• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

TPS voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter GTJake
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2006

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
May 5, 2006
#1
  • May 5, 2006
  • #1
I have a fox body TPS/throttle body. I'm getting .80 V on my tweecer and .77 using a voltmeter. Is this a sign of a bad TPS or bad wires going to the TPS?

I know you can adjust them on Fox cars, but the sn-95 computer automatically adjusts the voltage to the .98 range no matter which way you put the sensor in.

Also, could this be the culprit of my horrible gas mileage?


Jake
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 5, 2006
#2
  • May 5, 2006
  • #2
Both the A9 series and 5N95 computers will zero out the baseline TPS reading.

That said, some folks say they notice a difference if playing with the setting.

As for the 3 mA difference between the meter and TwEECer, that aint worth thinkin about. If you take two meters, chances are one will read slightly different than another - even with very high end stuff.

Good luck.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
May 5, 2006
#3
  • May 5, 2006
  • #3
In the EEC Analyzer software it said that it was normal to have a slightly different reading from the wires to the EEC. I would say .80 to .77 is pretty slight. I have mine around .90 works fine.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 5, 2006
#4
  • May 5, 2006
  • #4
Don't think that has anything to do with gas milage Jake

Still say its cause you got a big, fat, heavy ... Right Foot

I also don't think you have anything to worry about with that value as the pcm understands .80 is closed when you first fire it up.

If you wanna get it a bit higher then by all means do so

I'd go no higher than .95

Grady
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
May 5, 2006
#5
  • May 5, 2006
  • #5
I scanned codes and it said my TPS voltage was too low. Code 122, I think. I put a new TPS in there and it went right to .94. Hopefully it is affecting my mileage, cuz I used to get awesome mileage on trips (~27mpg).

Jake
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
May 5, 2006
#6
  • May 5, 2006
  • #6
http://www.50tech.com/viewtopic.php?t=50395&sid=070f78920b49e37db61d67bf3f888288

Is some good tips on what you need to do
 

Mustangless

Member
Jun 27, 2003
903
1
18
home
May 5, 2006
#7
  • May 5, 2006
  • #7
GTJake said:
I scanned codes and it said my TPS voltage was too low. Code 122, I think. I put a new TPS in there and it went right to .94. Hopefully it is affecting my mileage, cuz I used to get awesome mileage on trips (~27mpg).

Jake
Click to expand...

I too have sucky gas mileage. My tps with was around .95 I think with tweecer datalogging. It was lower, not low enough to get a code. I adjusted it but it did not fix my mpg. I finally found a leak on my egr (blocked it off). I have not driven enough to check my mpg, but I hope its better. My city is low (14-15) but my highway is (23-26)


what is your mpg?
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
May 5, 2006
#8
  • May 5, 2006
  • #8
My last tank was 17.9 with mixed highway and city, so not as bad as I thought it was going to be. But I think I may have to commute 35 miles each way this summer with it, so I'd like to get it back to where it used to be.

Jake
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 5, 2006
#9
  • May 5, 2006
  • #9
18 MPG with your numbers isnt much to sneeze at around town, IMHO.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
May 6, 2006
#10
  • May 6, 2006
  • #10
GTJake said:
My last tank was 17.9 with mixed highway and city, so not as bad as I thought it was going to be. But I think I may have to commute 35 miles each way this summer with it, so I'd like to get it back to where it used to be.

Jake
Click to expand...
I am usually at around 17.5-18.0 mpg. Combined of course.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
May 6, 2006
#11
  • May 6, 2006
  • #11
Yeah, I think I used to be in the low 20s for combined mileage. But I just fixed some sizeable exhaust leaks, so I'm hoping that helps my mileage.

Jake
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
801
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
653
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
643
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Resolved AOD Early Shift at low RPM Stock 91 5.0
  • Yyhoop
  • Nov 10, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2023
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?