• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

TrickFlow vs AFR's

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95_cobra123
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2007

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#1
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #1
Can you guys tell me how much better the AFR's Would have been i stold these TF's for just under $800 still in box never been out of it.

Trick Flow Twisted Wedge

* Assembled heads with valves, springs, locks, guideplates, and 3/8" rocker studs
* 61cc combustion chamber design makes more power
* 2.02" intake/1.60" exhaust valves for low and top end power
* Capable of supporting .540" lift cams without flycut pistons
* Factory accessories mount in stock locations
* Accepts most OEM and aftermarket intakes, OEM exhaust manifolds, and major brand headers
* Made in the U.S.A.
* Mint in Box


vs


AFR's

AFR# 1402 - 165cc Street Heads, Stud, 58cc
AFR# 1400 - 165cc Street Heads, Stud, 61cc

that about all the info i have on afr's i would have gone with the 165's not the 185's

probably a simple "?" but still need to ask cause i could probly turn around and sell the heads and get afrs.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 10, 2007
#2
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #2
Good power can and has been made with both

Both offer good and bad points

I like the smaller chambers of the AFR's for a NA combo.

You can run ped rockers with AFR where as you can't with TFS.
This would allow you to move over your existing OEM rockers for
some savings.

Still ... I ran stud mounts on my AFR's as I prefer them over peds.

The TFS heads offer a larger valve which could be an advantage in
some applications.

6 one way ... 1/2 a dozen the other

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 10, 2007
#3
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #3
I am pretty sure those TFS heads are 170cc runners. Why they don't ever say that

So...AFR would need a ARF 170cc to equate in that respect...
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Apr 10, 2007
#4
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #4
Keep the heads you have and go with it. For the difference in what you would pay for a new set of AFRs you could do some work to the TWs and make more power.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Apr 10, 2007
#5
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #5
After seeing first hand what TFS TW heads can do (worked), and what members here have posted as results I would feel confident going with TFS heads. If I was to go alum. I would look at TFS.

AFR's are not bad at all either

sounds like a GOOD problem to have in the first place
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Apr 10, 2007
#6
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #6
For the price difference, especially at what you got the TW for, keep the Trick flows.
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Apr 10, 2007
#7
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #7
I went ahead and got AFR 185's
 

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#8
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #8
Thanks guys.

Yea now i just have to figure out what Rockers to get for it.... and witch Anderson cam. I like the N41 but i am wondering if i can go any bigger???
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Apr 10, 2007
#9
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #9
Stock pistons?
 

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#10
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #10
Yes Sir.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Apr 11, 2007
#11
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #11
Keep the TFS heads (it looks like you decided to anyway). I chose them over the AFR 165 heads for a couple of reasons, personally. First, I liked the canted valves, so I could run a 2.02 in. intake valve with stock pistons. Try that with a set of AFR 185's, and you're having to flycut. Second, Total Engine Airflow gets some pretty good numbers out of them with their CNC work, so down the road when I end up doing a larger displacement engine, I don't need to buy another set of heads, I can merely give TEA a call and ship off my heads for some work. You could do the same with a set of AFR heads, but the initial investment was lower by going with the TFS heads, too. I paid somewhere around $1200 from Summit, but couldn't find a set of AFR 165 heads for under $1400, at the places that actually had them in stock. Seemed like a pretty logical decision to make, but that's just my opinion.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 11, 2007
#12
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #12
Redsnk95 said:
Keep the heads you have and go with it. For the difference in what you would pay for a new set of AFRs you could do some work to the TWs and make more power.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Looking for ECU/CHIP for 1992 5.0
  • Nathan26
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
306
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 8, 2026
Qtrhrse23
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
524
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?