approx 1 inch +/- smaller diamater than a stock wheel
2. That a 15x7 with 4.5 back spacing will most certainly have hard contact on the upper ball joint/a arm in the front.
 
Y

Y2K4 STANG

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
36
0
0
NEWPORT NEWS VA
Jul 17, 2006
#3
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #3
http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp?action=submit

Not to argue with you but this tire calculator sizes the 185/75r14 at 24.92" and the 245/50r15 at 24.62" which is about 3/8 of an inch. (could be wrong )
To avoid the upper ball joint rub, what size/back space do I need to use? Im trying not to roll the fenders or lower the car. Im looking for a more musclar stance.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Jul 17, 2006
#4
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #4
Rather than using a tire size calculator I simply went to tirerack.com and looked up the specs of a 245/50/15. And since there was only one street tire that was available in that size it was easy to use that number As for stock mustang tire size...I always go by 25.5 because that is what someone else told me. I've never personally seen a mustang with the stock tires on it so I have never been able to confirm personally

With a 7 inch rim you can not go over 4.25 backspacing.

With a shelby drop and proper alignment they might work on the front , however I would suspect the fenders will need to be rolled in the front.


on edit: realized I forgot the words "shelby drop"
 
B

boatillo

New Member
Jun 10, 2006
62
0
0
Jul 17, 2006
#5
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #5
I just put mine on (67 coupe, stock suspension) after following advice from dodgestangs chart and others on various forums. Went 215/60/14 up front and 235/60/14 in back - this is a 14x7 rim with 4.25" backspacing. With that said, the front DID barely rub on the a arm so I ground a coupe mm's of gunk, paint and metal off with my angle grinder and they fit fine. 235's in the back were PERFECT looking, lined up with the outside of the wheel so nicely - but if you wanted to there was still a good bit of room on the inside before it would hit leaf or anything else.



Cliff notes: with 4.25" backspacing you cannot fit larger than 215 in the front without mods. I think it is possible to squeeze 245-255 on the back with this backspace though.
 
Y

Y2K4 STANG

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
36
0
0
NEWPORT NEWS VA
Jul 17, 2006
#6
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #6
Boatillo, you got any pics. I would like to see what it looks like.
Ive heard of people using 225s on the front, do you have to mod it in some way to make them fit? If so, how?
 
B

boatillo

New Member
Jun 10, 2006
62
0
0
Jul 17, 2006
#7
  • Jul 17, 2006
  • #7
Not atm, still detailing engine and all so didn't do any great shots. I will get some posted in this thread for you tomorrow though! Like you, I wanted a nice wide profile compared to what the car had on it before (205/75/14) which were tall and thin. I am VERY happy with the results, makes the car look very tough. I'll get those pics!
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Jul 18, 2006
#8
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #8
Wow, by what yall are saying these 245/40/17 will never work....I have rolled the fenders and used blocks to raise the front end up another 1". I have air shocks on the rear so the 245's are no problem back there.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Jul 18, 2006
#9
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #9
Shakin66 said:
Wow, by what yall are saying these 245/40/17 will never work....I have rolled the fenders and used blocks to raise the front end up another 1". I have air shocks on the rear so the 245's are no problem back there.
Click to expand...

Have faith dude.

I run 245 40 17 on the front of mine without rolled fender lips on a 17x8 wheel with 4.75 BS
I run 255 40 17 on the rear of mine with rolled fender lips on a 17x8 wheel with 4.75 BS


I have the car lowered quite a bit too with 1 inch drop springs and the shelby mod in the front and eye five leafs in the rear. I run edlebrock IAS shock in the front and KYB gas-a-just in the rear. I highly recommend rolling your rear fender lip, ditching the air shocks, and using a 17x8 with the right BS (if you aren't already). You do not need to artificially force the rear end of the car to stay elevated above the tire to run a 245 on the car and sacrafice handling and safety.

Here are my alignment specs that I run that allow me to use my 245s without rolled lips in the front:
Caster: +2.0°
Camber: -1°
Toe: 1/8" in

This is an agreesive alignment, but I drive aggressively. If the car was more of a daily driver I would use and roll the lips if need be.
Caster: +1.5° to +2.5°
Camber: 0 to -.5°
Toe: 1/8" in


Note: Thanks to www.opentrackerracingproducts.com for supplying me an easy reference to pull alignment specs from since I can't remember this crap to save my life
 
J

joe68stang

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
2
0
0
Jul 18, 2006
#10
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #10
I originally had 245x50x16 all around.(68 convertible) the front fenders are rolled and the tire hit only on the drivers side. I installed a package from laural mauntain mustang . 620 ,1" drop springs in the front and 5 leaf mid-eye 1" drop in the back.also did the shelby drop with all new suspension and steering including flaming river steering box. front tires hit worse and the front just was too low. installed 1" spacers on front springs and dropped tire size in the front to 225x50x16. aligned to shelby specs. the car Looks Great and handles even better .it sits about 1/2" higher in the back.
 
B

boatillo

New Member
Jun 10, 2006
62
0
0
Jul 18, 2006
#11
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #11
Heres the promised pictures!



Another



Another

 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Jul 18, 2006
#12
  • Jul 18, 2006
  • #12
Well thats great to hear Dodgestang! When I backed out of the driveway the first time without raising the front that final inch and rolling the fenders it pulled the front fender lip straight down after "lodging" the tire up there..Opps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
92
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
D
New Tires
  • Dave G 2292
  • May 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
223
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 30, 2025
ctandc
C
305-45-17 tires on Pony wheels (17")?
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
362
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2026
limp
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?