• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Vortech or Kenne Bell

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndiguy
  • Start date Start date Jul 22, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 22, 2011
#1
  • Jul 22, 2011
  • #1
I know this question has been asked before but here is my situation. I have an 04 GT auto with 4.10s, CAI, Magnaflow catback and Diablosport tuner. The car runs good but I'd like to make it a faster street machine with no real plans for the track. Supercharging seems the way to go but I really can't spend much more than $4000. At about $4200 for the Kenne Bell non I/C (incl tax. I live in SoCal), I could swing it. Can't consider the intercooled kit at $5400. I could get the Vortech V-3 kit for about $3700 delivered to my door. Seems like meth injection can be added to increase boost for the Vortech. I really like the Kenne Bell but am wary of high IAT's and heat soak with the non I/C kit. Plus I'm wondering if my gears are too steep for a PD blower. BTW, the car isn't a DD. Anyway, haven't driven either blower but did have a turbo eclipse long ago that was fun. Which one should I get?
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Jul 22, 2011
#2
  • Jul 22, 2011
  • #2
Vortech and meth with your budget. Meth does not increase boost itself. It cools down your IAT's, allowing you to get more aggressive with the tune. You might even get away with a smaller pulley, which will increase boost. I gained 50rwhp and 70rwtq with meth alone on my V3.
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 22, 2011
#3
  • Jul 22, 2011
  • #3
Thanks for the reply. I have been leaning toward the Vortech based on price and ability to add meth instead of intercooler/aftercooler to lower IAT's and increase boost.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,265
21,445
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 22, 2011
#4
  • Jul 22, 2011
  • #4
You can use meth on either setup and with or without an intercooler.

Were it me, there's little chance I'd ad either power adder without an inter/after cooler.
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 22, 2011
#5
  • Jul 22, 2011
  • #5
I know that meth injection can be used with roots and twin screw blowers but it seems people have more problems with that setup than with a centrifugal. If IAT's are the problem then inter/after coolers are probably the best way to solve them. Meth injection should do the same as long as the juice keeps flowing. I like the Kenne Bell but the non I/C kit with factory tune is set up at 5 psi and 18* timing. I figure that to be about 80 rwhp. Safe for 91 octane according to K. Bell. The intercooled kit is out of the question for now. Just ask my wife.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Jul 23, 2011
#6
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #6
Don't tell your wife. Mine has been in the shop for "minor repairs" due to a mechanical error for over 2 months. Still have another 6 weeks to go.

I wouldn't bother with vortechs aftercooler kit. Use somebody elses intercooler if you go that route. I'd get a standard vortech kit, and have it dyno tuned. Keep the boost at 6 psi, spray some meth and make more power. Add the intercooler when you have the funds.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jul 23, 2011
#7
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #7
I like my KB but I'm sure if I had a Vortech I'd like that too. You can't go wrong with either.

I would save a bit longer and splurge for the intercooled option. I know you can technically run non-intercooled but on a stock shortblock it's nice insurance to help keep IATs under control and to have the margin to up the boost later -- which you will want to do.

Winters has the right idea: The Vortech is an easier kit to which to add an intercooler later. The integration of the intercooler in the KB kit packaging means you sort of have to make that decision up front and are stuck with it thereafter.

One thing to keep in mind: Living in SoCal means you are going to want to go with a full kit with the all-important CARB exemption number or you'll be having registration issues out the wazoo...
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jul 23, 2011
#8
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #8
As long as you have a good tune and don't beat on it during hot summer days you will be fine. A cheaper and better option than going with the Vortech aftercooler is the Paxton Air to Air setup. Or piece together a CX Racing setup. The only downside is you will have to change MAF, and get a different tune since the MAF would have to be located in a different location.
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 23, 2011
#9
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #9
The CARB exemption is a good point which unfortunately makes it difficult to go with an aftermarket intercooler in California. I thought about having two tunes, one with meth and one without. When it's time for smog check, just pull the meth kit and install a different tune. A lot easier than pulling an intercooler without CARB cert. I don't know how thoroughly the smog people look at those setups. One of the things that concerns me about the KB is the 4.10s in my car. Some say that 4.10s are too steep for a PD blower. Don't really want to swap gears at this point.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jul 23, 2011
#10
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #10
Ah, my reading comprehension beats me again. I would definitely think about a flipchip from SCT after it is tuned with a high quality meth kit then.

The Vortech Aftercooler is just very inefficient. And the CX Racing intercooler kit is cheaper and more efficient too. Although I live in FL my car suffers some since it is non intercooled as well, but I just don't stay in boost all day driving it and with a stock pulley still hitting 7-9lbs with stock motor, in the hot summer humidity. Although it does hit 10lbs in cooler weather too..
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 23, 2011
#11
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #11
I know there are no easy answers doing a s/c on a budget. I have to go with a kit due to CARB restrictions. Since you have a non-intercooled setup, are you satisfied with that as far as power goes? Does Vortech program their chip to include the speedo change for my 4.10s?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,265
21,445
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 23, 2011
#12
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #12
In reference to the heat soak issue above:

I just wanted to clear a couple misconceptions...

