What I'm looking for is how much vacuum was used, did they flow test it with a filter, etc, so I can get a more accurate comparison againt the 97mm Abaco.
What engine builder should I go with?
- Thread starter Stryfe8822
- Start date
What I'm looking for is how much vacuum was used, did they flow test it with a filter, etc, so I can get a more accurate comparison againt the 97mm Abaco.
NikwoaC
Ok Nic, I have the book in front of me. Ask away.
All the meters tested at Extrude Hone with Flow Rate @ 28in on Superflow 600. Testing with air filter knocked off almost 200cfm.
Stock 5.0 MAF 58mm- 606cfm
Cobra 70MM- 815cfm
Pro-M 75MM Bullet- 964cfm
C&L 73MM- 1171cfm
C&L 80MM- 1415cfm, w/ filter 1254cfm
Ford 80MM- 1017cfm, w/ filter 988cfm
Powertrain 80MM (removed bar) 1368cfm, w/ filter 1313cfm
Pro-M 77MM Shorty- 1543cfm, w/ filter 1360cfm
Pro-M 77MM Standard- 1562cfm, w/ filter 1377cfm
Pro-M 80MM- 1598cfm, w/ filter 1377cfm
Ok Nic, I have the book in front of me. Ask away.
All the meters tested at Extrude Hone with Flow Rate @ 28in on Superflow 600. Testing with air filter knocked off almost 200cfm.
Stock 5.0 MAF 58mm- 606cfm
Cobra 70MM- 815cfm
Pro-M 75MM Bullet- 964cfm
C&L 73MM- 1171cfm
C&L 80MM- 1415cfm, w/ filter 1254cfm
Ford 80MM- 1017cfm, w/ filter 988cfm
Powertrain 80MM (removed bar) 1368cfm, w/ filter 1313cfm
Pro-M 77MM Shorty- 1543cfm, w/ filter 1360cfm
Pro-M 77MM Standard- 1562cfm, w/ filter 1377cfm
Pro-M 80MM- 1598cfm, w/ filter 1377cfm
Ah, OK, that makes more sense now. I was going to be blown away if the Pro-M 80 flowed more than the 97mm Abaco, but between the higher vacuum and the lack of an air filter, it makes sense now. I'd be curious to see the Abaco flowed along side those others under the same conditions.
Similar threads
