• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Tri-ax vs. Pro 5.0 vs. MGW on a T5

  • Thread starter Thread starter No.11
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 28, 2010
#21
  • Dec 28, 2010
  • #21
I had one of the older red handle shifters. Now I think they just sell orange handle and silver handle. But previously they sold a red handle and a blue handle.

If youncheck eBay you can find these handles. More options to shift position.
 

No.11

10 Year Member
Oct 13, 2009
614
10
48
Los Angeles
Dec 28, 2010
#22
  • Dec 28, 2010
  • #22
Mustang5L5 said:
I had one of the older red handle shifters. Now I think they just sell orange handle and silver handle. But previously they sold a red handle and a blue handle.

If youncheck eBay you can find these handles. More options to shift position.
Click to expand...

how were the red and blue ones? shorter? longer?
 

TwoToneHatch

Active Member
Mar 22, 2007
170
2
28
New Jersey
Dec 28, 2010
#23
  • Dec 28, 2010
  • #23
I have driven a car with all 3 shifters . Personally i have a Tri-Ax on my T5 and it's really nice. The throws aren't as short as the pro 5.0 but still are short enough and it feels really good . My father's car has a Pro 5.0 and the throws are really short and percise , and it feels stout . Whether it's better than the steeda or vice-versa seems to come down to how short you like the throws .

My friends car has an MGW and it feels nice but not substantially better than the Tri-Ax or Pro 5.0 although I like the how you can swing the handle around and put it exactly where you. All three so you can't go wrong overall I like the Pro 5.0 the best (but only slightly) over the Tri-Ax and then the MGW.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Dec 28, 2010
#24
  • Dec 28, 2010
  • #24
90lxcoupe said:
i have a pro 5.0 with a tri ax handle and a stock shift knob, no complaints here. I think any of those choices will make you happy tho
Click to expand...

Thats to combo I have and I like it, the only reason I went to the Tri-ax handle is to reach the shifter better. You can't go wrong with any of these in my opinion
 

ReefBlueHatch

Active Member
Jan 12, 2010
682
96
39
Central KY
Dec 28, 2010
#25
  • Dec 28, 2010
  • #25
My car already had a B&M shifter (not the Ripper, but the blue one) installed and I don't like it. It's noisy, vibrates and had a lot of slop - so I've been thinking about getting an MGW.
 
1

1990_GT

New Member
Jun 29, 2009
41
0
0
Marysville Wa.
Dec 29, 2010
#26
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #26
I had a pro 5.0 in my car, didnt really like the feel of it. So I bought a MGW, smooth shifts very crisp feeling going through the gears. I also run the 03-04 cobra style knob and love it too.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 29, 2010
#27
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #27
im running a pro 5.0 with a hurst pistol grip handle... and i can power shift till 4th with out issue. works good enough for me
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Dec 29, 2010
#28
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #28
Basically any shifter is better than stock.....even the $30 ebay shifter.
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Dec 29, 2010
#29
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #29
I have had a Tri-ax, liked it. But put a MGW in my 88 and I love it. Had the silver handle but it was too short. The orange handle is alot better to me.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Dec 29, 2010
#30
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #30
Mustang5L5 said:
Basically any shifter is better than stock.....even the $30 ebay shifter.
Click to expand...

:Word:
 

Mintsick

10 Year Member
Jan 6, 2007
589
39
68
West Lafayette, IN
Dec 29, 2010
#31
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • #31
Another satisfied MGW owner here, really quality piece highly recommended.
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Dec 30, 2010
#32
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #32
steeda ftw! ive had it in both of my cars and love it. there will be one in my next mustang as well...
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Dec 30, 2010
#33
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • #33
If you're tall, nothing beats the Steeda Comfort Pro handle. It puts the handle way higher, way further to the left, and way further back than anything I've ever seen, including the MGW. Short handle doesn't mean **** if you have to lean out of the seat to hit 3rd
 

Metalcop

Active Member
Jun 6, 2004
148
1
28
New Hampshire
Dec 31, 2010
#34
  • Dec 31, 2010
  • #34
I have the Pro 5.0 and it is a decent piece, very well made. However, I can still miss third, which all aftermarket shifters brag that they fix this common problem. I think that a lot of people are loyal to the Pro 5.0, because they were 'the first'. Meaning that they took the design of a short shifter (probably Hurst) and overbuilt the hell out of it, using a thick billet aluminum base plate, instead of the industry standard stamped steel pieces. Possible the reason that MGW got the bad press is because they don't use re-sellers, so none of these companies can make any money off of them, so why should they recommend them? I have heard nothing but good things about about them, and if I was in the market for one, i would buy the MGW. But I'm not really looking to replace my Pro 5.0, since it does a great job, and I already spent close to $200 for it!!
 

No.11

10 Year Member
Oct 13, 2009
614
10
48
Los Angeles
Jan 1, 2011
#35
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #35
ok I'm getting the mgw for sure. too bad they're on vacation and won't be processing orders until the 3rd. gotta wait to order.

metalcop I liked your post. very true, mgw is the only design that's different.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 1, 2011
#36
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #36
I'll agree that any aftermarket shifter is better than the stock junk, but this is an area where I think that some are just plain better than others. I've had to modify my BBK unit a few times before I felt like I could speed shift consistently, and in the end I really should have bought a Pro-5.0 or MGW in the first place.

MFE92 said:
Short handle doesn't mean **** if you have to lean out of the seat to hit 3rd
Click to expand...

+one bajillion. My BBK unit was awful about that, so I ended up fabricating a bracket that moved the handle back about 1"-1.5". I kept missing third because my arm was completely straightened out before it engaged the gear, so I had to lean into it a little, and that just wasn't consistent when speed shifting.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 1, 2011
#37
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #37
When I bought my car back in 1988 the only aftermarket shifter available was the cast Hurst unit, and I picked up the Thunderbird unit for the longer shift lever. Fast forward to about 5 years ago and the car came out of long-term hibernation and needed an update. I searched the forums and ended up with a Pro 5.0 but with their stock lever I didn't have enough effort to make accurate shifts so I bought an MGW adjustable lever and tailored the shifter to me and not the other way around. Check out this $30 piece:



Linkey: Mustang Shift Handle

ALSO, my Pro-5.0 shifter hits the console cover and when the tranny moves as I go over bumps and things the plastic squeeks. I'm not sure if this movement is the result of bad transmission mount bushings or whatever, but I didn't have a problem when I had the smaller profile Hurst unit.
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jan 1, 2011
#38
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #38
I have owned both the Pro-5.0 and the Tri-Ax and hands down the Pro-5.0 is better. I did drive an 03 GT with the 3650 and an MGW shifter for a short distance and it was nice too. I ran my Pro-5.0 with the short handle for awhile in my 91 LX but when I got one for my 97 Cobra T45 I used the Pro-5.0 base with the stock handle which I think is a great combo.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Jan 1, 2011
#39
  • Jan 1, 2011
  • #39
I am actually running the steed tri-ax with the comfort pro handle. I didn't like it, so i bought the standard tri ax handle instead. I'm 6'1"

Still gonna buy an MGW one of these days though
 
V

VanD

Member
Oct 13, 2010
80
0
6
Bay Area Nor Cal
Jan 3, 2011
#40
  • Jan 3, 2011
  • #40
MGW shifter is in my future asap. i hate the stock shift to 3rd.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
625
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Need a clutch, 1982 Capri RS 5.0 owner, am I allowed to participate?
  • scudzuki
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
350
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?