• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Went to the track tonight; Got some problems/questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter sneaky98gt
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 20, 2009
#21
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #21
back when i did similar mods to mine as you i had to add an adjustable fuel pressure regulator to really get anything out of it. a tune id what you need OR steeda timing adjuster and fuel pressure regulator.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Jun 20, 2009
#22
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #22
Your fooling yourself if you think its anything other than the fact that you havent gotten a custom tune...
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,391
3,538
233
Jun 20, 2009
#23
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #23
deftsound said:
Your fooling yourself if you think its anything other than the fact that you havent gotten a custom tune...
Click to expand...



OP, sure there might be a small leak after the MAF and that would slow you down just a hair but the main issue is the tune.

Your factory computer has been programed with a set of restrictions in it. The car knows how much power it is making and if it exceeds the factory specs the computer will pull timing untill its back within those specs. Get the damn thing tuned! Also, do the J-mod.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Jun 20, 2009
#24
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #24
MPH is slow for a 1450 DA on a pi cammed automatic.. trap is about 6-7 MPH low


Start with a tune.. then without being there it could be hard to tell but trans slippage could be a cause too. But I would think you could feel that
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jun 20, 2009
#25
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #25
svttech76 said:
MPH is slow for a 1450 DA on a pi cammed automatic.. trap is about 6-7 MPH low


Start with a tune.. then without being there it could be hard to tell but trans slippage could be a cause too. But I would think you could feel that
Click to expand...

Yea, that trap is way low. That's why I'm worried. I thought I would be at least somewhat faster, even without a tune. But the general consensus here is that the tune is the problem, and I've talked a few guys I know that are saying the same thing. Even though I'm not completely convinced that the tune is all of the problem, it's really the only thing I can do. If there is something wrong w/ computer, o2 sensor, maf, iat, etc., the tuners could figure it out. I've been wanting/needing a tune for a while now, and now that I've got the cams in, I'm gonna go ahead and get one. Hopefully it'll fix the problem.

The tranny isn't slipping, or if it is, it is a very, very little amount, not noticeable.

Thanks for the help guys.

-Will
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jun 21, 2009
#26
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #26
look dude a 1 point lean or rich a/f accounts for your losses. adda a few dergrees of timing pull and it gets wirse. thats why adjustable regulators and timing adjusters were created for 96-98's.
 
C

Chucks98

New Member
May 4, 2008
19
0
2
West Newton,PA
Jun 21, 2009
#27
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #27
as has been said a custom tune will do alot. the timing adjuster is nice but since it only adjusts the base timing the computer will still screw with the timing more so than if you had it set in the tune.
also check your fuel rails to see if you have a changeable regulator mine is permanently attached to the rail
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 22, 2009
#28
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #28
Who did the cams? Are they right? Did the timing marks line up?

Secondly, get a tune if you don't have one after cams.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Jun 22, 2009
#29
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #29
I agree with everyone else here saying to get a tune. Additionally, if you have access to a scan tool, check your long term fuel trims.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jun 22, 2009
#30
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #30
I put the cams in myself. I didn't take off the timing cover when I changed them, so if they are off, the stock npi cams were off as well.

A scan tool isn't the same as an OBD-II code reader, right? If not, I don't have a scan tool. I'm waiting to get all of my 87 octane gas out and 93 octane in before I go to talk to the tuners near me. I'll probably get it tuned within the next two weeks. Thanks for the help.

-Will
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,278
368
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jun 22, 2009
#31
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #31
It doesn't need a tune to run good. The 98 tune is actually pretty good as is. My car runs good w/o a tune and it has a whole pi engine in it. SURE a tune will help but thats not the cause for his slow times.......

A tune will only net him 2-3 mph at best... He has some other underlying issue here. The trans/convertor could be it. Could not be. Hard to tell via the net.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jun 22, 2009
#32
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #32
squeak93 said:
It doesn't need a tune to run good. The 98 tune is actually pretty good as is. My car runs good w/o a tune and it has a whole pi engine in it. SURE a tune will help but thats not the cause for his slow times.......

