• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Volvo 4V Head on 2.3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saleenx029
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Oct 9, 2004
#21
  • Oct 9, 2004
  • #21
Corrutpforlife said:
I have a 1979 2.3 turbocharged mustang will that head fit on that year also? I've only heard of it on merurks? I was thinking of fabracating an intake for a 4 barrell also but I'm not sure if it had enough CFM for that?
Click to expand...

All Merkurs use the same 2.3Ts as the SVO, TC and the Mustang GT 350. The only difference between the 2.3Ts is the EEC I think and some are not IC. The thing about the Volvo head is you have to plug all the oil holes in the head and redrill new ones that match up with the ones on the 2.3 block. This takes time and really knowing what your doing. Then everything has to be fabercated like the exhaust manifold, intakes, and brakets. Also I would stick to EFFI if you go thise route..
 
C

Corrutpforlife

New Member
Oct 6, 2004
3
0
0
Oct 10, 2004
#22
  • Oct 10, 2004
  • #22
Thanks for the help.
 

TurboFlush

Founding Member
Dec 8, 1999
1,984
0
0
Germany
Oct 10, 2004
#23
  • Oct 10, 2004
  • #23
Corrutpforlife said:
I have a 1979 2.3 turbocharged mustang will that head fit on that year also? I've only heard of it on merurks? I was thinking of fabracating an intake for a 4 barrell also but I'm not sure if it had enough CFM for that?
Click to expand...
Can I poke fun at this. LOL I am going to be nice and not.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Oct 11, 2004
#24
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #24
Those of you that think this is ever going to be "easy" once all the bugs are worked out are crazy...it's not gonna happen. This will always be a difficult (or expensive) thing to do...not too say it wouldn't be fun once complete.

There are more DOHC 2.3's running around then you know about as well...one of them is in the low 9's or high 8's (can't remember).
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Oct 11, 2004
#25
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #25
Stinger said:
Those of you that think this is ever going to be "easy" once all the bugs are worked out are crazy...it's not gonna happen. This will always be a difficult (or expensive) thing to do...not too say it wouldn't be fun once complete.

There are more DOHC 2.3's running around then you know about as well...one of them is in the low 9's or high 8's (can't remember).
Click to expand...

I would think its a hair more cost effective to just get a SOHC 2.3T into the 9's than to build a 9's DOHC 2.3T. But I guess it all depends on if your doing the work on the DOHC swap or paying someone to do it
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Oct 11, 2004
#26
  • Oct 11, 2004
  • #26
Well, considering you will almost certainly have to use an aluminum essy head (or a big shot of nitrous) to get a 2.3 mustang into the 9's...that's 1500-3000 dollars you have to spend on the DOHC head
 
F

FknBadFkr

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
76
0
0
Charleston,SC
Dec 15, 2004
#27
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #27
ill have about 800 bux into my Volvo head,header,intake,and machine work and pistons with rings from Diamond......the pistons were bout 400 bux and the most expensive part of this............Hal
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Dec 15, 2004
#28
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #28
FknBadFkr said:
ill have about 800 bux into my Volvo head,header,intake,and machine work and pistons with rings from Diamond......the pistons were bout 400 bux and the most expensive part of this............Hal
Click to expand...

Like I said it really depends on whos doing the work and what deals you get on parts doesn't hurt either. Just post some pic from time to time as you do this.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
624
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
What in gods green earth happend to my N/A 2.3?
  • Piranahbite
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 1, 2024
Piranahbite
Chevy Equinox- Devil in Disguise?
  • RaggedGT
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
18
Views
658
Other Auto Tech Jul 31, 2025
RaggedGT
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?