• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Underdrive pulleys...convince me that they work.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dean85GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 10, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Turkey Sammich

I can't fap normal. I cracked a rib, then my ankle
Jul 12, 2006
0
59
154
Jan 12, 2007
#21
  • Jan 12, 2007
  • #21
Daggar said:
One day, I'll conduct my own test. I run all stock pullies at present and would love to swap on a set from one of the better companies on a Mustang Dyno to get a final result.
Click to expand...

Sounds like something to look forward to on the dyno thread.
 

Dean85GT

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
502
1
0
Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Jan 12, 2007
#22
  • Jan 12, 2007
  • #22
Well, do you guys think they are worth it in my current scenario? My car is running a 13.4 on a slick. My goal is to get down to 12s with the stock heads. The only mods I have yet to do (keeping the car NA and stock heads) are an E fan, U/D pulleys, 3g alternator and dumping my mufflers (current tailpipes are 2.25 crimp bent). Im relying on these mods to knock off 4 tenths. Am I being way too optimistic? My current 60' is a 1.80 but I think I may be able to improve it a little bit.
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Jan 13, 2007
#23
  • Jan 13, 2007
  • #23
Dean85GT said:
Well, do you guys think they are worth it in my current scenario? My car is running a 13.4 on a slick. My goal is to get down to 12s with the stock heads. The only mods I have yet to do (keeping the car NA and stock heads) are an E fan, U/D pulleys, 3g alternator and dumping my mufflers (current tailpipes are 2.25 crimp bent). Im relying on these mods to knock off 4 tenths. Am I being way too optimistic? My current 60' is a 1.80 but I think I may be able to improve it a little bit.
Click to expand...

I think regardless of whether pullies contribute anywhere from 0 to 13 hp based on the test results noted above and the theories (which Daggar appears to be committing to prove someday),I think you are being optimistic.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jan 13, 2007
#24
  • Jan 13, 2007
  • #24
U/D pullies won't make a real difference, but it is one of those "little" mods that are cheap and add up. Sometimes it's the little things that separate the winners from the loosers.

Main thing it does is reduces the acceleration of the accesories, this won't show much on a dyno because it is spinning up so slow, while in first gear with 4.10's.... it will show up.

I ran a 3"UD pulley as well, you could read the belt size when the engine was idling. I also kept my regular pulley in the car in case of, well IDK... but I could swap pulleys and it made a difference.

One thing about the accesories, is they not only add drag to the engine, but add a lot of weight as well. I have a FR manual rack, no ac, no smog.... just an alternator, going with an electric W/P. It might not be that much actuall HP, but the weight reduction alone will make a sizable difference, when I get an engine.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jan 13, 2007
#25
  • Jan 13, 2007
  • #25
Its funny, I read all the negetives with the U/D pulleys, but when I put mine on, it cured my battery dying issue (it would be fine day to day, dead after a weekend of no driving) and I actually felt a little SOTP difference. I have no proven numbers, but I rarely if ever "feel" a difference, and when the U/D pulleys where added, I did.
 
Reactions: OconnB

f4fntm

New Member
Oct 10, 2004
88
2
0
Olympia, WA
Jan 13, 2007
#26
  • Jan 13, 2007
  • #26
Regarding potential charging issues, you can always swap in an higher-output alternator. 'Course, that drives the cost of the project up...
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jan 13, 2007
#27
  • Jan 13, 2007
  • #27
or u can just put the stock alt pulley back on, the majority of the underdrive is in the crank and wp pulley. the alt pulley doesnt do much so i just took it off and put the stocker back on and cured my charging issues.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2007
#28
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #28
OK so do they give you more hp. A test was just done in the 5.0L mag with a 4.6L 3 valve mustang. I know its not a 5.0L but the underdrive pulleys netted 6 RWHP and 11RWTQ. so i guess one could say they work and are worth the time to install.
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
3
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Jan 22, 2007
#29
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #29
did anyone get the DVD with the feb issue of MM&FF....they dyno'd a 05 after a each bolt on and the pully's gave it like 8 RWHP
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 22, 2007
#30
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #30
I didn't get it but that looks to be about or close to about what 5.0 MUSTANG got aswell.
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Jan 22, 2007
#31
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #31
I have it, I have not watched it...I will though.
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
3
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Jan 22, 2007
#32
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #32
it cool if you have a 05....but I wish they would do the same with a 5.0....we were drinking one night and I thought I would play it cause nothing else was on
 

bill302

Active Member
Nov 2, 2005
2,131
1
46
alabama,gadsden
Jan 22, 2007
#33
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #33
bubba-dough said:
Maybe I am the lone person here but I think they are absolutely worthless junk. They are not worth the money. They gain what, 2hp on the wheels? At the cost of slowing you acc. Save your money. You will see more gain by eliminating the clutch fan like mentioned above.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underdrive_pulleys

An Underdrive pulley refers to an aftermarket crankshaft or accessory pulley (such as an alternator pulley) that is designed to drive a vehicle's accessories at a slower rate than stock. Originally they were invented for race cars in the 1950s and 60s, whose engines had been modified and ran at higher RPMs for longer periods of time than the manufacturers had intended. It was therefore necessary to underdrive the belt-driven accessories (among other things like the water pump) to keep the accessories from burning out and the engines running reliably.