A tune will only net him 2-3 mph at best... He has some other underlying issue here. The trans/convertor could be it. Could not be. Hard to tell via the net.
Click to expand...

This is what worries me. That brings the total up to what, 4 now, that don't have tunes and are running fine? Now I know that a tune is honestly the only thing I can do right now, and I am still probably gonna get one sometime soon because it will help me anyway. But I somewhat think something else is going on. I don't know what though, so a dyno tune is my only option anyway.

I'll try and get an acceleration video up sometime tomorrow. Idk if you could hear tranny slipping or not; I'll give ya a try. I don't really think the tranny has a problem though.

Anyone know what one of those little rubber bungs on my CAI that the IAT sensor slides into would be called or where to find one? I can't seem to be able to find anyone that knows.

-Will
 

MaxedGT

Member
Mar 31, 2005
304
0
17
Surrey BC Canada
Jun 23, 2009
#33
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #33
If your auto is shifting at 5500 rpm that is too low for the pi cams. Shift manually and I'm sure you'll run quicker. Just remember to shift about 300 to 400 rpm sooner than you want the shift to take place. Probably 500 sooner on the 1-2 shift and 300 on the 2-3.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,278
368
164
Joplin, Missouri
Jun 23, 2009
#34
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #34
I have shifted all my PI motors at 5500. The engine stops making power at 5250 so why take it higher?
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Jun 23, 2009
#35
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #35
'00 GT, Ford says peak HP @ 5000. I shift mine @ 5750.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jun 24, 2009
#36
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #36
Here's the vid I promised. I think you can see it. I just put it up bout 20 minutes ago, so if you can't, just wait a little while.

YouTube - 1998 Mustang GT 0-60 Tranny slipping?

I timed about 6.6-6.7 0-60, whereas my last video (also on youtube under my same name) with the same mods minus the PI cams is in the 6.3-6.4 range. That's the rough difference in my 1/8 mile track times, so the vids seem to be consistent with my track times.

I don't think the tranny or torque converter is slipping. And before y'all tell me, I know not to race the car in 2nd gear like that. I did it only for the video to put up here. I wasn't sure if it would help, but anyways, it's in there.

-Will
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Jun 24, 2009
#37
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #37
hmm... it looks like it's pulling good
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jun 24, 2009
#38
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #38
98COBRA281 said:
hmm... it looks like it's pulling good
Click to expand...

Yea, it feels like it too. I really thought it felt a lot better after I got the cams in. Felt lots better after the PI intake as well. But the times don't seem to be showing that. idk, I've got over half the tank of 87 octane gas out so far, so it won't be much longer before I get it tuned.

Btw, did your times and numbers come before or after a tune?

-Will
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Jun 24, 2009
#39
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #39
sneaky98gt said:
Yea, it feels like it too. I really thought it felt a lot better after I got the cams in. Felt lots better after the PI intake as well. But the times don't seem to be showing that. idk, I've got over half the tank of 87 octane gas out so far, so it won't be much longer before I get it tuned.

Btw, did your times and numbers come before or after a tune?

-Will
Click to expand...

I gained 5-6mph on my 98 after doing headswaps(I did a few with different engines over the years).

I gained 2mph with just a PI intake on my 97 car.

Neither had a tune, the stock tune worked fine for me. I'm sure I could have picked up another 10hp or so. I think that you have something going wrong with your car.

Take it to a shop and get it on a dyno with a wideband. BTW, what is the race weight of your car?
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Jun 25, 2009
#40
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #40
sneaky98gt said:
Yea, it feels like it too. I really thought it felt a lot better after I got the cams in. Felt lots better after the PI intake as well. But the times don't seem to be showing that. idk, I've got over half the tank of 87 octane gas out so far, so it won't be much longer before I get it tuned.

Btw, did your times and numbers come before or after a tune?

-Will
Click to expand...

my car was UNTUNED, and made 225rwhp/270rwtq, 14.17 @ 95.xx
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
994
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
411
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
334
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
589
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
C
Knocking after pull- went away?
  • Connormcclark
  • Oct 6, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
232
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?