- Sep 4, 2004
- 315
- 0
- 16
i dont kno if this is more of a tech or talk subject, so feel free to move it, and i appologize for bugging you guys about this common question, but what would be better: turbo or supercharger(of any kind)
i have an 02 gt, and with the basic bolt ons, but i am saving up for forced induction, and i am torn between turbo or supercharger. i have recently built 3 hondas with turbos on them and seen awesome gains. normally between 200 and 250% hp gains. that to me is very impressive. ive researched some supercharger sites and saw that they only advertise up to about 75% hp gains. and ive seen some sig's that show 400+ rwhp on stangs with superchargers. the hondas me and my bro built were pushing 450whp as well. so i am wondering what kind of gains turboed stangs are making, and what it would take to achieve that. i kno alot of people talk about the parasthetic loss from a supercharger, but with the new superchargers, it is very minimal, and with the newer turbos, the lag has also been minimized. i also kno that the hondas are able to make such great gains because they can rev about 2500k more than a stang, so another question would be: how could i make my stang rev higher and be safe with it. sorry for the length, but i need both side before i spend $4000 on my car.
thanks for the help guys :SNSign: rules!!
i have an 02 gt, and with the basic bolt ons, but i am saving up for forced induction, and i am torn between turbo or supercharger. i have recently built 3 hondas with turbos on them and seen awesome gains. normally between 200 and 250% hp gains. that to me is very impressive. ive researched some supercharger sites and saw that they only advertise up to about 75% hp gains. and ive seen some sig's that show 400+ rwhp on stangs with superchargers. the hondas me and my bro built were pushing 450whp as well. so i am wondering what kind of gains turboed stangs are making, and what it would take to achieve that. i kno alot of people talk about the parasthetic loss from a supercharger, but with the new superchargers, it is very minimal, and with the newer turbos, the lag has also been minimized. i also kno that the hondas are able to make such great gains because they can rev about 2500k more than a stang, so another question would be: how could i make my stang rev higher and be safe with it. sorry for the length, but i need both side before i spend $4000 on my car.
thanks for the help guys :SNSign: rules!!
It's hella rad. He has a s/c on his, not sure what brand though. He did, however, get HIDs and then buy some projected headlines. Again, a very sweet addition to any Mustang.
. If you are going to go the KB 2.2 route i hope you have a lot of cash. There are many many more things that need to be upgraded before that baby will run on a GT. Fuel tank, dual pumps, hood, etc.. A 1.7 will do just fine for what you want. I have a 1.7 and a forged shortblock waiting for install and a friend has a KB 1.7 and we cruise often. the 1.7 is still stupid fast if you get the 9# intercooled kit. I had the option of going turbo but decided on KB instead. From my friends ride compared to the turbo cars I've been in I'm not dissappointed with my choice. The KB feels like you got kicked in the tailbone when it hooks. I was sore the next day after the last time we went cruising in the KB. That's how violent the launches are when you hook a KB. Turbo, na. My .02.