• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What else do I need for my rear suspension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hoopty5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 10, 2012

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Mar 10, 2012
#1
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #1
For you guys that have sub - 11 second cars, I need some input.

I'm looking at doing this for the back half of the suspension:

Single adj uppers and lowers with spherical bushings
Watts link or wishbone?
Anti roll bar (Single or double and whats the difference?)
Coilovers with Strange single adjustables

Going to put in an 8pt cage and minitubs. Do I need to tie it in to any part of the suspension?

Any other suggestions?




THanks,
Collin
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Mar 10, 2012
#2
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #2
You want double adjustable uppers and at least single adjustable lowers. All you need is a anti roll bar without 1 link per side. You don't need a rear sway bar or the dogbone. Tie the upper and lower torque boxes into the cage and put in torque box reinforcements if you haven't already. Unless you are going for total ride height adjustability there's no need for rear coil overs. Cut the stock springs down and use the strange single adjustable shocks. Or double adjustable shocks are the way to go but even the cheapest ones (strange) are still pretty costly, but worth it. You want the lower control are to be level or on a slight angle downward which you can achieve with instant center brackets. If you run all solid bushings in the rear get you pinion angle to about -1.5.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Mar 10, 2012
#3
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #3
Go on yellowbullet and start reading. EVERYTHING. Prepare for you mind to explode its a gold mine for information
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Mar 10, 2012
#4
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #4
bentley429isBAC said:
You want double adjustable uppers and at least single adjustable lowers. All you need is a anti roll bar without 1 link per side. You don't need a rear sway bar or the dogbone. Tie the upper and lower torque boxes into the cage and put in torque box reinforcements if you haven't already. Unless you are going for total ride height adjustability there's no need for rear coil overs. Cut the stock springs down and use the strange single adjustable shocks. Or double adjustable shocks are the way to go but even the cheapest ones (strange) are still pretty costly, but worth it. You want the lower control are to be level or on a slight angle downward which you can achieve with instant center brackets. If you run all solid bushings in the rear get you pinion angle to about -1.5.
Click to expand...

Got the torque boxes done already and will do the cage when I get home from this hitch. I'd like to over build the rear suspension to handle more power down the road. When you say tie the upper and lowers into the cage, would the lowers be welded to the main hoop and the uppers tied to ???

I'm looking at a pre-fab 8 point cage that I can weld in myself. So far the Competition Engineering and Wild Rides are what I am considering. Any reason not to use them? They're certified to 9.99 and I don't forsee going anywhere near that on this current setup and my lack of driving skillz. Maaaaybe 10.50s.

Thanks for the info! I've actually spent the last 2 days on YB reading the stock suspension and chassis forums. The 25.5 and 25.3 cars are ridiculous, and you're right, my brain hurts. I was hoping someone here could dumb it down a bit. I didnt want to post over there to avoid all the wisecracks and un-needed remarks.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Mar 10, 2012
#5
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #5
http://autofabcart.net/ford88housing-boltonadjustablecontrolarmbrackets.aspx

I found these on a thread on YB. Everyone says they are great and affordable. Guys in the 1.30 60' range. But I'd have to run coilovers because with stock springs, moving the control arm changes the ride height. With coilovers, you just raise them up to account for the difference. This is what the thread says at least. Many people said these brackets helped them go from blowing the tires off to a dead hook with no other changes.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Mar 10, 2012
#6
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #6
Also, if I have all heim joints on the control arms, wouldn't I need something to keep the rear end centered?
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Mar 10, 2012
#7
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #7
hoopty5.0 said:
http://autofabcart.net/ford88housing-boltonadjustablecontrolarmbrackets.aspx

I found these on a thread on YB. Everyone says they are great and affordable. Guys in the 1.30 60' range. But I'd have to run coilovers because with stock springs, moving the control arm changes the ride height. With coilovers, you just raise them up to account for the difference. This is what the thread says at least. Many people said these brackets helped them go from blowing the tires off to a dead hook with no other changes.
Click to expand...

Correct but you generally dont need to change your ride height all the time. I cut almost 1 full coil off a set of stock springs, with brackets I got from a guy on YB 1 hole down from stock which is about 1" the lower control arm is going down on a slight angle. Body mounting point is the higher side, it is 2 degrees. Car is sitting at 27 1/4" with 1/4 tank of fuel. With a full tank its a C hair over 27" which is about where you want to try to get it. Front is at 26". Front tires are 26" DS2's and rears are 28x10.5 MT.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Mar 10, 2012
#8
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #8
hoopty5.0 said:
Also, if I have all heim joints on the control arms, wouldn't I need something to keep the rear end centered?
Click to expand...

Not that I know of. There is enough mounting points where the rear end shouldnt be walking around.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Mar 10, 2012
#9
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #9
bentley429isBAC said:
Not that I know of. There is enough mounting points where the rear end shouldnt be walking around.
Click to expand...


100% correct, it shouldn't be flopping around, the spherical ends just allow everything to articulate easily with out binding.

I used brackets like your link on a 9" rear in a fox drag car.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,781
6,935
214
SW Houston
Mar 10, 2012
#10
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #10
Cool. Thanks for all of the info, guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
160
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
Rear suspension advice needed
  • Mach1Madness
  • Jan 25, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2020
wicked93gs
M
My 82 hatch 408 build
  • Miskitobyte15
  • Jun 16, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2018
Gear grabber
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?