I've read all the recommendations about getting the TPS set as close to .99 as you can without going over, and it makes sense except for one thing: my personal experience (after four 5.0 cars) has been that it is really a matter of trial and error to get a good result that works for your car. I am currently running .54v, after trying to make .98v work forever. But I just kept getting a soft idle that would not snap back in place, and wanted to hunt up and down. I did it all, including using a Ford idle air bypass plate, which allows you to set a static idle screw and TPS setting and then tweak the actual idle speed by air bleeds, but ultimately zeroed in on a compeletely different number that gave me a snappy idle without hunting. It took some doing, but I did get a good steady idle that does not hunt by tweaking it to .54v (although the IAC and bypass plate must be kept clean). But I always had bad result just blindly setting .97-.98v. Frankly, it can't be as simple as just hitting .98, since as I recall the the EECIV F.I. bible by Charles Probst, which should be on every 5.0 owner's shelf, doesn't even mention trying to hit numbers around .98. I think it just says that as long as you are under 1.0v at idle you are OK. And in the nearly 20 years since the 5.0 H.O. motor hit the streets, I don't ever remember seeing an article that actually gave some real-life dyno numbers to prove a difference between .54v and .98v. All they could ever say was that it must be better because the computer knows that it is off-idle more instantaneously. Am I wrong? .54v works better for me on GT40 iron heads; E303; MSD6A; Mac Shorties; BBK H-Pipe; Centerforce Dual Friction; Flowmaster 2-chambers. What's your story on this, I'd be interested to hear?