• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Too hot of a thermostat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pyroman
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2010
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Feb 7, 2010
#1
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #1
I bought what I think was a 190* thermostat for my 67. My car has a mild 302 roller motor and I went with a hotter than stock thermostat because I had heard the engine will actually run better at higher temperatures. Stock is 160* or 180*? Anyway, what thermostat should I be running? Seems to be the one I have is keeping the engine up past the halfway mark on temperature gauge consistently and it's winter.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 7, 2010
#2
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #2
I asked a Ford engineer this very question, and these engines were designed for optimum performance with the 190°.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 7, 2010
#3
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #3
the stock thermostat is actually 192 degrees, even in 1967.
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Feb 7, 2010
#4
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #4
Hmm, I was thinking I had a hotter than stock thermostat. Maybe it was 195? Well either way it sounds like 190 is the way to go.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Feb 7, 2010
#5
  • Feb 7, 2010
  • #5
IMO
efi motor- 190
carb motor- 160 or 180 depending on where you live
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Feb 8, 2010
#6
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #6
2+2GT said:
I asked a Ford engineer this very question, and these engines were designed for optimum performance with the 190°.
Click to expand...


And the cooling system works better when hotter too.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 8, 2010
#7
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #7
Tanus said:
IMO
efi motor- 190
carb motor- 160 or 180 depending on where you live
Click to expand...

Why would that make a difference?, Besides, my question was asked of a Ford engineer who actually helped design the original Mustang, and he insisted the engine was designed for 190. Fuel efficiency, power, corrosion resistance are all better at 190. And yeah, the radiator works better, and the heater works better at 190.
 
4

4tun8

New Member
May 1, 2006
172
0
0
Classified
Feb 8, 2010
#8
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #8
This would remain the case if the car was kept 100% original in regard to cooling. That means no chinese materials in the radiator, etc etc.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Feb 8, 2010
#9
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #9
2+2GT said:
Why would that make a difference?, Besides, my question was asked of a Ford engineer who actually helped design the original Mustang, and he insisted the engine was designed for 190. Fuel efficiency, power, corrosion resistance are all better at 190. And yeah, the radiator works better, and the heater works better at 190.
Click to expand...
thats why I said IMO = in my opinion. thats what Id do, thread starter can decide for himself
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Feb 8, 2010
#10
  • Feb 8, 2010
  • #10
Tanus said:
thats why I said IMO = in my opinion. thats what Id do, thread starter can decide for himself
Click to expand...

X2, always a pissing contest when this topic comes up. LOL

However, I'd love to see one make more power at 190 vs 160.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Feb 9, 2010
#11
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #11
Power wise I haven't compared directly, but wonder myself. Oil is thinner hotter. cooler should be better, but comes with it's own problems. thicker oil and cooler manifold. I guess it would be better as long as the fuel isn't sticking to the manifold, which I seriously doubt at 160 deg. Not any more than normal for a carb anyways. I go for 180-190. You want the oil hot enough to get rid of the water in the oil.Oil needs to be about 215.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Feb 9, 2010
#12
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #12
4tun8 said:
This would remain the case if the car was kept 100% original in regard to cooling. That means no chinese materials in the radiator, etc etc.
Click to expand...

I was not aware that Chinese brass has a different heat coefficient than American brass.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Feb 9, 2010
#13
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #13
That's because you've never welded Chinese material. Nothing chinese is the same. You can tell instantly if it **** ty metal. Dunno how drastically it would change the coefficient though.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Feb 9, 2010
#14
  • Feb 9, 2010
  • #14
160* is too cold IMO. You are going to see increased engine wear this low. Definately use a thinner oil if you are going to use a 160* T-stat.

Personally, I think 180*-190* is where you want to be. Most newer vehicles are designed to run with the temp in the 210* area.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 10, 2010
#15
  • Feb 10, 2010
  • #15
10secgoal said:
Power wise I haven't compared directly, but wonder myself. Oil is thinner hotter. cooler should be better, but comes with it's own problems. thicker oil and cooler manifold. I guess it would be better as long as the fuel isn't sticking to the manifold, which I seriously doubt at 160 deg. Not any more than normal for a carb anyways. I go for 180-190. You want the oil hot enough to get rid of the water in the oil.Oil needs to be about 215.
Click to expand...

you are right about the oil, but the best performance with gasoline comes when you have ice cold fuel hitting a hot intake floor. that gives you maximum vaporization, and thus best mixture burn in the combustion chambers, which means best overall efficiency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
755
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
J
V-6 thermostatically controlled cooling fan - on when cold - new behaviour
  • jacekk
  • Oct 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
0
Views
172
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Oct 1, 2025
jacekk
J
Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
598
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
698
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
R
Engine Fox body doesn’t run hot until I start driving
  • Rose5oh
  • Mar 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?