• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Electrical VSS question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mcmahst
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2024

Mcmahst

5 Year Member
Jan 19, 2021
662
259
83
Laguna Woods CA, fort Mohave AZ
Nov 22, 2024
#1
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #1
I swapped an 87 TBird 5.0 drivetrain into a 73 Mustang and as part of that swap, I did not include the VSS sensor.mI was going over my notes and stuff regarding the wiring harness I made, and I found a note I wrote that said, I don’t need the VSS because I did not bring the cruise control over as part of the swap. Am I wrong; do I need the ECU to see that input? I’m starting to second guess that decision since I cannot find where that original note idea came from.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,774
3,912
183
Claremore, OK
Nov 22, 2024
#2
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #2
VSS is used for two things which are cruise control and strategy in the ECU. If the VSS is not hooked up the cruise will not work and some have experienced stalling. Here are the ECU wiring diagrams for the various years of Mustangs:

86 - 88 non-California cars


88 California cars - 91 (early)


91 (late) - 93


You can see that on the mass air cars (88 California -93) Pins 3 & 6 are for the VSS sensor and on the non-mass air cars (86-88 non-California) they do not have it.

With all of this being said you used a motor, wiring harness, and ECU from an 1987 Thunderbird 5.0 so it was a non-mass air car and non-HO. Best place to get information on those cars is here:

Fox T-Bird/Cougar Forums - Index

Fox T-Bird/Cougar Forums - Index
foxtbirdcougarforums.com
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,852
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2024
#3
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #3
Speed Density cars do not use the VSS for anything other than cruise control. My '88 (originally SD) didn't have factory cruise, so there wasn't even a VSS on the car.

If you convert to mass air at all, you would need the VSS for the ECU, but if you are still running the t-bird speed density ECU than it is not required.
 

Mcmahst

5 Year Member
Jan 19, 2021
662
259
83
Laguna Woods CA, fort Mohave AZ
Nov 22, 2024
#4
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #4
Thank you gentlemen, I now remember. I’ll hang on to the VSS in case some day I go MA.
 

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
625
347
83
Lexington, KY
Nov 23, 2024
#5
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #5
Mustang5L5 said:
Speed Density cars do not use the VSS for anything other than cruise control. My '88 (originally SD) didn't have factory cruise, so there wasn't even a VSS on the car.

If you convert to mass air at all, you would need the VSS for the ECU, but if you are still running the t-bird speed density ECU than it is not required.
Click to expand...
I converted my ‘86 to MAF using the Ford Motorsports kit. My ‘86 didn’t have cruise control, hence no VSS, and the kit instructions didn’t say it was necessary. I’m not aware that I’ve ever had an issue with not having VSS.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,058
2,664
224
Vass, NC
Nov 23, 2024
#6
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #6
If you pull the VSS out of an MAF car, it'll still work, but since it always tells the computer you're going 0 mph, you will not have the buffer the EEC builds in when coasting down to a stop. Anyone that has the VSS will notice that the computer adds a little RPM that finally settles when the car drops under 5mph. That extra RPM buffer is nice to have, because it reduces the chances of the car from stalling and helps the car settle back down to idle softly.

I'm still a newb with the A9L programming, but this is what I've inferred so far. There may be more.
 
Reactions: Willybill32

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
625
347
83
Lexington, KY
Nov 23, 2024
#7
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #7
FastDriver said:
If you pull the VSS out of an MAF car, it'll still work, but since it always tells the computer you're going 0 mph, you will not have the buffer the EEC builds in when coasting down to a stop. Anyone that has the VSS will notice that the computer adds a little RPM that finally settles when the car drops under 5mph. That extra RPM buffer is nice to have, because it reduces the chances of the car from stalling and helps the car settle back down to idle softly.

I'm still a newb with the A9L programming, but this is what I've inferred so far. There may be more.
Click to expand...
@FastDriver, thanks! Interesting that I've never had an issue with the idle dropping down or stalling. Recent mods (HCI, headers, etc.) resulted in an issue with "jerking" at idle speeds...wonder if the VSS would help with that.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,827
10,508
203
polk county florida
Nov 23, 2024
#8
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #8
Willybill32 said:
@FastDriver, thanks! Interesting that I've never had an issue with the idle dropping down or stalling. Recent mods (HCI, headers, etc.) resulted in an issue with "jerking" at idle speeds...wonder if the VSS would help with that.
Click to expand...
The 'jerking' at low RPMs likely is caused by the duration on the cam, valve overlap, JMO.
Installing a VSS will not help in this case
 
Reactions: Mcmahst and Willybill32

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
625
347
83
Lexington, KY
Nov 23, 2024
#9
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #9
General karthief said:
The 'jerking' at low RPMs likely is caused by the duration on the cam, valve overlap, JMO.
Installing a VSS will not help in this case
Click to expand...
@General karthief, thanks. The cam has always been the prime suspect. It’s an E303, wish I would have gone with a newer design…
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,827
10,508
203
polk county florida
Nov 23, 2024
#10
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #10
What gear you got in the back?
 

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
625
347
83
Lexington, KY
Nov 23, 2024
#11
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #11
General karthief said:
What gear you got in the back?
Click to expand...
3.55
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
Mod Dude
Aug 25, 2016
27,827
10,508
203
polk county florida
Nov 23, 2024
#12
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #12
Good choice
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,852
224
Massachusetts
Nov 23, 2024
#13
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #13
Willybill32 said:
I converted my ‘86 to MAF using the Ford Motorsports kit. My ‘86 didn’t have cruise control, hence no VSS, and the kit instructions didn’t say it was necessary. I’m not aware that I’ve ever had an issue with not having VSS.
Click to expand...

The issues that would arise from not having it is that the vehicle may stall when coming from a stop. So if you notice the car doing that on occasion you would likely want to add it.

But on the 89+ MAF cars it is referenced by the ECU
 
Reactions: General karthief and Willybill32

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
625
347
83
Lexington, KY
Nov 23, 2024
#14
  • Nov 23, 2024
  • #14
Mustang5L5 said:
The issues that would arise from not having it is that the vehicle may stall when coming from a stop. So if you notice the car doing that on occasion you would likely want to add it.

But on the 89+ MAF cars it is referenced by the ECU
Click to expand...
Funny…that’s never been an issue.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,160
17,852
224
Massachusetts
Nov 24, 2024
#15
  • Nov 24, 2024
  • #15
If it’s not an issue, don’t worry about it. Just keep it in back of mind in case you ever notice the stalling out.
 
Reactions: Mcmahst and Willybill32
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

82 Gen 1 Coyote Swap AC Questions...
  • thinkfaster
  • Aug 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
thinkfaster
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
560
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
371
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 5, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Fuel 87 5.0 Fuel rail lines
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
960
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 11, 2025
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?