• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Turbo Lag

  • Thread starter Thread starter SVOconvLX85
  • Start date Start date Apr 16, 2004
S

SVOconvLX85

Member
Mar 16, 2004
251
0
16
Vegas, for a while...
Apr 16, 2004
#1
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #1
I had recently asked for some info on getting a volvo fmic, and I received the replies that I was looking for but another thing that I was thinking about was turbo lag. Now if my SVO is stock and all I do is put the fmic on, how much longer will it take to boost up? Will I be able to notice the extra power with just the intercooler upgrade?
thanks
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Apr 16, 2004
#2
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #2
Should be no noticeable time lag from front mnt but extra power will only come from higher boost.
 
S

SVOconvLX85

Member
Mar 16, 2004
251
0
16
Vegas, for a while...
Apr 16, 2004
#3
  • Apr 16, 2004
  • #3
I guess I never understood the concept of the turbo air and the potential turbo lag but if it starts to boost around 2250 rpm, it should stay about the same? As of right now it's kind of a gradual boost up and I don't want it to just go and then all of a sudden boost up and me have to shift while it's just boosting up. I dont know...
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Apr 17, 2004
#4
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #4
Running stock boost on a unmodified-lightly modified motor, you wont see a differnce in lag time. Many guys over on turboford.org run truck size intercoolers without any complaints of lag issues.
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Apr 17, 2004
#5
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #5
Turbo lag would come from the exhaust side.
Upgrade to a header or ported manifold and larger free flowing exhaust to help with that.
Only other thing you will notice with extra intake piping is what is called trailer hitching when on and off the throttle.
This is where the bypass valves come in to play,
keeping the air circulating and not slamming back into compressor blades.
Some people choose and modify blowoff valves to work with the metered air system. This would be another topic.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#6
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #6
G-90 said:
Should be no noticeable time lag from front mnt but extra power will only come from higher boost.
Click to expand...

He may get something from it since you gain 1% hp for every 10 degrees cooler the air gets.
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Apr 17, 2004
#7
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #7
Well my car does love the cool weather.

On another note; I lost my IC for a while when I put Rods header on, and noticed more power at 15psi no IC than when I had 18psi cooled.
So flow still has a lot to do with the equation as well.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Apr 17, 2004
#8
  • Apr 17, 2004
  • #8
I wouldn't know I'm still stick with the ole stock SVO IC
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Apr 18, 2004
#9
  • Apr 18, 2004
  • #9
There are no issues with slowing the boost response (not spool). It's been calculated out to be somewhere around .0014 seconds difference. If you can feel that I'll give you a cookie.

Maybe a slight increase in power, should run closer to how it runs in cool weather...the real power comes from the ability to up the boost because of the cooler air though.
 
S

SVOconvLX85

Member
Mar 16, 2004
251
0
16
Vegas, for a while...
Apr 19, 2004
#10
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #10
G-90 mentioned something about "trailer hitching." Isn't that what that little boost solenoid cylinder looking thing with the two wires coming off of it is for? So could I use that front mount IC with the stock components and crank up the boost a little more with cooler air? Also, would I most likely have to make a header for my car?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Apr 19, 2004
#11
  • Apr 19, 2004
  • #11
No, that has nothing to do with trailer hitching...that's your boost control solenoid.

You can pick up a header if you want...you don't "have" to by any means. I sell a pretty mean one.

Stinger
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
875
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
291
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
604
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:59 AM
spilly
S
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
245
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
T
2010 4.6 3v Violently engages VVT please help
  • Travis.bellew
  • Jan 16, 2024
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jan 17, 2024
Dino Dino Bambino
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?