• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Fuel What Is A 2.3 Turbo Mpg?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Undeadknight26
  • Start date Start date Jul 2, 2013

Undeadknight26

Active Member
May 19, 2013
97
15
29
Florida
Jul 2, 2013
#1
  • Jul 2, 2013
  • #1
Hi guys! I have a quick question that might lead into more but what is the miles/gallon for 1989-93 2.3 turbo coupe? And is it rare to get one with stick shift? I've been looking for a while now and never found a stick one...
 

4cammer72

Likes to drop it and leave it crusty lookin
Mar 28, 2007
90
6
9
west columbia south carolina
Jul 2, 2013
#2
  • Jul 2, 2013
  • #2
turbo coupes were made from 83 to 88, 87-88 were intercooled, ive had 5 tcoupes, i averaged 22 in town and 31-33 highway with the 2 87's i had, upper 20's with the 84 and 85...all 5 speeds, the autos got less.....83 to 86 were 155 hp and 87-88 sticks were 190 hp
 
Reactions: Undeadknight26

Undeadknight26

Active Member
May 19, 2013
97
15
29
Florida
Jul 10, 2013
#3
  • Jul 10, 2013
  • #3
One more question please! i just found out the the mustang i want has 88-105 HP! Does this include the turbo model? And what other 4cyl motor can i swap in it with the less work to give me a bit more horse power? It has to be a 4 cylinder engine!
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 10, 2013
#4
  • Jul 10, 2013
  • #4
The 88-105 HP models are Normally Aspirated - No turbo.

87-90 (I don't recall what the 4-eye models were rated at N/A) have 88 HP and utilize a distributor. 91-93 Models have some head revisions (dual plug head), a different cam, utilize a distributorless ignition system (DIS) and produce 105 HP.

Although you can swap a 2.3L Turbo into any 79-93 Fox Mustang, the easiest ones to do are the 87-90 models. The 91-93 models are more difficult because they have some differences in the wiring, however it can be done and the required modifications to the wiring harness are well documented.

The easiest, cheapest way to improve the performance of an 87-93 2.3L mustang is to swap in a turbo engine from the Thunderbird Turbo Coupe ('83-'88, with the 87-88 models being the most desirable) or to get a turbo 2.3l out of a Mustang SVO or Turbo GT. Although there is little difference, the Mustang parts are generally more expensive.

Why can't you slap a turbo on your N/A 2.3L Mustang engine?

Answer: You could, but the cast pistons are weak (the Turbo engines use Forged pistons) and create a higher compression ratio that creates a higher chance of detonation, which is the number one cause of engine failure in a boosted application.
Your N/A block, rods, and crank are up to the task of supporting a turbo, so if you were to rebuild the engine using quality pistons, then all you have to do is add the turbo drainback to the block (it is already machined in a turbo block) or simply add the drainback to the oil pan.

Some people like to rebuild the N/A motors due to availability, or because they want the increased displacement from a later Ranger 2.5L engine, which is simply a stroker version of the 2.3L.
 
Reactions: Undeadknight26

Undeadknight26

Active Member
May 19, 2013
97
15
29
Florida
Jul 11, 2013
#5
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #5
Is it hard to find a 5speed 4cyl turbo notch back mustang?
 

91TwighlightGT

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
1,190
375
124
Missouri
Jul 11, 2013
#6
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #6
IMO, yes because even though the swap is fairly simple, I wouldn't call it "common" by any means. If you limit your search to notches it is even less common.
 
Reactions: Undeadknight26

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jul 12, 2013
#7
  • Jul 12, 2013
  • #7
Undeadknight26 said:
Hi guys! I have a quick question that might lead into more but what is the miles/gallon for 1989-93 2.3 turbo coupe?
Click to expand...

Firstly, there were no Thunderbird Turbo Coupes after '88; the first generation was from '83-86 and the second was from '87-88. Some people have reported over 30mpg on the highway with a 5-spd Turbo Coupe. I think high 20s is more realistic. I averaged about 26mpg in my '84 SVO at 70mph and the TCs are a little more aerodynamic than a Mustang.

I get the impression that you're confusing terminology for a "turbo mustang notchback," of which there were no factory-offered ones, with the original turbo 2.3L Thunderbirds, which were called Turbo Coupes.
 
Reactions: Undeadknight26

Undeadknight26

Active Member
May 19, 2013
97
15
29
Florida
Jul 13, 2013
#8
  • Jul 13, 2013
  • #8
Yes thank you...but i was asking if it was hard to get one with the engine already swapped in...now that i read back my comments i understand what you mean.
 

4cammer72

Likes to drop it and leave it crusty lookin
Mar 28, 2007
90
6
9
west columbia south carolina
Jul 15, 2013
#9
  • Jul 15, 2013
  • #9
actually turbo ghia's were offered early in the fox platform but were carbed turbo..
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jul 19, 2013
#10
  • Jul 19, 2013
  • #10
Swapped Mustangs are hard to find, Turbo Coupes are a little easier to find but unfortunately nowadays they are anywhere from 25-30 years old which means they may not be in the best shape.

I used to get 26 mpg highway in my '87 Turbo Coupe, and around 20 in mostly city driving.
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Jul 19, 2013
#11
  • Jul 19, 2013
  • #11
You may be able to find one already swapped over at turboford.org
 
B

beeker69

Member
Sep 7, 2013
6
1
14
Squamish BC Canada
Sep 7, 2013
#12
  • Sep 7, 2013
  • #12
I got between 29 and 30 with my 86 SVO with mods but roughly 6 mpg at full boost. ( 20 lbs )
 

Undeadknight26

Active Member
May 19, 2013
97
15
29
Florida
Sep 7, 2013
#13
  • Sep 7, 2013
  • #13
Hi beeker...That sounds like a beautiful car. Do u mind posting a pic? Also is it rare to find a 1986 svo? What would the mpg be of a stock one? Is it true it gets around 200 hp stock?
 
B

beeker69

Member
Sep 7, 2013
6
1
14
Squamish BC Canada
Sep 7, 2013
#14
  • Sep 7, 2013
  • #14
they are getting harder to find all the time. Yes they were 200 HP stock. Mine was dyno'ed at 342
 
Reactions: Undeadknight26
B

Bansheeman6100

Member
Mar 15, 2011
185
0
17
Oct 15, 2013
#15
  • Oct 15, 2013
  • #15
beautiful SVO, well well done sir
 
B

Bansheeman6100

Member
Mar 15, 2011
185
0
17
Oct 15, 2013
#16
  • Oct 15, 2013
  • #16
as to the MPG, i just got 20MPG on the last tank, which was mainly city commuting. my best highway is 26.5, and that was at 75 with the windows down. ive got a big-valved head with a BoPort 2,1 kit, T3, 3" DP to dual 2.5" exhaust, Large NPR and VAM. i have serious drivability issues with my setup and the LA3, but i am expecting the MPG to get even better with the PIMP, eliminating the VAM and the ported/gutted/port matched intakes and 94-95 TB i have on the way
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
S
Trying to decide if I should sell my 70 vert
  • Sixt9
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
164
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Sixt9
S
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
990
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
282
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?