GusinCA said:I have heard, however, that the lowest fuel grade often doesn't have the cleaning agents that the plus and super fuels have, is this true?
I have two Fords, a 2000 GT vert, and a 2004 Expedition. I have heard both of them knock slightly under hard loads (acceleration or trailer pulling) so I use 89, this has solved the issue permanently.
Glenns05 said:"The octane rating of gasoline tells you how much the fuel can be compressed before it spontaneously ignites. When gas ignites by compression rather than because of the spark from the spark plug, it causes knocking in the engine. Knocking can damage an engine, so it is not something you want to have happening.
Lower-octane gas (like "regular" 87-octane gasoline) can handle the least amount of compression before igniting.
The compression ratio of your engine determines the octane rating of the gas you must use in the car. One way to increase the horsepower of an engine of a given displacement is to increase its compression ratio. So a "high-performance engine" has a higher compression ratio and requires higher-octane fuel."
The 4.6L has a 9.8:1 compression ratio and is borderline (IMHO) as far as needing to go to a higher octane rating. My understanding is: knock senors eliminate early detonation as a problem but it costs you some hp - as the engine studders a little bit.
GusinCA said:I have heard, however, that the lowest fuel grade often doesn't have the cleaning agents that the plus and super fuels have, is this true?
I have two Fords, a 2000 GT vert, and a 2004 Expedition. I have heard both of them knock slightly under hard loads (acceleration or trailer pulling) so I use 89, this has solved the issue permanently.
Razinhell said:Doesn't the 05 also have Variable Valve timing, which will help it get the most out of the gas you put in it? The 2004 had a 9.4:1 ratio. With the new 3-valve and variable valve timing the newer engine is able to get the most out of what you put in it to a point. If you add more safe guards (higher octane) it cannot get more out of it, only what its originally capable of. And in some cases worse results due to the nature of chemical reactions.
QUOTE]
That is a great explanation of variable timing, thanks and you are right; higher octane does not give the engine more power than it is designed to provide. But valve timing has nothing to do with compression and thus early detonation.
The knock sensors just reduce timing (variable of not) and that reduces power output. If you have a high performance motor say, 10.8:1 compression with variable timing the engine would still require 91 octanes.
So, it really boils down to this - is the Mustang engine a high performance engine or not (9.8:1) compression is close. I am willing to bet that as soon as a performance tune is loaded into the PCM the engine will require a higher octane.
Finally, the higher octane rating is achieved through further refining. And as a result, higher octane fuel is a cleaner burning fuel (at least that’s my understanding) so I will pay the extra $100 - $200 just for environmental concern.
I run have run Aamco ultimate (91+ or higher) in all my cars and synthetic fluids for the last 15-years. The last car I sold had 70,000 miles on it and before I sold the car I had the compression tested, etc. Every cylinder showed factory spec compression.
I run have run Aamco ultimate (91+ or higher) in all my cars and synthetic fluids for the last 15-years. The last car I sold had 70,000 miles on it and before I sold the car I had the compression tested, etc. Every cylinder showed factory spec compression.
Glenns05 said:But it is all still refined to the same standards - right?
Sounds like people might be confusing variable valve timing with variable spark timing. Engines have been using variable spark timing for a very long time. It has no relationship at all to the valve timing.Glenns05 said:The knock sensors just reduce timing (variable of not) and that reduces power output. If you have a high performance motor say, 10.8:1 compression with variable timing the engine would still require 91 octanes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?