• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

tweecer noob

  • Thread starter Thread starter broken_joke
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Dec 8, 2005
#21
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #21
Can someone tell me what an EEC analyzer is?
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Dec 8, 2005
#22
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #22
Click here: EECanalyzer
All the details are there. Well worth it for me....
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Dec 8, 2005
#23
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #23
the cam i have to replace the tfs stg 1 is a xfi comp cam. the specs on that are 236/248 and 579/579 and 114 lsa if i rember correctly. they are kinda new but i'm gonna try it out maybe after i get a little more tweecing experience. to answer your question if it fits under a stock hood is, no. i really wish it did. i think it'll fit under a cobra r hood 1 1/2 cowl but not entire sure on this. it will depend on intake manifold.
this morning i drove the car about 40 miles and it feels real good. should i be cautious about going full throttle yet?
thanks for all the help!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 8, 2005
#24
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #24
broken_joke said:
made injector pulse width change and idle improved significantly. also have both slopes at 42
Click to expand...

E A has great help files and I would follow them to get started for sure

I have dialed in my 30lb inj's using three different tuning methods and the E A method was the most accurate. We are talking idle and C L here btw.

With every method I used, I got better results with the low slope at 1.1 to 1.2 times the amount of inj size and high slope close to the inj size.

You may find the following interesting reading

The same value for each slope, which the j4j1 is famous for, was due to quick and dirty tuning by a contractor outside of Ford. This is a story I have heard more than once. Slopes of equal value was supposed to take the breakpoint out of the tuning process.

Same slope values just never worked too well for my combo but ...... I do have a narrow lsa which I suspect has been the reason I've had to do several things differently from the main-stream of peeps.

The offsets can make a noticable difference when dialing in your inj's so don't forget to deal with them.

Lately there has been a good bit of talk about those offsets and I have given my findings along with others in detail on the support site.

Your battery voltage drifts WAY more than the average person suspects and that is all about what offsets are for.

You will use your K's to track your progress as you most likely already know.

btw ... I got a tip or two about tuning on my site that may help you

Good to see you're making headway

Grady
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Dec 8, 2005
#25
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • #25
i'll probably try that in a few min going back to the 1.2 X slope and see how it runs.
i will definetly check out your site grady.
again thanks!
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Dec 10, 2005
#26
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #26
i think i am ready to mess with the base spark table. just one question about how i should start tweaking on that. i read the write up by cmant and got some good info from that. looking at my datalog. the advance is maxed out at 40+ degrees the whole time till i am at wot then it is pegged at 26 degrees. i am guessing things need to be somewhat opposite of that. so i imagine this needs attention.when looking at the table on the load side of the graph reads a 2 in the corner then straight down there is .7999 to .049988. which number is the higher load? i am guessing it .7999 but i have been wrong before!

thanks!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 10, 2005
#27
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #27
I understand you want to start tuning to make improvments

but

You will have a better understanding of what is really going on if you put aside tuning changes for a while and get grounded on how things work.

Unless you have a basic understanding of how this stuff works, you'll be dependent on others and that will defeat your whole purpose of getting involved in self tuning.

What I did that helped me a lot was drive around while d logging and see how the load changed during those different driving conditions.

Same kind of deal for spark, fuel, and anything else you want to know about.
Thats whats so great about the Tweecer ......

YOU CAN SEE DATA IN REALTIME!

Use that ability to teach your self.

Hard data don't lie ...... you can trust it!

See where I'm goin here?

It is basiclly a two step process!
1) Research your topic - search faqs & threads
2) Confirm your research by using d logging

To sum it up ..............

How can one possibly make changes to improve a thing if ..........

One does not understand how that thing works in the first place?

Grady
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Dec 10, 2005
#28
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #28
thanks grady
i should have done a little more research when i wrote that. after i wrote that i looked at the tweecer defs spreadsheet and looked at the example for the base table. i inputted that and tweaked a little on that. i took it for a ride and woow! what a difference taking some advance out of the low loads and placing in the higher loads! it smoothed out alot on the low loads and drastically improved the high loads! what you were saying about the seeing real time is kinda what i was doing but was just a little unsure at first.i am learning alot from the forums and threads and it is as valuable a tool as the datalog in my opinion. hey thanks for all the help!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 10, 2005
#29
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #29
broken_joke said:
thanks grady
i should have done a little more research when i wrote that. after i wrote that i looked at the tweecer defs spreadsheet and looked at the example for the base table. i inputted that and tweaked a little on that. i took it for a ride and woow! what a difference taking some advance out of the low loads and placing in the higher loads! it smoothed out alot on the low loads and drastically improved the high loads! what you were saying about the seeing real time is kinda what i was doing but was just a little unsure at first.i am learning alot from the forums and threads and it is as valuable a tool as the datalog in my opinion. hey thanks for all the help!
Click to expand...

Thats great

It does take a while to get an idea of what you can do with all that data or what it might be telling you

Looks like you are getting into the swing of things

btw ... 30 second search right here on our own little forum :SNSign: turned up these threads that may help you with your topic of intrest.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=492446&highlight=mbt
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=491446&highlight=mbt
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=485784&highlight=mbt
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=484207&highlight=mbt
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=482154&highlight=mbt

Grady
 

broken_joke

Member
Nov 24, 2004
138
0
16
carriere, ms
Dec 10, 2005
#30
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #30
thanks again
i guess it's time to do a little research!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
244
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
7
Engine Random hanging idle
  • 706 Saleen
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
446
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 19, 2026
86HO5.0
8
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
144
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
406
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?