Centri blowers produce a higher blower outlet temp then virtually ANY twin screw.
Twins screws don't heat soak intakes. Hot intakes heat soak twin screw manifolds.

If you're going sans aftercooler, then a PD blower is where it's at.

If you're able to afford an aftercooler for a centri system then that's where I would go.

On a modular motor, if you ARE able to afford the aftercooler under a PD then I would go that direction.

I agree that retro-fitting an aftercooler to a PD blower after the fact can be expensive and sometimes problematic.

It is def easier to pipe one into a centri blower after the fact and cheaper at the beginning.

All that said, and budget being the central issue, I think your best bet would be a quality centri setup... with after cooler (ATI with air to air) would be my pick.
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 23, 2011
#13
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #13
I realize that heat is an issue with any s/c. If $5400 was not an issue, I would probably go with the KB intercooled. Right now, adding at least 100 hp to my car would be a big improvement. So are you saying that heat is less of an issue with non I/C KB than a non I/C Vortech?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,265
21,445
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 23, 2011
#14
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #14
Correct. Heat is less of an issue with a non-intercooled KB vs. a non-intercooled Vortech because the blower discharge temps are lower with the KB.

However... (comma) Like said above. It's considerably easier and less expensive to add an intercooler to a Vortech kit, down the road.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,265
21,445
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 23, 2011
#15
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #15
I don't know if you get and keep Modified Mustangs Magazine, but the September 2008 issue has an article about blower myths. The article is actually part 3 of a multi-issue article. Worth checking out if you have them or know someone who does.
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Jul 23, 2011
#16
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #16
ndiguy said:
I know there are no easy answers doing a s/c on a budget. I have to go with a kit due to CARB restrictions. Since you have a non-intercooled setup, are you satisfied with that as far as power goes? Does Vortech program their chip to include the speedo change for my 4.10s?
Click to expand...

I pieced my kit together so I had mine dyno tuned here at a local shop. My tuner adjusted for my 3.73's and my request to keep traction control off when he just flashed my ecu. I have a 140k mile stock motor with enough fuel to be safe till the limits of the motor are reached. I am more than happy with my power output. I might add an intercooler when I build a motor for this but for my stock motor I wouldn't want to risk blowing up my DD to get higher than the 380rwhp/378tq I am at.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,265
21,445
234
Box behind Walmart
Jul 23, 2011
#17
  • Jul 23, 2011
  • #17
joshjwc9 said:
I pieced my kit together so I had mine dyno tuned here at a local shop. My tuner adjusted for my 3.73's and my request to keep traction control off when he just flashed my ecu. I have a 140k mile stock motor with enough fuel to be safe till the limits of the motor are reached. I am more than happy with my power output. I might add an intercooler when I build a motor for this but for my stock motor I wouldn't want to risk blowing up my DD to get higher than the 380rwhp/378tq I am at.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that it's not what you meant with this post but it read a little odd and wanted to just add something:

Adding an intercooler would not make your setup more likely to grenade. Just the opposite. Intake heat is reduced (of course), so timing can be increased (of course), and if the correct balance is truck then there's no detonation. You'd also be able to run a leaner fuel curve. If anything, the addition of an intercooler makes for WIDER tuning window where the lack thereof means a narrower window where more attention has to be paid to ensure no detonation.

In your case Josh... add the intercooler when you're able. Your motor will thank you. So will your fuel bill.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jul 24, 2011
#18
  • Jul 24, 2011
  • #18
Why not look into the Tork Tech kit with a used Eaton M112 off a Terminator? Cheap, intercooled, and will make more power than the options you're looking at.
 
N

ndiguy

New Member
May 1, 2011
13
0
1
Jul 25, 2011
#19
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #19
I considered Tork Tech but I don't think their kits are CARB certified. It might not pass California smog check. I love the weather but Prius and Smart cars are thick as flies where I live.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jul 25, 2011
#20
  • Jul 25, 2011
  • #20
ndiguy said:
I considered Tork Tech but I don't think their kits are CARB certified. It might not pass California smog check. I love the weather but Prius and Smart cars are thick as flies where I live.
Click to expand...

Oh, you're right. My bad.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
711
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
C
Vortech water pump and tensioner pulley issue
  • Crooner88
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2025
revhead347
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
T
Forced Induction Vortech Pulley Question (Long Read)
  • tinker451
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 23, 2020
tinker451
T
B
03 GT Forged Internals info ect.
  • Borla2K3
  • Jan 24, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2019
Dark04GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?