• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Weak point of 2 valve 4.6 motor.. RPM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OinkAodeOink
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
44
Daytona bch, Florida
www.turbochargedinnovation.com
Apr 4, 2005
#1
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #1
I've been wondering, just what is it that seems to kill the stock power adder 2 valve 99-04 GT motors? Is it high rpm, or simply a bad tune? From what I gathered, the rods seem to let go first, being everything else is in check. Now my question is.. Say I build a low RPM turbo setup..full boost by 2500rpm, max out around 5k RPM, would this in theory, keep the motor somewhat more safe, then a motor that sees 6k rpm? If it's as simple as detonation killing these motors, that can be kept in check with achohol injection or simply running very low boost levels, and an efficient turbo setup.

Im sure I would be content with 450 to the wheels ( for a week ) If I could keep it all in tact, by keeping the RPM's low, enough fuel, and safe of detonation, with a low amount of boost (under 10psi)
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 4, 2005
#2
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #2
OinkAodeOink said:
I've been wondering, just what is it that seems to kill the stock power adder 2 valve 99-04 GT motors? Is it high rpm, or simply a bad tune?
Click to expand...

Mostly the latter from what I've read, depending on what you're after. I think the factory components are strength-limited to something like 500HP, in theory, but I'm sure there are 2Vs making that and more on stock internals...they just have very good tunes and live life on the edge. Keeping the engine from experiencing detonation is all about the tune, ensuring the quality of fuel and being realistic with the boost level.

From what I gathered, the rods seem to let go first, being everything else is in check. Now my question is.. Say I build a low RPM turbo setup..full boost by 2500rpm, max out around 5k RPM, would this in theory, keep the motor somewhat more safe, then a motor that sees 6k rpm? If it's as simple as detonation killing these motors, that can be kept in check with achohol injection or simply running very low boost levels, and an efficient turbo setup.

Im sure I would be content with 450 to the wheels ( for a week ) If I could keep it all in tact, by keeping the RPM's low, enough fuel, and safe of detonation, with a low amount of boost (under 10psi)
Click to expand...

Ironically, getting max boost early in the RPM range might be worse for the motor than running it to redline since under those conditions (high cylinder pressure, low RPM) you're more likely to detonate. I don't think there's one magic bullet...you need a combination of moderate boost, good fuel, reasonable RPM and a good tune all together, especially on stock internals. 450 at the wheels? On stock - powdered rods and hypereutectic pistons and a cast crank - internals? Even with a good tune that might be pushing it if you want it to live for a while.
 

ProCharger GT

Member
Jun 3, 2004
153
0
16
Cleveland
Apr 4, 2005
#3
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #3
 

my_03GT

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
186
0
0
50
DE
Apr 4, 2005
#4
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #4
According to Kenne Bell's web site, high rpm kills engine's, not horsepower. Keep it out of the red with a good tune and it will be fine.
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
51
Elwood, IN
sir_not_appearing.home.insightbb.com
Apr 4, 2005
#5
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #5
Engine RPM seems to be the culprit. There are plenty of guys that have lost their bottom-ends on naturally aspirated cars shifting at 6500RPM. In a car with heads and cams,that is a fairly optimal shiftpoint, but the stock internals don't like to do it very long.
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
44
Daytona bch, Florida
www.turbochargedinnovation.com
Apr 4, 2005
#6
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #6
Yea, the car is completely stock as far as the motor. Making 450 or more on the factory longblock won't be the problem, with the turbo setup.. I'm more concerned about what I can do to keep out of trouble, while still running a power adder.

Im new to the modular engines, so I was not sure just how strong, or weak they are with the factory goods in place.

BTW, the car is an 01 with a 4R70w trans, and will have a 62-1 or T70 single setup, with supporting modifications.
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Apr 4, 2005
#7
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #7
High rpm kills in the long.But then again i hang out with someone on this board that likes to hold rev's,and his 2V keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going ....You got the picture.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Apr 4, 2005
#8
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #8
i agree with the guy that posted about keeping a good tune and resonable boost levels...

as long as your not over the red line you should be fine as far as rpm... detonation is the killer of boosted motors...
 
D

damien2003gt

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
181
0
0
Apr 4, 2005
#9
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #9
1low03gt said:
High rpm kills in the long.But then again i hang out with someone on this board that likes to hold rev's,and his 2V keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going,keeps going ....You got the picture.
Click to expand...



lol. Hey I'm not that bad! Yes I may crusie around now and then at 5200rpm down town but it aint that hard on the engine.lol I don't drive like that "all" the time. Mind you, I never shift under 4500 RPM..... Ah whatever WTF, its an OHV, it love to rev!
 
