• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Tuners. E7's + Forced Induction 87 Vs 93 Octane

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lxwhite
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2014

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 28, 2014
#1
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #1
Have y'all noticed much of a difference between tuning with 87 or 89 octane vs 93 with e7 heads and a centri blower w 6-8 lbs of boost? I'm also running a .512 lift cam if that's something to take into consideration.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Aug 28, 2014
#2
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #2
?? What's your question?? Can you make more power with better gas/timing? Please don't take offense just curious.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 28, 2014
#3
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #3
A5literMan said:
?? What's your question?? Can you make more power with better gas/timing? Please don't take offense just curious.
Click to expand...
Yeah do y'all think my mild lil motor would benefit from enough timing to where I'd need to run 93? I'm only tuning it for one fuel.
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 28, 2014
#4
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #4
Here's an article I read that got me thinking. The 2 previous times it was tuned w 93 but I don't know if it was really necessary. http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/fuel_octane_rating_comparison/
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Aug 28, 2014
#5
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #5
Interesting read. All I know about in my expierience has been my cars always ran better with 93 oct and about 14-15* adv timing (n/a) or 10* with nitrous. I used to 50/50 mix 93/100 and bumped timing to 12* and a 150 shot(ran the best times ever with this). With your iron heads detonation is more likely than with alum heads. I don't know what your timing is/should be but I'd be reading the plugs routinely. As a rule of thumb I'd run the 93 as a safety factor even if it doesn't "make more power".
 
Reactions: 90lxwhite

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 28, 2014
#6
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #6
Risking cheap gas in a supercharged fox would be insane (IMO).
It's risk reward, cheap gas will save you a couple hundred bucks a year max, but a blown head gasket could cost thousands.
There is no fancy electronics on a fox to protect you from blowing it up like new cars have.

I bet if you went and put some 87 in it right now, put your foot to floor, it would ping (assuming the car isn't so loud you can't hear it).
 
Reactions: 90lxwhite

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Aug 28, 2014
#7
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • #7
Yeah I'm with y'all about the 93 for safety thing vs money saved, especially as little as its driven. Reading that article got the gears in my head turning kinda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
12K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
RANT!!! As A Blanket Statement.....all "forged" Pistons Are Not Created Equal
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Nov 13, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2016
mikestang63
Exhaust Size W Forced Induction?
  • 90lxwhite
  • Jun 22, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 28, 2014
bentley429isBAC
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?