Underdrive Pulley Bashing.

i have the March Piggybacks and IMO i didnt even get a placebo effect for the effort they take to do. not to mention the larger water pump pulley makes the lower alternator bolts in-accessable unless you take it off.
 
My buddys 4v is running like junk. Lets just say that hes got the bolt ons which include a set underdrive pulleys, yes he abuses his car and yes the problems is likely due to the undrives being on the car for some time. Its got 130000 miles on it. Its a 4v issue and not a 2v issue FTW period
 
Underdrive pullies won't cause any problems if they are installed correctly. I think they're worth the money for sure. $200 for 7-9WHP is DAMN good. Compare that to plenum/tb combo's ($300-400) for 9whp MAX. Get the non piggy back pullies like Steeda, and you can't go wrong. They won't ***** up your oil pump, or your crank.
 
the98stang said:
Underdrive pullies won't cause any problems if they are installed correctly. I think they're worth the money for sure. $200 for 7-9WHP is DAMN good. Compare that to plenum/tb combo's ($300-400) for 9whp MAX. Get the non piggy back pullies like Steeda, and you can't go wrong. They won't ***** up your oil pump, or your crank.

Just to make this clear, regardless of if they are installed correctly, if your engine sees high rpm like 7k they should be avoided. Even the non piggy back style. For most of us 2v guys this is not a problem.
 
An impact on a crank bolt? How do you torque that? Just a question.

My experience with the piggyback type isn't good. I went thru 2 alternators and 2 batteries in 3 years. I've had them off for 2 years now and have had zero issues with the alt and batt now. Just my experience...

If I did put them on again I'd go with Steeda's or similar that replace the crank pulley instead of piggybacing the stocker.
 
fwiw, I installed Steeda pullies over 3 years ago and have not had any issues with them. I think most problems are due to improper installation. Piggyback type pullies should be avoided, and 4v guys probably should skip pullies altogether.
:flag:
 
SilverBullet00 said:
And I thought you were suppose to run at MAX AC for the best temp and efficiency? Am I backwards?

You beat me to it. No. You are correct. Max AC is what you should run. I think people think the MAX means that it is maxing the AC out and it's running at its maximum potential. But it really means that the AC is running at Maximum Efficiency....:nice:
 
lover said:
You beat me to it. No. You are correct. Max AC is what you should run. I think people think the MAX means that it is maxing the AC out and it's running at its maximum potential. But it really means that the AC is running at Maximum Efficiency....:nice:
I'm pretty sure that on Max you close off the outside input of air which allows the cabin to cool better/quicker. On the normal setting the outside damper is open allowing outside air to mix with conditioned air. On most foriegn cars you have a open or closed selector for the outside air. Either way the AC runs cooler on max since there is no warm outside air to increase the temps.