• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

TKO fitment

  • Thread starter Thread starter DukeGnarley
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2007

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Aug 27, 2007
#1
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #1
well, i've got myself into a situation. I don't want to move my car into paint until i have everything the way it needs to be to fit a tko. my problem is that i don't have an engine or transmission at the moment, and I can't really swing the $4000 for a TKO swap kit right now.

For those of you who have installed a TKO into a '65-'66, do you think it would be possible to make the necessary modifications to the transmission tunnel without having the transmission? how much did you raise the tunnel and where?

I would also really like to find a cheaper alternative to the TKO, but i can't find anything that will handle the torque levels i'm looking at (360+) and still be a manual with overdrive, so if anyone has any suggestions there that would be great as well.

Thanks,

-duke
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Aug 27, 2007
#2
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #2
We did a 65 Coupe with a TKO 600. I basically cut the tunnel right down the middle with a plazma cutter, then make a perpendicular cut accross the tunnel at each end. Took a cut off wheel and slotted the floor support and heated up the tunnel where I wanted to bend the flap up on each side. What might be easier though would be to just cut the top out of the tunnel completly and remove it. Once we had the trans in place. We heated the flaps up with the torch up above the original bend and folded it back over the trans. Gave us about a half inch clearance. THen bridged the gap with some fitted sheetmetal. I think it will be extreamly difficult to cut you opening without the trans. But you can do it. Just make the hole big enough. You can get the diminsions for the trans of the Hanlon motorsports website. SHould get you close. You can do that work after the car comes back from paint, just need to protect the paint. Obviously not the best option. TO answer you question, we raised the tunnel about three inches. Not sure if I have any pictures anywhere of it or not. Was over a year ago. THe trick of course is to get the trans high enough to get the angle right. You can figure the rear part of the shifter housing will come back at least flush if not a bit more to the rear of the stock opening in the tunnel for the shifter. And offset to the passenger side about an inch or so. SOmeone should have some pictures on here. I'll try and dig up the pictures we took. But I think the customer took them with his camera. Sorry.
http://www.hanlonmotorsports.com/3550.html
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Aug 27, 2007
#3
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #3
For 360 ft lbs, I would bolt in a T5Z and call it a day. They are rated for constant 330 ft lbs, so unless you are abusing the tranny full time, it should do the job. $1400 new from Summit and will bolt in without modification to your tunnel. You may already know this, so apologize if that is the case. Just seems to me like you are about to spend a lot of time, money and perform some major surgery for something that might not be needed. If you are still concerned, you can have G-Force build it to handle 600+ HP for a few bucks and still have a bolt in deal. Just my .02 cents.
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Aug 27, 2007
#4
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #4
I found hacking my tranny tunnel too much work so I left it alone.
Instead I altered the pinion angle on the rear end to achieve the proper driveline angle. Seems to be fine 10 years later. Gotta love TKOs.
 
9

96 DOHC Cobra

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2001
542
0
16
Cerritos, CA
Aug 27, 2007
#5
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #5
The TKO can be bought any day for under $2000. I found a couple of places that are close to $1800. The ccustom crossmember costs about $150. What other parts are needed that'll add up to another $2000?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Aug 27, 2007
#6
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #6
do you guys think a WC T5 (300 ft lbs) would live behind a 360 ft lb 302 for a little while? I'm thinking i can source a used WC t5 with bellhousing block plate and clutch for a few hundred dollars, then upgrade to the gforce gearset later on. (and obviously upgrade the clutch). The engine i've been looking at is the 390hp ford racing one.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Aug 28, 2007
#7
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #7
i should mention that it was an automatic car before i sold the c4.
i was basing the price off of the complete kits i've been looking at. like the one JMC sells which includes.


tko 600

bell housing

engine block plate

clutch

fly wheel

clutch fork

hydraulic clutch kit

cross member

transmission mount

hurst shifter, ball, boot, and bezel

and clutch pedal
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Aug 28, 2007
#8
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #8
2bav8 said:
I found hacking my tranny tunnel too much work so I left it alone.
Instead I altered the pinion angle on the rear end to achieve the proper driveline angle. Seems to be fine 10 years later. Gotta love TKOs.
Click to expand...

4wd guys do it all the time. As long as the angles are complementary there is no problem.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Aug 28, 2007
#9
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #9
2bav8,

do you have any ground clearance or firewall clearance problems?
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Aug 28, 2007
#10
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #10
Nope.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Aug 28, 2007
#11
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #11
2bav8, it might help if you tel him what your ground clearance is. Everyones car is different. What is the distance of the lowest point to the ground?
DukeGnarly, as long as the angles at the U joints are the same, you should have no vibration. Meaning, if the front is +3 the rear should be -3. That being said, the only reason to cut the tunnel to make it easier to achieve the correct angles and to make the rest of the motor and trans sit level. THink about exhaust mainly. Easily overcome, but keep things like that in mind. You will need to shim the rear to balance out the U joint angles. We had to shim that coupe even after cutting the tunnel. Probably was overkill, 1 degree, but the customer is always right...
ALso, it was a coupe. I would not cut a fastback unless a customer demanded it. Too hard to go back once it's done. It would be better to put a G force in a T5 case. But you will not easily break a TKO 600 either.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Aug 28, 2007
#12
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #12
I'm starting to lean towards the gforce T5. not that i don't want to cut and weld, but because i think i can get it done cheaper.

does anyone know where i could order a set of gforce gears? or would i have to order them directly?
 
I

iapexl8r

Member
Apr 1, 2005
254
0
17
Aug 28, 2007
#13
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #13
go gforce you wont reget it. I have a g force behind a 408 that makes 460 rear wheel ftlbs of torque and beat the living hell of it all the time no problems so far 2.5 years chris
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Aug 29, 2007
#14
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #14
http://www.moderndriveline.com/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
2000 GT Mustang - Transmission Cooler to Radiator o-rings
  • Iwarrior
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
163
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 4, 2025
Iwarrior
I
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
316
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
309
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Z
Mt82 install
  • Zach625
  • May 25, 2024
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
715
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 25, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?