• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What does the bored and stroked 351 build look like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennylava
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2022
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 18, 2022
#1
  • Aug 18, 2022
  • #1
Hi all, I'm considering building a bored and stroked 351 Windsor for my 1993 Ford F150. It was my dad's old truck and it came with the 351. And I've always liked the truck. I've already had it painted and fixed up the interior, and it looks mostly stock. Still I think it would be a fun truck to drive on the weekends, if it had a lot more power. You see a lot of chevy trucks running around like that, mainly the square body 73-87's. But I'd like to do a ford.

Someone said a stock 302 block is only good for around 450 HP before it will crack. So how much is the windsor block good for? And what's considered a "medium" overbore, that won't be borderline too thin? Some of those maximum overbores seem to push the limits. Maybe you don't build a bored/stroked engine for that, I dunno. I'm a newb compared to most of you guys here.

I've heard people stroking them to a 427, and that sounds good to me if it will last. So which heads, cam and intake go well with that? And what kind of road manners will it have? I would like to take the truck on some long trips sometimes, so road manners are a consideration. Thanks!
 
Reactions: WhiteCobra95

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 18, 2022
#2
  • Aug 18, 2022
  • #2
I don't have a lot of experience with small block stokers, but if you are looking for good reliable street power from a naturally aspirated 351 there are three key ingredients: 1) Roller cam (not sure what year they switched from flat tappets to rollers in 351s), 2) Good cylinder heads, and 3) An intake that matches the cylinder head capability and cam grind. You can make really good numbers on a 351 without a stroking it. Low to mid 400s with decent mid-range torque should be no problem, and probably double what the F150 had stock. If you need more oomph than that, the stroker is the way to go in order to keep mid-range torque, which you'll want for a truck-weight vehicle.

I've seen high rpm stock-two-bolt-block 351s lay down 800hp at the track in full race trim. If you're in the 400 to 500 hp range, which is about as much as you would want for the street and a long distance cruiser, the 351 block should be perfectly fine.

This sounds like a fun project! I fully support your efforts. (I miss my '94 F150. Of all the daily drivers I've had, that's the one I would love to have back!)
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Aug 18, 2022
#3
  • Aug 18, 2022
  • #3
The 351 block is reported to hold 750hp without issues. If I had a truck, with all that engine bay space, a supercharger would be in there. A 408 stroker kit would also be there. If money isn't an issue this would be the way to go. If money is a factor the parts list in the description could be modified and a custom camshaft could be added.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/hpe-hp21m



This is the supercharger kit

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/pax-1001844-p



I had a 1988 econoline van named Papa Smurf. I really wanted to build it but life got in the way. A built f150 would be bad ass.

The supercharger in this post might not be enough for the engine posted but you get the idea. I did absolutely no research...just hit the search bar.
 
Last edited: Aug 18, 2022
Reactions: WhiteCobra95
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 18, 2022
#4
  • Aug 18, 2022
  • #4
I should have said that I'm not into carburetors. But I can't edit the OP. I just don't want to deal with tuning them or rebuilding them ever, so I stick to fuel injection. That would be important.

Does anyone know the reliability of the aforementioned builds? Would you get 150k miles out of the engine before it needed rebuilt?
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 18, 2022
#5
  • Aug 18, 2022
  • #5
bennylava said:
I should have said that I'm not into carburetors. But I can't edit the OP. I just don't want to deal with tuning them or rebuilding them ever, so I stick to fuel injection.
Click to expand...
Carbs are simple. Electrons are usually invisible.
But I do not see replacing an EFI system with a carb in any of my cars.
bennylava said:
Does anyone know the reliability of the aforementioned builds? Would you get 150k miles out of the engine before it needed rebuilt?
Click to expand...
The higher the power output, the quicker the wear. Maintenance vs. how hard and often you thrash it or spin it to 8000 rpm will also matter. Having a fun 100k is not unrealistic with quality parts and a good builder. 200k if you baby it is possible, but is that likely when the right pedal is so fun to push?
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT and 90sickfox
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 23, 2022
#6
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #6
7991LXnSHO said:
Carbs are simple. Electrons are usually invisible.
But I do not see replacing an EFI system with a carb in any of my cars.

The higher the power output, the quicker the wear. Maintenance vs. how hard and often you thrash it or spin it to 8000 rpm will also matter. Having a fun 100k is not unrealistic with quality parts and a good builder. 200k if you baby it is possible, but is that likely when the right pedal is so fun to push?
Click to expand...

Is the 351 known for reliability? Or are you starting at something of a disadvantage? I'd like to know if there's bored/stroked engines that have done high mileage. My guess would be that most people don't build them for that, so they don't last all that long.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 23, 2022
#7
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #7
bennylava said:
Is the 351 known for reliability?
Click to expand...
Yes. It’s a truck block, and cast heavier than the 302.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 23, 2022
#8
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #8
7991LXnSHO said:
Carbs are simple.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: revhead347, General karthief, bird_dog0347 and 1 other person
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 23, 2022
#9
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #9
There was a guy who used AutoCad (maybe Solidworks?) to design an intake for a roots-type blower for the 351.

I wonder if anyone every bought one from him..
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 23, 2022
#10
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #10
There's this thing but it's an ugly mofo:

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/wnd-77-174fsb-1/make/ford
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 23, 2022
#11
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #11
bennylava said:
There's this thing but it's an ugly mofo:

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/wnd-77-174fsb-1/make/ford
Click to expand...
That’s for the shorter deck 289/302. The lower intake has to be a different width for the taller block 351.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 24, 2022
#12
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • #12
I was referring to the big sewer pipe sticking out of the front
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Aug 24, 2022
#13
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • #13
bennylava said:
I was referring to the big sewer pipe sticking out of the front
Click to expand...
I’m sure there is a blower like that for the 351 W for you to hate on. Most likely, it’s just the base that needs changed for that roots type blower to fit. The centrifugal blowers look like a misplaced turbo to me.
Seriously, are you considering forced induction or NA?
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 31, 2022
#14
  • Aug 31, 2022
  • #14
Forced induction for the easy power gain. I've set aside $12k for the blower setup but if I have to I can go higher. I was hoping to find that guy that used Solidworks to design an intake that accepts a modern roots type on the 351. Looked just like something you'd see on a new mustang. But this was years ago.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 1, 2022
#15
  • Sep 1, 2022
  • #15
The 351 block will be fine. When it comes to money, spend more on the airflow like heads and cam than on displacement like stroking. Glad you came here instead of F150 forums. Those guys don't know anything.

Kurt
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,974
2,956
194
Middle of Maine
Sep 2, 2022
#16
  • Sep 2, 2022
  • #16
bennylava said:
Forced induction for the easy power gain. I've set aside $12k for the blower setup but if I have to I can go higher. I was hoping to find that guy that used Solidworks to design an intake that accepts a modern roots type on the 351. Looked just like something you'd see on a new mustang. But this was years ago.
Click to expand...
My friend had these guys: https://www.hogansracingmanifolds.com/ make him an intake manifold to mount a 4.2 liter twin screw Kenne Bell supercharger to his SBF. It cost $4,500 He then bought the Kenne Bell Supercharger for another $4,500 add in the supporting fuel rails and other bits and he came in under $12K to make it all work.
 
Reactions: General karthief
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
932
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?