I installed a Versailles rearend underneath my '65 coupe about 8 years ago. My memory may be failing me after all the
since that time
, but I seem to recall the mags saying at the time that the Versailles rear was 1/2" narrower on each side than the stock '65 8" rear it replaced. I have seen posts on this forum that indicate the Versailles rear is 1/2" wider, the same width, and/or 1/2" narrower on each side. However, most of the wheel threads I have seen on here say 4.75" backspacing is the max for a '65, and I seem to recall my backspacing being 4.5" on an 8" wheel, which would obviously put the wheels in the leafs if its as narrow as I am thinking, or too far out if the rear is 1/2" wider. I have rolled fender lips on the rear, but I'm running a 265/50-15 BFG, which it seems would not work if the rear is 1/2" wider. Anyone know the absolute truth here?
P.S. This is simply a curiosity post, and the car is 2.5 hours away. I know how to measure backspacing and will do so when I buy new wheels. No lessons necessary.
since that time
, but I seem to recall the mags saying at the time that the Versailles rear was 1/2" narrower on each side than the stock '65 8" rear it replaced. I have seen posts on this forum that indicate the Versailles rear is 1/2" wider, the same width, and/or 1/2" narrower on each side. However, most of the wheel threads I have seen on here say 4.75" backspacing is the max for a '65, and I seem to recall my backspacing being 4.5" on an 8" wheel, which would obviously put the wheels in the leafs if its as narrow as I am thinking, or too far out if the rear is 1/2" wider. I have rolled fender lips on the rear, but I'm running a 265/50-15 BFG, which it seems would not work if the rear is 1/2" wider. Anyone know the absolute truth here?
P.S. This is simply a curiosity post, and the car is 2.5 hours away. I know how to measure backspacing and will do so when I buy new wheels. No lessons necessary.