Presently, these pulleys are marketed as performance enhancers that actually produce additional torque and horsepower by reducing parasitic drag caused by belt-driven accessories, or by being lighter and reducing rotational mass, or both. However, the gain is usually minimal, on the order of 1-6 wheel horsepower depending on the engine. There are trade-offs for this "free power," however.

Changing the original crankshaft pulley can have negative effects on the harmonics of the crankshaft: a pulley that is too light or not properly weighted cannot reliably balance natural frequencies that occur along the length of the crankshaft at certain RPMs. The original pulley may have been carefully designed, balanced and weighted to counteract (harmonically dampen) this naturally occurring harmonic frequency, and without it, eventual engine damage may result. See: Engine Balancing

A less severe side effect is somewhat intended by the design of these pulleys. Since the alternator, power steering, and/or air conditioning units are not spinning as fast, corresponding dips in alternator voltage, power assist, and A/C effectiveness may be noticeable, especially at idle. The headlights may dim when coming to a stop, or the stereo may lower in volume, for instance. For a race car, this is not of concern, but for a daily driven vehicle it can be an annoyance.
Click to expand...

could not say it better myself........"but for a daily driven vehicle it can be an annoyance", last sentance id the wikipedia link....
 

MikeC

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
240
0
16
SLC, UT
Jan 22, 2007
#34
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #34
I look at it this way, each little increase adds up to a lot. Pulleys 3-5 hp, K&N air with silencer removal 3-5 hp, increase timing to 14 degrees 3-5 hp, shorty headers 5-10 hp, synthetic oil in engine, trans and diff 3-5 hp. Pretty soon you have an increase of 17 to 30 more hp. each one alone is unnoticable, add them up it's noticable. IMHO
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jan 23, 2007
#35
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #35
MikeC said:
I look at it this way, each little increase adds up to a lot. Pulleys 3-5 hp, K&N air with silencer removal 3-5 hp, increase timing to 14 degrees 3-5 hp, shorty headers 5-10 hp, synthetic oil in engine, trans and diff 3-5 hp. Pretty soon you have an increase of 17 to 30 more hp. each one alone is unnoticable, add them up it's noticable. IMHO
Click to expand...

No no no, this is not how power is made. They don't add up in a linear fashion like this. This is the kinda thinking you get from the ricer kids who after adding up all their +hp mods they've got 350 horse from a 1.5L with ebay boltons.

These "mods" only free, or release horsepower, they do not make horsepower. The first 5 horses are easy to free, the next 5 are harder, and the next 5 harder still.

Any one of these mods standing alone might free up 5 horses. But two mods will free up maybe 7. Three mods maybe 8 or 9. It does not add up linearly.

So real world, do the rest of them, don't bother with the pulleys because after it's said and done you're not getting anything but less coolant flow, less charging, less power steering flow resulting in shorter power steering pump life, and less air pump function making emissions harder to pass.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Jan 23, 2007
#36
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #36
Is it not true that the 93 Cobra came with a set of reduction pulleys (not true underdrive) compared to the OEM 5.0 set?
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jan 23, 2007
#37
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #37
I think the $85 that pulleys cost is worth it. I have under drives, no charging issues, and love them!
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Jan 23, 2007
#38
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #38
Dear god don't put those on your car. If you do only put the one on the crank unless you have a 3g alternator. Just from 10 years experience with underdrives.
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Jan 23, 2007
#39
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #39
When I installed mine they seem to give the car a little more torque, or it could have been the fact that the engine reved faster. JMO.
 

MikeC

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
240
0
16
SLC, UT
Jan 23, 2007
#40
  • Jan 23, 2007
  • #40
seijirou said:
No no no, this is not how power is made. They don't add up in a linear fashion like this. This is the kinda thinking you get from the ricer kids who after adding up all their +hp mods they've got 350 horse from a 1.5L with ebay boltons.
Click to expand...

So your saying if full synthetics alone give 5 hp. And bumping timing to 14-15 degrees alone gives 5 hp. But together you will only get 7 hp? So the timing somehow effects the physical properties of the oil so there is less friction reduction? I quoting real world hp gains, not the crap quoted from manufactures the ricers go by. Besides thats why I gave a range of hp values, it's easy to get 17 hp from the mods I listed and not impossible to get 30.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
572
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
178
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
711
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?