• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

victor jr intake to much for 347

  • Thread starter Thread starter D's 91 stang gt
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2007
D

D's 91 stang gt

New Member
Jul 6, 2005
43
0
0
May 27, 2007
#1
  • May 27, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys the 347 is almost cmplete needing an intake now is the victor jr to much for a na 347?? it's has eldebrock heads 190 202" and the have been port and polisehed with a 3 angle valve job. 42pound injectors 75mm throttle body 75mm mass air a decent size cam. if this intake is to much then what would be a good one?? one guy suggested a carb style intake with a wilson manafold elbow but that might be overkill also
 
W

wicked84gt350

New Member
Aug 20, 2006
113
1
0
West palm bech florida
May 27, 2007
#2
  • May 27, 2007
  • #2
Well its hard to say with out knowing more info on the cam and flow numbers of the heads. But if the the eddys were out of the box castings then the victor junior would be way more than they could ever flow but you said they have some work done on them so I would say if your cam is pretty healthy then you might consider it because you have the cubes the biggest loss with the bigger intake is you lose low end torque but you get it all back and then some in the mid and upper range. The victor junior efi manifold is very nice and it is not as much as a problem as running the carbed vic jr because the runners in the efi are still pretty long. If I were you I would also look into the trick flow r series manifold or holley system max both are very nice manifolds. the main thing is look were you cam makes its power and choose the intake that matches that range.
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
May 27, 2007
#3
  • May 27, 2007
  • #3
i would put it on there and not look back
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
May 27, 2007
#4
  • May 27, 2007
  • #4
After my experience with a Victor 5.0 on a 302, you should go with a SuperVictor 8.2 for that 347
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 28, 2007
#5
  • May 28, 2007
  • #5
Well I would assume the combo is pretty healthy since you are using a 42# inj, hopefully you have a tuner because they are going to dumo way too much fuel down low. I use the Victor 5.0 all the time on healthy 347's, 10.5:1comp+, properly cammed they work very well. If you find it lacks a little down low you can add a 1" spacer to move the power band around...you'd be surprise what 1" of runner length does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
NEW 347 WON'T IDLE
  • Zeffer
  • Nov 29, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2022
Zeffer
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
H
Prepping for FI
  • Hmdballa219
  • Sep 21, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 23, 2020
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?