• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

What gears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89' RICE COOKER
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2007
8

89' RICE COOKER

New Member
Mar 3, 2003
325
0
0
Po-town Oregon
Apr 7, 2007
#1
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #1
Im wondering what gears in the rear came stock on a 89' 2.3 auto?
3.55? im looking to upgrade them this weekend and wanted something a litter better, but not too extreme because I still do alot of freeway driving being its my daily driver. what would be a good upgrade...3.73? are 4.10 gonna be too harsh on the freeway and gas?
 
E

ethangsmith

Member
Jan 28, 2007
227
0
16
Manheim, PA
Apr 7, 2007
#2
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #2
Rear gears should be 3.73 for your automatic. My 88 auto has them. 4.10s may be a bit much, but it depends how much you're worried about fuel economy.
 
8

89' RICE COOKER

New Member
Mar 3, 2003
325
0
0
Po-town Oregon
Apr 8, 2007
#3
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #3
3.73s really? theres no ratio i can get between those and the 4.10s is there? with the 4.10s im not really worried so much about gas as i am about the RPMs on the freeway. its a new motor with about 8k. how much is it gonna change, say around 75mph you think?
 
E

ethangsmith

Member
Jan 28, 2007
227
0
16
Manheim, PA
Apr 8, 2007
#4
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #4
There is a way to calculate it out, but I have no idea how to do it. What I do know is that my 88 automatic pulls about 2000rpms at 55mph in overdrive with the converter clutch locked. Since the speeds around here are slow and it's a fairly built-up area, I've probably only ever done 75 in the car once or twice. I would imagine it would be at about 2500-3000rpms. Putting 4.10s in would make it quite a bit higher. Probably at 55 you would see rpms of 2500-2750 and at 75 you would be over 3000, probably near 3500-3750. I see you've done exhaust and intake work. That should have woken it up a little bit. Do you have a Ranger steel header on it? That gives you a little more low-end grunt.
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Apr 9, 2007
#5
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #5
Got to merkurtech.com and you'll find some cool little calculators. you punch in your trans info, tire size and rear gear and it will tell you "X" mph and at "X" rpm in each gear.
 
8

89' RICE COOKER

New Member
Mar 3, 2003
325
0
0
Po-town Oregon
Apr 9, 2007
#6
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #6
sweet, thanx. ive been there a long time ago. just couldnt remember where i saw it.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Apr 9, 2007
#7
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #7
ethangsmith said:
Since the speeds around here are slow and it's a fairly built-up area, I've probably only ever done 75 in the car once or twice. I would imagine it would be at about 2500-3000rpms.
Click to expand...

4.10's isn't such a big jump actaully. It is only ~10% difference. So what was 3000 at 75, would be 3300 at 75. What was 2000 at 55 would be 2200.


In my opinion, it wouldn't be worth it.

As for not going 75, that's a bit surprising to me. Barely a day goes by that I'm not in a 70mph zone.

My 88 has 3.73's and no OD. It is a bit much on the highway. Both my cars have no trouble hitting 75mph in 9s or less though
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Apr 10, 2007
#8
  • Apr 10, 2007
  • #8
89' RICE COOKER said:
3.73s really? theres no ratio i can get between those and the 4.10s is there? with the 4.10s im not really worried so much about gas as i am about the RPMs on the freeway. its a new motor with about 8k. how much is it gonna change, say around 75mph you think?
Click to expand...

If you had an 8.8" you could get 3.91's but with the 7.5" you go from 3.73 to 4.10's.
 

Slow92LX

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
49
0
0
Where ever I roam
Apr 11, 2007
#9
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #9
Auto 4 banger mustangs came with 3.73s in your 7.5 rear. this thread has some good info -> http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=629160
 
8

89' RICE COOKER

New Member
Mar 3, 2003
325
0
0
Po-town Oregon
Apr 11, 2007
#10
  • Apr 11, 2007
  • #10
bhuff30 said:
4.10's isn't such a big jump actaully. It is only ~10% difference. So what was 3000 at 75, would be 3300 at 75. What was 2000 at 55 would be 2200.


In my opinion, it wouldn't be worth it.

As for not going 75, that's a bit surprising to me. Barely a day goes by that I'm not in a 70mph zone.

My 88 has 3.73's and no OD. It is a bit much on the highway. Both my cars have no trouble hitting 75mph in 9s or less though
Click to expand...

Bhuff, what do you mean " not worth it"? like money and time wise or just gas and freeway wise?
p.s. was the header i asked you about on ebay from a '95? is it the 93-95 that i should pull, or are there more years? sorry to go off subject.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
144
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
O
My rebirth, Hi from PA
  • onemore1987
  • Jun 28, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
136
The Welcome Wagon Jun 29, 2026
onemore1987
O
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
594
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Advice after break down.
  • bjornsn95
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 1:28 AM
bjornsn95
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?