• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Turbo Upgrade

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01PonyGT
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2004

01PonyGT

Member
Jul 27, 2003
304
0
16
Willow Grove, PA
Jun 1, 2004
#1
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #1
Ok, I'm just fantasizing here, so bear with me. I have a complete 2.3T motor and IHI Turbo from an 88 TurboCoupe on an engine stand in the garage. I am probably going to rebuild it to "slightly better" than stock specs before putting it in the Mustang. So here's my question: What would a reliable and proven upgrade to the IHI turbo be? I know it is a T3 from the earlier TurboCoupes/SVOs, but what about about a T3/T4 hybrid? Also what trim would you suggest? Realistically, I'm looking to get about 275-300 RWHP from this running about 20psi. I already have a gillis boost valve waiting for when the engine goes in. Any suggetsions? I have to admit that I'm completely lost when looking at the .57, .60, .63 a/r, etc.

Thanks,
WES
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jun 6, 2004
#2
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #2
.60/.63 T3 turbo will support that much power. Don't bother with a hybrid.
 

Dan P.

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
483
0
27
N.C.
Jun 6, 2004
#3
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #3
Stinger said:
.60/.63 T3 turbo will support that much power. Don't bother with a hybrid.
Click to expand...

Why is that ?
 

01PonyGT

Member
Jul 27, 2003
304
0
16
Willow Grove, PA
Jun 6, 2004
#4
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #4
Stinger said:
.60/.63 T3 turbo will support that much power. Don't bother with a hybrid.
Click to expand...

I recently picked up a new Turbonetics 60 Trim with a .48 A/R (stage 1) for a decent price. I'll be replacing the IHI with it when the engine goes in.

WES
 

Jugador

New Member
Aug 30, 2003
70
0
0
Jun 6, 2004
#5
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #5
Dan P. said:
Why is that ?
Click to expand...

because a T3 can easily handle that much boost
 
E

Evil86lx

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
58
0
0
dever colo
Jun 6, 2004
#6
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #6
Dan P. said:
Why is that ?
Click to expand...

Like said earlier the T3 will support that much boost and would leave you some money for other stuff. Start simple and get it running and tuned/bugs worked out and then think about bigger turbo's.

kyle
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Jun 7, 2004
#7
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #7
sure a T3 will make that much boost, and that means nothing, the entire point of a T3/T4 hybrid is efficiency, 20psi of boost on a T3 is +130hp, while 20psi on a T3/T4 is 200hp

efficiency.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jun 7, 2004
#8
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #8
JadeFalcon said:
sure a T3 will make that much boost, and that means nothing, the entire point of a T3/T4 hybrid is efficiency, 20psi of boost on a T3 is +130hp, while 20psi on a T3/T4 is 200hp

efficiency.
Click to expand...



Gotta throw the BS flags here. Sure, a hybrid is (generally) more efficient, unfortunately it works both ways though. Putting a hybrid on an engine that doesn't make enough power to use the extra airflow will kill the hybrid's efficiency. There is no way in hell just throwing a hybrid on a midly modded 2.3 will gain 60hp.

I had a basically stock SVO with a T3..swapped on a Hybrid and it didn't get any faster...basically stayed the same speed. Once I threw on some more parts (header, FMIC, ported crap, etc.) it started to get to the point where it could "use" the hybrid.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jun 7, 2004
#9
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #9
Stinger said:


Gotta throw the BS flags here. Sure, a hybrid is (generally) more efficient, unfortunately it works both ways though. Putting a hybrid on an engine that doesn't make enough power to use the extra airflow will kill the hybrid's efficiency. There is no way in hell just throwing a hybrid on a midly modded 2.3 will gain 60hp.

I had a basically stock SVO with a T3..swapped on a Hybrid and it didn't get any faster...basically stayed the same speed. Once I threw on some more parts (header, FMIC, ported crap, etc.) it started to get to the point where it could "use" the hybrid.
Click to expand...

I would have to agree here even though I'm to poor to aford a T3/T4 I would think you would do some porting on the head before you starting on better Turbos
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Jun 7, 2004
#10
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #10
It was an example, I was explaining why the T3/T4 is a better turbo over the T3, I made no mention of motor or application.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jun 8, 2004
#11
  • Jun 8, 2004
  • #11
JadeFalcon said:
I was explaining why the T3/T4 is a better turbo over the T3, I made no mention of motor or application.
Click to expand...

and that is misleading as a blanket statement can't be used for that situation. I was explaining how it works for THESE motors as that is what this forum is for...correct?
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Jun 9, 2004
#12
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #12
on THESE motors? I'm sure you know it takes some modifications to take advantage of a T3/T4 hybrid, sure stinger, if your in the 14's still you may not agree with me. With an attitude like that, I'd rather not deal with you as far as customer support on your headers.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Jun 9, 2004
#13
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #13
Deal as you wish...I didn't know there was attitude in that reply. I was simply trying to explain where "I" was coming from and why "I" wasn't agreeing with your statement.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jun 9, 2004
#14
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #14
Both of you are right, efficiency is the name of the game...but were talking the efficiency of both the motor and the turbo. Utializing flow on both intake and exhuast sides is just as important a proper spec'd turbo. You can see this as evidence on turboford all the time, people throw on t3/t4 hybrid on an engine with little to no serious mods and put down ~215-230rwhp. Which as stinger pointed out, is well within the efficiency range of a stock T3 turbo (even within grasp of an IHI). You are both right...just at two differnt angles of the picture. Jade, stinger is a stand up guy when it comes to Parts, i have yet to hear any negative feedback even after some problems with turbos awhile back. So either he takes care of his customers or he kills the negative ones
 
E

Evil86lx

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
58
0
0
dever colo
Jun 9, 2004
#15
  • Jun 9, 2004
  • #15
JadeFalcon said:
on THESE motors? I'm sure you know it takes some modifications to take advantage of a T3/T4 hybrid, sure stinger, if your in the 14's still you may not agree with me. With an attitude like that, I'd rather not deal with you as far as customer support on your headers.
Click to expand...

I didnt see any attitude here, but hey what do i know .

Throwing a BIG turbo at a stock motor is like throwing a set of AFR 205s on a stock 5.0. Sure they will flow like all hell but nothing else on the motor would flow in the same range.

A good intercooler, some porting and a good tune would be a much larger increase in power than a hybrid. Once the above mods have been done throw the hybrid on and watch out.

Like i said start small and simple and work your way into it. The results will be much more rewarding.

kyle
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
600
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
804
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
610
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
1979 Mustang 2.3 replacement turbo - Garrett?
  • EvgO
  • May 17, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 27, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?