• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

what heads for my 86?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnsplowing207
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 4, 2010
#21
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #21
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/FORD...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories?hash=item4a9f0332d9

much better bang for the buck
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 4, 2010
#22
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #22
I was only hoping to spend 200-250 total on a set of heads
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 4, 2010
#23
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #23
C9TE these heads good?
what gt40 heads will bolt right up to my 86 5.0 motor and exhaust,gt40p or gt40.was told the gt40p heads I'd need a special set of headers.
are e7 heads good?
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Mar 4, 2010
#24
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #24
E7 are better than the E6 you have now but I'm with stythyn about their not being worth the cost of shipping. Save your nickles and dimes and get a set of the TFS heads.
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 5, 2010
#25
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #25
if I have my stock heads cut for 2.02 1.60 valves would it make any diference?or what can i have done to my stock heads to make them better?
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Mar 5, 2010
#26
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #26
E6 heads = Dead issue
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 5, 2010
#27
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #27
so even having them cut for 202 160 valves will do nothing
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 5, 2010
#28
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #28
johnsplowing207 said:
so even having them cut for 202 160 valves will do nothing
Click to expand...

The '86 heads suck mainly because they have significant valve shrouding. Cutting for larger valves would probably be a waste.
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Mar 5, 2010
#29
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #29
johnsplowing207 said:
so even having them cut for 202 160 valves will do nothing
Click to expand...

it will actually make them work worse because a stock arcitecture ford head already has the intake valve up against the side of the cylinder wall, so you put a 2.02 in it and itll be right up next to the cylinder wall and will shroud the valve.

which would be a big problem even if those heads had the port cross sectional area to support having a 2.02, which they dont. its a complete waste of money. i wouldnt even waste money on larger valves. if you want to play with something, play with valvejobs and better quality valves. all valves are not created equal. you could cut them for a bigger valve, but if you dont have the cross section and shape to allow the larger valve to do its job (or if the valve is shrouded by the wall) it wont run any better and many times it will run worse.
 
R

RatStang

New Member
Feb 11, 2010
544
0
0
Mar 5, 2010
#30
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #30
johnsplowing207 said:
so even having them cut for 202 160 valves will do nothing
Click to expand...

Correct... and aside from some oddly shaped chambers and the shrouding mentioned above, the valve stems themselves are short. Shorter than what you'd find on a set of E7s etc.

It's not to say that you'd not be able to find new valves but it may be more of a search than normally expected and the end result?.... reduced lift of an oversized valve and a net result of STILL poor performance.
 
W

wv109323

Member
Sep 11, 2008
100
1
18
Lenore ,WV
Mar 5, 2010
#31
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #31
heads

Check out:

thumperoforangepark.com

They seem to have the best bang for the buck on heads.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,024
1,616
194
NJ
Mar 5, 2010
#32
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #32
Do what chrome rust says and swap to mass air before you mess with anything at all.
Because if you do it all at once and it doesn't run right, you could be tracking down the problem forever.

Get the MAf right, then do the head swap.

And don't waste any of your money on e6 or e7 heads.
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 5, 2010
#33
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #33
what cc's are 96 explorer heads?what are some good .030 over pistons to get.the motor is not going to be forced.is it good to run a high compression motor
 
J

johnsplowing207

New Member
Mar 1, 2010
99
0
0
sanford maine
Mar 14, 2010
#34
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #34
are these good heads for the money ebay item number 120542063815
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
859
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
149
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
556
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
357
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
195
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?