• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Torque ratings on T5's

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1WildII
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2003
1

1WildII

Member
Oct 6, 2003
199
0
16
Anacortes, Wa
Dec 9, 2003
#1
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #1
Anyone know the torq ratings on the 79-94 mustang T5's, were the same T5's in the 302's as well as the V6 & 2.3's? I got a mildly built 302 and I need am hoping someone knows what kindof torque the T5's can handle. Thanks in advance for the help.

Chris
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 9, 2003
#2
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #2
Depending on the year....any T-5 older than '86 isn't worth the trouble, since they were "Non World Class". Beyond that....They were rated between 265lbs/ft - 300lbs/ft depending on the year...but they all break just the same….third friggin gear!

As for the V-6's, I believe they're all rated at 265lbs/ft.

The 2.3's on the other hand....well, lets just say that the only thing they had in common with the V-8's were the cases. EVERYTHING else is different. Take a pass if you're offered one.
 

moonenn3186

Founding Member
Jan 9, 2002
233
0
0
Dubuque, Iowa
Dec 9, 2003
#3
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #3
Listen to Gearbanger - but don't get caught up in Tq ratings. The 85 GT 4v put out more tq at the rear wheels than the trans was rated at.

It all depends on how you drive the car. I have had an 85 T-5 live very happy behind a 365 FWTQ car and it is about to be bolted to my 410 RWTQ car...if you are launching on slicks - go Tremec TKO - if you are driving on the street - your T-5 will live long with the right shifter.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 9, 2003
#4
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #4
Oh yeah, don't get me wrong. The '85 T-5 was rated at the same 265lbs/ft as the later units, I was just referring to their less smooth shifting ability because of their use of non tapered roller bearing design with regards to the countershaft, synchroniser durability, cost to rebuild, etc. That's why I and many others don't regard them as high as the later "World Class" units. As moonenn3186 stated, torque rating doesn’t tell the whole story..…add a little traction and you’ll scatter pretty much any T-5 across the pavement. It’s all going to depend on driving style and how you use (abuse) it.
 

1993SSP

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2001
1,194
0
37
Ky
Dec 9, 2003
#5
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #5
I got a question, I have an V8 tranny but the id tag is missing, has been rebuilt and wasnt put back on. Is there a way of telling if it's a non world class or not by looking at the casing numbers??

thanks
 

YardSpecial

New Member
Mar 20, 2003
2,664
0
0
MT
Dec 9, 2003
#6
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #6
Read this:

http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/t5_history.htm
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 9, 2003
#7
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #7
I stand corrected....the '84 and earlier boxes were the non "World Class" variety, not the '85's
 
8

86Five-0

Member
May 6, 2003
806
0
16
New Jersey
Dec 9, 2003
#8
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #8
Nobody mentioned that the T-5 didn't come into the picture till mid-83 I believe. 79-82/83 Mustangs came with the SROD 4 speed which was a whole different story. I believe the highest rated T-5's didn't come out till 89/90, they were rated at 300lbs-ft of torque, before that I believe it was 285(86?-88).
 

Ranchero5.0

The Voice of Reason
Jan 1, 1999
5,306
0
76
Hagerstown MD
Dec 9, 2003
#9
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #9
Yeah, you have to aware that the dang things are fragile. Mine is about to go. I can feel the gears seperating in third and fourth on the '93. But then it's 400 RWHP so I can live with it for now. Personally I wouldn't even bother rebuilding one anymore for a serious car that you plan on keeping. Just pony up for a 3550 or TKO if you can or suffer the consequences.

I've also blown the snap ring off fifth gear in the Capri at around 5k in fifth going way over 130mph with 3.55 gearson the interstate. Very scary, sounded like a gun went off and the car coasted for three miles before it slowed down enough to put it in fourth and drive the rest of the way to work.

Jamie
 
2

2001droptizzy

New Member
Sep 2, 2003
99
0
0
Humboldt
Dec 9, 2003
#10
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #10
Didnt the torqe rating go up to 300lbs in 91?Thats what i was told when i got mine???
 

YardSpecial

New Member
Mar 20, 2003
2,664
0
0
MT
Dec 9, 2003
#11
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #11
Instead of guessing, do some research !!

Here is the Torque ratings chart:

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/349.shtml
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
286
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
592
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
800
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
1979 Pace Car Build- #887
  • darryl27529
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
Willybill32
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?