• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

TrickFlow vs AFR's

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95_cobra123
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2007

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#1
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #1
Can you guys tell me how much better the AFR's Would have been i stold these TF's for just under $800 still in box never been out of it.

Trick Flow Twisted Wedge

* Assembled heads with valves, springs, locks, guideplates, and 3/8" rocker studs
* 61cc combustion chamber design makes more power
* 2.02" intake/1.60" exhaust valves for low and top end power
* Capable of supporting .540" lift cams without flycut pistons
* Factory accessories mount in stock locations
* Accepts most OEM and aftermarket intakes, OEM exhaust manifolds, and major brand headers
* Made in the U.S.A.
* Mint in Box


vs


AFR's

AFR# 1402 - 165cc Street Heads, Stud, 58cc
AFR# 1400 - 165cc Street Heads, Stud, 61cc

that about all the info i have on afr's i would have gone with the 165's not the 185's

probably a simple "?" but still need to ask cause i could probly turn around and sell the heads and get afrs.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 10, 2007
#2
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #2
Good power can and has been made with both

Both offer good and bad points

I like the smaller chambers of the AFR's for a NA combo.

You can run ped rockers with AFR where as you can't with TFS.
This would allow you to move over your existing OEM rockers for
some savings.

Still ... I ran stud mounts on my AFR's as I prefer them over peds.

The TFS heads offer a larger valve which could be an advantage in
some applications.

6 one way ... 1/2 a dozen the other

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 10, 2007
#3
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #3
I am pretty sure those TFS heads are 170cc runners. Why they don't ever say that

So...AFR would need a ARF 170cc to equate in that respect...
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Apr 10, 2007
#4
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #4
Keep the heads you have and go with it. For the difference in what you would pay for a new set of AFRs you could do some work to the TWs and make more power.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Apr 10, 2007
#5
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #5
After seeing first hand what TFS TW heads can do (worked), and what members here have posted as results I would feel confident going with TFS heads. If I was to go alum. I would look at TFS.

AFR's are not bad at all either

sounds like a GOOD problem to have in the first place
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Apr 10, 2007
#6
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #6
For the price difference, especially at what you got the TW for, keep the Trick flows.
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Apr 10, 2007
#7
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #7
I went ahead and got AFR 185's
 

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#8
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #8
Thanks guys.

Yea now i just have to figure out what Rockers to get for it.... and witch Anderson cam. I like the N41 but i am wondering if i can go any bigger???
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Apr 10, 2007
#9
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #9
Stock pistons?
 

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Apr 10, 2007
#10
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #10
Yes Sir.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Apr 11, 2007
#11
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #11
Keep the TFS heads (it looks like you decided to anyway). I chose them over the AFR 165 heads for a couple of reasons, personally. First, I liked the canted valves, so I could run a 2.02 in. intake valve with stock pistons. Try that with a set of AFR 185's, and you're having to flycut. Second, Total Engine Airflow gets some pretty good numbers out of them with their CNC work, so down the road when I end up doing a larger displacement engine, I don't need to buy another set of heads, I can merely give TEA a call and ship off my heads for some work. You could do the same with a set of AFR heads, but the initial investment was lower by going with the TFS heads, too. I paid somewhere around $1200 from Summit, but couldn't find a set of AFR 165 heads for under $1400, at the places that actually had them in stock. Seemed like a pretty logical decision to make, but that's just my opinion.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 11, 2007
#12
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #12
Redsnk95 said:
Keep the heads you have and go with it. For the difference in what you would pay for a new set of AFRs you could do some work to the TWs and make more power.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
945
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
450
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?