K

kj2833

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
75
0
0
central illinois
Apr 4, 2005
#10
  • Apr 4, 2005
  • #10
damien2003gt said:
WTF, its an OHV, it love to rev!
Click to expand...

Im sure you meant OHC,


I forgive you though
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Apr 5, 2005
#11
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #11
Although KB says high rpm is what kills engines, you should ask the guy at modulardepot (can't remember his name) who went in to 9 psi boost in fifth gear at around 2k rpm and blew it up.
 

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Apr 5, 2005
#12
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #12
Stock internals are not designed to run above 6000rpm. That's where we stopped measuring the dyno, while the power was still climbing... But to go beyond 6000rpm, we need better springs/heads/valves than stock ones...
Also my previous saleen blower was making it's peak HP at 5000rpm, but think it was more damaging my engine though
 
1

1qko3

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
13
0
0
45
Colton, CA
Apr 5, 2005
#13
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #13
sgarlic said:
Although KB says high rpm is what kills engines, you should ask the guy at modulardepot (can't remember his name) who went in to 9 psi boost in fifth gear at around 2k rpm and blew it up.
Click to expand...


I don't think that is the same thing. If you start at a stop and go threw the gears shifting at 4,800 rpm that is alot easier on the motor than reving it to the rev limiter. But low rpm and alot of boost kills also if you are in a high gear.
 

HandofDoom_

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
20
0
0
Oh god, did you eat all this acid?
Apr 5, 2005
#14
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #14
450 rwhp, goodbye stock block.
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
44
Daytona bch, Florida
www.turbochargedinnovation.com
Apr 5, 2005
#15
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #15
HandofDoom_ said:
450 rwhp, goodbye stock block.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression that the stock block is rather strong.. as in much stronger then the 5.0 blocks. The modular blocks look much more beefy.

Or are you refering to the stock longblock? (not actual block)
 

my_03GT

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
186
0
0
50
DE
Apr 5, 2005
#16
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #16
1qko3 said:
I don't think that is the same thing. If you start at a stop and go threw the gears shifting at 4,800 rpm that is alot easier on the motor than reving it to the rev limiter. But low rpm and alot of boost kills also if you are in a high gear.
Click to expand...
I agree completely...what would you expect if you were in 5th gear and throw it to the floor with 2,000 rpm....can't be good...5th is overdrive,gas saver not for racing, when was the last time you hit 5th at the track???
 
1

1qko3

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
13
0
0
45
Colton, CA
Apr 5, 2005
#17
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #17
OinkAodeOink said:
I was under the impression that the stock block is rather strong.. as in much stronger then the 5.0 blocks. The modular blocks look much more beefy.

Or are you refering to the stock longblock? (not actual block)
Click to expand...

If HandofDoom knows what he is talking about he meant the internals not the block. And a stock 4.6 block will take a hell of a lot more hp than 450.
 

HandofDoom_

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
20
0
0
Oh god, did you eat all this acid?
Apr 5, 2005
#18
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #18
1qko3 said:
If HandofDoom knows what he is talking about he meant the internals not the block. And a stock 4.6 block will take a hell of a lot more hp than 450.
Click to expand...

I was talking about the shortblock, read as internals, not precisely the same thing but you get the idea.

Anyhoo, I have spoke to some people in the past and they said they've seen GT's break on the dyno @ much less than 350 rwhp.
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Apr 5, 2005
#19
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #19
damien2003gt said:
lol. Hey I'm not that bad! Yes I may crusie around now and then at 5200rpm down town but it aint that hard on the engine.lol I don't drive like that "all" the time. Mind you, I never shift under 4500 RPM..... Ah whatever WTF, its an OHV, it love to rev!
Click to expand...
Hey,i didn't mention any names....

But then again i hang out with someone on this board
Click to expand...

.... LOL!!!
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Apr 5, 2005
#20
  • Apr 5, 2005
  • #20
HandofDoom_ said:
450 rwhp, goodbye stock block.
Click to expand...


thats only kinda true... a very very very good tune and the stock internals can survive more than that... but what are the chances of never getting detonation..

forged high quality parts give you a lot more survivabliity if the motor gets into preignition...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
348
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
956
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
8
planning project of adding a supercharger
  • 87fox72mach
  • Dec 22, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 18, 2022
KZGUNS
Y
Starting a build looking for insight!
  • Yellow5.094
  • Dec 9, 2020
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 9, 2020
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?