• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

vacuum secondaries -vs- mechanical... throttle response

  • Thread starter Thread starter BelueLX
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2004

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Jun 1, 2004
#1
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #1
Ive heard to get a carb with mechanical secondaries for throttle response / drag racing. I found a good deal on one with vacuum secondaries. How much will the vacuum secondaries hurt me off the line and at the strip? Havent really dealt with carbs much Ive always had efi. Thanks,

Cody B
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 1, 2004
#2
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #2
I am running a Quick Fuel 850 w/ vac sec and I have a 1.70 60' time. A friend of mine is running a 750 double pumper and has about the same 60' time. Its funny that the guys running carbs are looking into EFI and the EFI guys are looking at carbs.
 

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Jun 1, 2004
#3
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #3
best 60' with the charger was a 1.74. im going to try the vac carb if i dont like it i can always sell it for what i paid.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Jun 1, 2004
#4
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #4
My Classic Mustang will stay carbed until the world runs out of oil.

But any new car I ever buy would stay EFI.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jun 2, 2004
#5
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #5
vacuum vs mechanical secondaries have been debated since forever it seems. depending on your combination i doubt you will lose much if at all, and the difference in driveability between the two can be great on the street, again depending on your combo.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 2, 2004
#6
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #6
What I've heard is that mechanical secondaries are better for manual transmission cars, vacuum for automatics. But, that is for the street, I think.

If you go to Holley's web site, you can email them and get the experts' opinion.
 

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Jun 2, 2004
#7
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #7
another question: with a C4 transmission and a 3.73 gear, how many miles per gallon is normal?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 2, 2004
#8
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #8
Cant you make a vaccuum secondary carburetor perform as if it has mechanical secondaries simply by modifying the throttle linkages on the carb?
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Jun 2, 2004
#9
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #9
allcarfan said:
Cant you make a vaccuum secondary carburetor perform as if it has mechanical secondaries simply by modifying the throttle linkages on the carb?
Click to expand...

You can, but that presents a problem. You don't have the extra squirt of fuel that a second accelerator pump provides, which would mean you would bog out pretty bad.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 2, 2004
#10
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #10
Great68 said:
You can, but that presents a problem. You don't have the extra squirt of fuel that a second accelerator pump provides, which would mean you would bog out pretty bad.
Click to expand...

Exactly. You would have just built an expensive Edelbog.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 2, 2004
#11
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #11
grrrr, wish my speed demon was mech secondaries
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
429
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
3
94 Gt to 84 Fox
  • 351C-84'Fox
  • May 16, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2024
351C-84'Fox
3
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?