• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Traction

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1969mach1351
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2005
1

1969mach1351

Member
Apr 18, 2003
285
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Jun 20, 2005
#1
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #1
I have homemade caltracs with 255/65/15 tires. I have removed a leaf from the leaf springs, as suggested by stangnet members. I still do not notice any difference in 60ft times with the caltracs. I actually could not even reach a 2.0 with them as I could without them. I have some pretty new Dunlop GT Qualifiers that have a tread rating of 440. I know this is not ideal for racing but I would have expected something from the caltracs since everyone who has caltracs says they are great. I borrowed my brothers wheels which are in ok shape, 245/40/18s with a tread wear of 300 and I could not beleive how much better they stuck to the ground. My tires spin if I launch at 1500 and then again once I reach 5000 rpm. My brothers tires I could launch at 2000 and did not spin on the top end. Do my caltracs not work cause my tires just suck?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jun 20, 2005
#2
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #2
I remember you posting a pic of your homemade cal-tracs a while back. I noticed one thing that might make them work significantly different than the real deal. If I remember correctly, your adjustment points were on the spring plate, rather than the bracket that bolts to the spring eye. If thats the case, you need to tune them opposite the way people adjust the real cal-tracs. For instance, I have my real cal-tracs set with just a touch of preload, and the bar goes thru the bottom hole on the front bracket. Now, this might be the same as you having your bar going thru the top hole on your spring plate bracket, depending on whatever geometry your setup has. It helps if you can imagine the instant center location. Lets say the instant center is an imaginary point in the middle of the door. Follow the line of your cal-tracs and see if it would lead to this imaginary point. I think you just need to try the different adjustments and see how the car reacts.

I think that what makes Cal-Tracs work better than a typical traction bar is the geometry. They are custom made for the application. If you take away that geometry, they're no better than a $30 set of Lakewood slapper bars. The geometry of the Cal-Tracs has a definite effect on the way the tire is planted and the way in which weight is transfered.

Good luck!
 
1

1969mach1351

Member
Apr 18, 2003
285
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Jun 20, 2005
#3
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #3
That was another modification I made recently. I now have adjustments in the front. I tried the bars in all positions except in both top holes.
 
Y

Yellwstang21

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
30
0
0
Jun 20, 2005
#4
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #4
Why would you remove a leaf spring? I havent heard this =/
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jun 21, 2005
#5
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #5
I can cut 2.0 60' times on Dunlop GT Qualifiers 255 60 R15s with a real set of Cal-Tracs. I suspect you need to play with the adjustment a little more.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 21, 2005
#6
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #6
You remove the spring pad to make the springs softer. You really don't want that with a stock spring though. You don't want the rear to squat. I would move the backs up, it may help buy moving the IC forward. Only problem is you are trying to hook with street tires. No matter how well the bar are working, if you aren't transfering weight, it just won't help much. I run the ones I made and they work well, but have the whole package. I just don't see caltracs being anything more than expensive anti-wheelhop bars without slicks, or something else to help. Don't get me wrong, I love mine. But they are made to plant the tires. But you are trying to get hard rubber to grab, with alittle amount of force. I think even DR would show you a world of difference. Maybe not a dead hook, but a better 60ft for sure.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jun 21, 2005
#7
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #7
......STICKY tires, put a set of et streetsd on there and i bet ya cut a 1.6
 
1

1969mach1351

Member
Apr 18, 2003
285
0
16
Sacramento, CA
Jun 21, 2005
#8
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #8
The springs that are in the car aren't stock, they are 5 leafs. I am looking into some ET streets but the thing is I can't do a burnout without wheelhop still. It is much better with the bars but still very violent when it happens. If I mash it from a stand still it wont wheelhop much but if I try and brake stand it then it wheelhops a lot. Maybe my pinion angle is wrong?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 21, 2005
#9
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #9
what shocks are you using? You may try switching to rancho2000 shocks if your budget allows?

Your tires should not be losing traction at 5000rpm...unless there is some kind of spike in your power band or torque curve.
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Jun 21, 2005
#10
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #10
i battle with wheelhop too, and i have the same situation where i mash it and it doesnt hop but then i spin through the 60' marker without and cut like a 2.3 time....but my trap is 106...so i ran with a pair of slicks that my friend let me borrow and you wouldnt beleive the time difference, so if ur setup is similar to mine, tires are the way to go
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Meet Snow Beast
  • fun331
  • Mar 2, 2023
  • 2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2007 - 2014 Shelby GT500 Tech Nov 12, 2024
fun331
Tire Fitment, With Pictures. Post your 10.5 wheel/tire combos
  • 89GTRound2
  • Mar 17, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 15, 2024
ThinBlue502
M
2.3 Turbo T5 Trouble
  • morpheus256
  • Oct 14, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 17, 2021
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?